Czech Republic
Finals Game 2: CEZ Nymburk - BK Prostejov 88-58
Date: May 21, 2012
The game was mostly controlled by CEZ Nymburk. BK Prostejov managed to win third quarter 20-18. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. CEZ Nymburk dominated down low during the game scoring 58 of its points in the paint compared to BK Prostejov's 24. They outrebounded BK Prostejov 45-26 including a 39-22 advantage in defensive rebounds. CEZ Nymburk looked well-organized offensively handing out 24 assists comparing to just 10 passes made by BK Prostejov's players. Great defensive blocking was one of the keys in this match when CEZ Nymburk made 8 blocks. Swingman Michal Kremen (200-81) scored 18 points and 6 rebounds (on 8-of-10 shooting from the field) to lead the charge for the winners and the former international forward Pavel Pumprla (200-86) chipped in 12 points, 10 rebounds and 4 assists during the contest. Four CEZ Nymburk players scored in double figures. CEZ Nymburk's coach felt very confident that he used 11 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. American Jamar Smith (191-87, college: S.Indiana, agency: KMG Sports Management) responded with 15 points and Slovakian forward Dusan Pandula (196-84) scored 5 points and 5 rebounds.
Top scorers:
CEZ Nymburk: M.Kremen 18+6reb+2ast, P.Pumprla 12+10reb+4ast, M.Lenzly 11+1reb+4ast, P.Benda 10+5reb+1ast, R.Necas 10+6reb+2ast, C.Simmons 9+6reb+6ast
BK Prostejov: J.Smith 15+3reb, V.Bratcenkov 9+2reb+1ast, B.Gadri-Nicholson 6+5reb+2ast, T.Peterson 5+3reb+1ast, D.Pandula 5+5reb+3ast, P.Slezak 5+2reb
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Finals Game 2: CEZ Nymburk - BK Prostejov 88-58
Date: May 21, 2012
The game was mostly controlled by CEZ Nymburk. BK Prostejov managed to win third quarter 20-18. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. CEZ Nymburk dominated down low during the game scoring 58 of its points in the paint compared to BK Prostejov's 24. They outrebounded BK Prostejov 45-26 including a 39-22 advantage in defensive rebounds. CEZ Nymburk looked well-organized offensively handing out 24 assists comparing to just 10 passes made by BK Prostejov's players. Great defensive blocking was one of the keys in this match when CEZ Nymburk made 8 blocks. Swingman Michal Kremen (200-81) scored 18 points and 6 rebounds (on 8-of-10 shooting from the field) to lead the charge for the winners and the former international forward Pavel Pumprla (200-86) chipped in 12 points, 10 rebounds and 4 assists during the contest. Four CEZ Nymburk players scored in double figures. CEZ Nymburk's coach felt very confident that he used 11 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. American Jamar Smith (191-87, college: S.Indiana, agency: KMG Sports Management) responded with 15 points and Slovakian forward Dusan Pandula (196-84) scored 5 points and 5 rebounds.
Top scorers:
CEZ Nymburk: M.Kremen 18+6reb+2ast, P.Pumprla 12+10reb+4ast, M.Lenzly 11+1reb+4ast, P.Benda 10+5reb+1ast, R.Necas 10+6reb+2ast, C.Simmons 9+6reb+6ast
BK Prostejov: J.Smith 15+3reb, V.Bratcenkov 9+2reb+1ast, B.Gadri-Nicholson 6+5reb+2ast, T.Peterson 5+3reb+1ast, D.Pandula 5+5reb+3ast, P.Slezak 5+2reb
 BK PROSTEJOV51 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 68 | ABaUh, ziBiQ | 82 | 4-1 (05%) | 4-1 (05%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 60 | 68 | 5 |
| 0 | mQiUZRjVIL, kInURZh | 82 | 6-3 (80%) | 8-0 (35%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| 9 | ORURQsIj, wQiLas | 80 | 6-3 (80%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 5 |
| 2 | GidQa-XaZhIlsIj, mRQURjDRh | 86 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 5 |
| 7 | ALQdlaV, KiBal | 67 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| 3 | Oijduli, gusij | 62 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 65 | AlRJiV, OiLRl | 60 | 5-3 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | -6 | 5 |
| 60 | ORlaVij, eIsUasliL | 64 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| wIUil | 68-40 (43.4%) | 9-67 (41.2%) | 1-64 (31.8%) | 3 | 88 | 81 | 65 | 85 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 63 | 06 | 44 | |||
 CEZ NYMBURK (coach: Oren Amiel)88 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 64 | AaBBIjs, ChRsURQ | 81 | 4-1 (05%) | 5-0 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 69 | 5 |
| 3 | mRjdi, ORUQ | 83 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 65 | 65 | 5 |
| 1 | OuBpQli, OiLRl | 88 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6 | 7 | 65 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 68 | 85 | 5 |
| 36 | XiFBaZV, SjdQRT | 88 | 4-1 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-0 (35%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 61 | 5 |
| 9 | viTQRjZR, quDRjR | 86 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 68 | XRZis, eidRV | 85 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 4 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 65 | 60 | 5 |
| 7 | KQRBRj, baZhil | 67 | 1-9 (20.9%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 62 | 89 | 5 |
| 43 | vRjJlF, baZhiRl | 62 | 8-8 (655%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 66 | 61 | 5 |
| 0 | AIVIlILsVF, vidasliL | 64 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| 65 | kFIQil, wIBis | 0 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 46 | KQaJ, biQUaj | 3 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| wIUil | 87-31 (14.5%) | 0-60 (44.4%) | 60-89 (00.1%) | 1 | 47 | 30 | 83 | 67 | 5 | 68 | 2 | 5 | 63 | 22 | 689 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
