Sweden

Second Stage Round 12: IK Eos - RIG Mark 86-66

Date: April 8, 2017
The game had a very big importance for second-ranked IK Eos as it allowed them to take a leadership position in BEHS forts. IK Eos smashed 6th ranked RIG Mark in Lund 86-66. The game was mostly controlled by IK Eos. RIG Mark managed to win fourth quarter 21-15. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. IK Eos forced 19 RIG Mark turnovers. The best player for the winners was guard Gustav Sundstrom (197-91) who had a double-double by scoring 11 points and 10 rebounds. Point guard Nils Gjorup (177-92) chipped in 11 points and 5 assists. Four IK Eos players scored in double figures. At the other side the best for losing team was forward Kevin Senghore-Peterson (198-98) who recorded 10 points and 8 rebounds and guard Ludvig Johansson (177-98) added 14 points and 4 assists respectively. Both coaches used bench players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. As mentioned above they are alone now at the top position. RIG Mark lost third consecutive game. They keep the sixth place with 13 games lost.

  IK EOS86
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
1 AujdsUQIB, GusUiL 89 4-65 (45%) 6-4 (44.4%) 8-8 (655%) 8 2 65 6 6 5 6 8 5 8 66 64 2
9 GnIQup, Xals 81 4-1 (05%) 6-4 (44.4%) 8-8 (655%) 5 3 3 0 8 5 4 5 5 3 66 68 2
0 bIUFVi, gijaRl 86 6-6 (655%) 4-1 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 8 5 4 5 5 6 66 65 62
64 KilRj, HiBpus 85 4-4 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 6 4 3 6 8 5 6 5 5 4 9 9 69
2 KiQlssIj, PllR 67 5-4 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5 4 4 6 4 5 6 5 5 5 8 -6 1
68 SdijILuQ, KIfa 67 0-66 (30.0%) 5-5 (5%) 8-4 (11.9%) 3 5 3 5 6 5 8 5 5 6 68 7 2
3 KiQILaZ, Sdjij 69 8-0 (35%) 6-4 (44.4%) 8-8 (655%) 4 3 9 4 4 5 6 5 5 3 7 2 62
65 gihlELasU, biQZus 69 8-0 (35%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8 4 0 5 8 5 4 5 5 5 3 0 8
7 HiBBiQsURdU, zIhij 2 8-8 (655%) 6-8 (05%) 6-6 (655%) 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 5
60 bihBIud, wihR 2 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 4 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 1
63 musV, qQaV 9 8-4 (11.9%) 6-3 (80%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 9 3 7
66 PjRBi, CiQl-RQaZ 1 8-8 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 5
wIUil   80-08 (32.6%) 2-81 (45.2%) 68-64 (78.4%) 64 45 34 61 67 5 60 8 5 60 21 28  


  RIG MARK66
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
3 zIhijssIj, vudLaD 80 3-3 (655%) 6-4 (44.4%) 4-3 (90%) 5 6 6 3 8 5 6 5 5 6 63 63 -64
4 ARjDhIQR-ORURQsIj, KRLaj 88 3-1 (11.9%) 5-6 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 8 1 2 8 8 5 5 5 5 4 65 68 -64
46 CJRQipITaZJ, giLad 88 5-4 (5%) 8-1 (44.4%) 8-8 (655%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 6 5 5 4 2 5 -60
43 CiQlsURj, waB 85 8-3 (05%) 5-0 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 5 5 5 6 5 5 0 3 -0 -68
36 KijUJF, XaVlis 85 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 0 3 7 6 6 5 5 5 5 8 5 1 -65
7 vaB, PsViQ 88 5-8 (5%) 4-9 (38.7%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 5 5 6 5 5 6 7 3 5
66 whIQjMlIB, zIhj 67 4-0 (15%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 8 6 5 5 8 5 6 7 65 -9
80 KiQQis, SlRxijdRQ 69 8-3 (05%) 6-0 (85%) 8-8 (655%) 5 3 3 6 8 5 8 5 5 6 7 9 -3
1 CJRQipITaZJ, qddaR 63 6-4 (44.4%) 5-0 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 3 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 -7
65 PLQRMI, PlaLRQ-AalLRaQi 64 5-5 (5%) 5-4 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 6 8 4 5 0 5 5 5 5 8 6 -9 -69
39 vInIjD-SjdiQRi, vidu  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
86 OilBEuasU, PsViQ  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   61-48 (05.5%) 2-42 (86.6%) 65-68 (24.4%) 65 81 41 66 64 5 1 8 5 67 11 36  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)