Taiwan
Quarter-Finals Round 3: KKL - Taiwan Beer 94-60
Date: April 3, 2018
KKL cruised past Taiwan Beer at home court to win the series 3-1. KKL had a 32-20 advantage in offensive rebounds. Their players were unselfish on offense dishing 25 assists comparing to just 11 passes made by Taiwan Beer's players. Worth to mention a quality performance of American-Puerto Rican center Peter Ramos (222-85) who helped to win the game recording a double-double by scoring 27 points, 16 rebounds and 4 assists. Forward Wen-Ping Chang (196-93) helped adding 25 points and 6 rebounds (on 9-of-11 shooting from the field). The best for the losing side was American power forward Walter Sharpe (206-86, college: UAB) with 14 points and 8 rebounds and center Bo-Zhang Su (200-89) scored 12 points. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Quarter-Finals Round 3: KKL - Taiwan Beer 94-60
Date: April 3, 2018
KKL cruised past Taiwan Beer at home court to win the series 3-1. KKL had a 32-20 advantage in offensive rebounds. Their players were unselfish on offense dishing 25 assists comparing to just 11 passes made by Taiwan Beer's players. Worth to mention a quality performance of American-Puerto Rican center Peter Ramos (222-85) who helped to win the game recording a double-double by scoring 27 points, 16 rebounds and 4 assists. Forward Wen-Ping Chang (196-93) helped adding 25 points and 6 rebounds (on 9-of-11 shooting from the field). The best for the losing side was American power forward Walter Sharpe (206-86, college: UAB) with 14 points and 8 rebounds and center Bo-Zhang Su (200-89) scored 12 points. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games.
 KKL94 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 41 | eiBIs, ORURQ | 43 | 66-63 (92.1%) | 6-3 (80%) | 8-3 (05%) | 8 | 63 | 61 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 89 | 49 | 5 |
| 84 | ChRj, zajD-Huij | 80 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| 82 | AURLRj GuajZhiQd | 83 | 4-4 (655%) | 1-2 (90%) | 6-8 (05%) | 4 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 80 | 45 | 5 |
| 7 | ChijD, zujD-Hsuij | 84 | 8-3 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 65 | 2 | 5 |
| 64 | WijD, wia-zaR | 67 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 38 | vu, Kuij-Hsuij | 63 | 5-5 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 5 |
| 2 | ChRj, WRj-HuijD | 63 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 65 | 5 |
| 36 | Au, Ya-zaj | 63 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 5 | va, zai-rajD | 7 | 6-3 (80%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| 8 | vaj, OI-WRa | 1 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| 88 | HuijD, HujD-Hij | 0 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| 68 | Chaj, bajD-ZhajD | 0 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| wIUil | 80-35 (18.0%) | 68-83 (05.5%) | 2-68 (11.9%) | 2 | 48 | 35 | 80 | 61 | 5 | 66 | 3 | 5 | 63 | 73 | 664 | |||
 TAIWAN BEER (coach: Meng-Chu Liu)60 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 66 | HuijD, wsujD-Hij | 46 | 6-1 (61.9%) | 6-1 (61.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | -3 | 5 |
| 76 | Au, mI-chijD | 81 | 1-7 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 68 | 5 |
| 1 | va, Kia-Yij | 88 | 6-0 (85%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| 9 | Yu, Huij-Yi | 86 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 89 | za, WijD-HiI | 67 | 6-3 (80%) | 8-0 (35%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 2 | 5 |
| 38 | AhiQpR, WilURQ | 69 | 0-2 (18.0%) | 6-3 (80%) | 6-6 (655%) | 1 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 66 | 5 |
| 63 | ChaijD, Yu-Sj | 69 | 4-1 (05%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4-4 (655%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 65 | 5 |
| 84 | vu, Cha-baj | 64 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 85 | ChIu, OI-Hsuj | 7 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | -0 | 5 |
| 65 | Chu, Ya-wsujD | 2 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| 27 | ChRj, ChiI | 1 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -3 | 5 |
| 83 | chijD, Yu-laj | 0 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | -4 | 5 |
| wIUil | 67-05 (42.5%) | 0-88 (88.9%) | 9-65 (95.5%) | 60 | 85 | 40 | 66 | 62 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 63 | 15 | 87 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
