Denmark
Regular Season Round 24: Randers - Naestved 56-105
Date: February 25, 2016
The game in Randers supposed to be also quite interesting. Third ranked Naestved (16-10) played at the court of 6th ranked Randers (8-17). Naestved smashed Randers 105-56 on Thursday. The game without a history. Naestved led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. They dominated on the defensive end, holding Randers to just 6 points in third quarter. Naestved dominated down low during the game scoring 76 of its points in the paint compared to Randers' 30 and made 17-of-21 free shots (81.0 percent) during the game. They outrebounded Randers 50-25 including a 37-14 advantage in defensive rebounds. Naestved looked well-organized offensively handing out 26 assists comparing to just 11 passes made by Randers' players. The best player for the winners was American guard Caleb Walker (193-89, college: Nebraska) who had a double-double by scoring 23 points, 10 rebounds and 7 assists (on 10-of-13 shooting from the field). The other American import forward Darris Santee (203-87, college: UNLV) chipped in 23 points and 8 rebounds (on 9-of-11 shooting from the field). Five Naestved players scored in double figures. At the other side the best for losing team was American-Belizean point guard Charles Burgess (186-84, college: Texas Tech) who recorded 13 points and Latvian point guard Reno Silavs (180-91) added 11 points respectively. Randers' coach Morten Hansen gave up on the game allowing to play eleven players seeing no chance for a win. Naestved maintains third position with 16-10 record having five points less than leader Horsens IC. Randers lost sixth consecutive game. They keep the sixth place with 17 games lost. Naestved will meet at home Horsholm (#5) in the next round. Randers will play against Stevnsgade and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 24: Randers - Naestved 56-105
Date: February 25, 2016
The game in Randers supposed to be also quite interesting. Third ranked Naestved (16-10) played at the court of 6th ranked Randers (8-17). Naestved smashed Randers 105-56 on Thursday. The game without a history. Naestved led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. They dominated on the defensive end, holding Randers to just 6 points in third quarter. Naestved dominated down low during the game scoring 76 of its points in the paint compared to Randers' 30 and made 17-of-21 free shots (81.0 percent) during the game. They outrebounded Randers 50-25 including a 37-14 advantage in defensive rebounds. Naestved looked well-organized offensively handing out 26 assists comparing to just 11 passes made by Randers' players. The best player for the winners was American guard Caleb Walker (193-89, college: Nebraska) who had a double-double by scoring 23 points, 10 rebounds and 7 assists (on 10-of-13 shooting from the field). The other American import forward Darris Santee (203-87, college: UNLV) chipped in 23 points and 8 rebounds (on 9-of-11 shooting from the field). Five Naestved players scored in double figures. At the other side the best for losing team was American-Belizean point guard Charles Burgess (186-84, college: Texas Tech) who recorded 13 points and Latvian point guard Reno Silavs (180-91) added 11 points respectively. Randers' coach Morten Hansen gave up on the game allowing to play eleven players seeing no chance for a win. Naestved maintains third position with 16-10 record having five points less than leader Horsens IC. Randers lost sixth consecutive game. They keep the sixth place with 17 games lost. Naestved will meet at home Horsholm (#5) in the next round. Randers will play against Stevnsgade and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
 NAESTVED (coach: David Pavlakovich)105 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 9 | AijURR, giQQas | 46 | 9-7 (99.2%) | 8-8 (655%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 84 | 44 | 5 |
| 0 | kisaZ, SlRVsijdiQ | 45 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-3 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | WilVRQ, CilRM | 80 | 65-68 (24.4%) | 5-6 (5%) | 4-4 (655%) | 3 | 1 | 65 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 84 | 49 | 5 |
| 65 | miV, SlRxijdRQ | 80 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 66 | 67 | 5 |
| 68 | GiMQaRl, ChQasUIphRQ | 84 | 7-65 (75%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-4 (655%) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 86 | 46 | 5 |
| 60 | einILaZ, yalap | 84 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 0 | -8 | 5 |
| 7 | mIjdR, bids | 60 | 4-2 (49.0%) | 5-8 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 2 | 5 |
| 63 | AijR, ChRaVh | 63 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| 3 | ChQasURjsRj, biUhais | 65 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 64 | ChQasURjsRj, wIMais | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 42-06 (93.0%) | 3-60 (81.9%) | 69-86 (26.5%) | 64 | 49 | 05 | 81 | 86 | 69 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 69 | 650 | 638 | |||
 RANDERS (coach: Jeffrey Fawme)56 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 66 | muQDRss, ChiQlRs | 80 | 3-68 (44.4%) | 5-4 (5%) | 0-9 (96.3%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 64 | 1 | 5 |
| 9 | GIUUsRlaD, wQIF | 80 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 0 | ABRdlRF, g.z. | 83 | 4-1 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 5 |
| 7 | XaRlsRj, XaZVF | 86 | 8-8 (655%) | 6-3 (80%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| 65 | AaliLs, eRjI | 62 | 5-5 (5%) | 4-2 (49.0%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 9 | 5 |
| 68 | eisBussRj, ARMisUaij | 62 | 6-9 (63.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 64 | yRQjijdRJ-bujVhIlB, gijaRl | 69 | 5-3 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | -4 | 5 |
| 60 | mRjdUsRj, ChQasUaij | 61 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 |
| 3 | vIjsUQup HijsRj, SjUIj | 66 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | HijsRj, biUhais | 65 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 1 | eisBussRj, biUUhais | 65 | 5-3 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | -0 | 5 |
| wIUil | 60-31 (48.1%) | 0-88 (88.9%) | 66-69 (13.9%) | 66 | 63 | 80 | 66 | 69 | 86 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 60 | 01 | 44 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
