Mexico
Regular Season Round 2: Lechugueros - Fuerza Regia 82-85
Date: September 4, 2010
Jeremis Smith (203-F-86, college: Georgia Tech) stepped up for the winners and was totally the best player of this meeting. He spent 40 minutes on the court collecting 28 points and 13 rebounds - valuation 38. Lechugueros had Harold Arceneaux (198-F-77, college: Weber St.) with 23 pts.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 2: Lechugueros - Fuerza Regia 82-85
Date: September 4, 2010
Jeremis Smith (203-F-86, college: Georgia Tech) stepped up for the winners and was totally the best player of this meeting. He spent 40 minutes on the court collecting 28 points and 13 rebounds - valuation 38. Lechugueros had Harold Arceneaux (198-F-77, college: Weber St.) with 23 pts.
 FUERZA REGIA85 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 48 | ABaUh, zRQRBas | 35 | 66-67 (09.7%) | 5-5 (5%) | 1-2 (90%) | 9 | 1 | 64 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 82 | 42 | 5 |
| 33 | AUQIMMR, baZhiRl | 68 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| 1 | wFQIjJaZ, SjdQR zIsRph | 65 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| 84 | GaQIj, GiMQaRl | 0 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| 65 | gR vRIj, SdQaij | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 84-30 (06.6%) | 9-67 (41.2%) | 62-84 (92.4%) | 64 | 89 | 35 | 64 | 85 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 37 | |||
 LECHUGUEROS82 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 1 | zIhjs, eaZVF | 82 | 4-2 (49.0%) | 6-8 (05%) | 1-1 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 60 | 86 | 5 |
| 6 | zRjVajs, ziBil | 89 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 69 | bRjdIJi, PBiQ | 66 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 65 | 5 |
| 65 | AijZhRJ, SdQaij | 66 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 60 | ORQRJ, eIMRQUI | 0 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| 46 | ABaUh, baVR | 41 | 6-3 (80%) | 8-9 (82.1%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 9 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 66 | 61 | 5 |
| 3 | bIss, eFij | 48 | 65-63 (96.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 1 | 3 | 65 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 88 | 81 | 5 |
| 64 | cujaDi, qjQaEuR | 60 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| 61 | ORQRJ, biQZIs | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 9 | eijDRl, qjQaEuR | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 84-05 (31.5%) | 9-62 (42.7%) | 60-83 (18.0%) | 7 | 84 | 48 | 85 | 85 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 28 | 24 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
