Mexico

Finals Game 2: Hermosillo - Guaymas 103-87

Date: June 13, 2012
The game was mostly controlled by Rayos de Hermosillo. Ostioneros de Guaymas managed to win second period 29-23. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. They outrebounded Ostioneros de Guaymas 39-21 including a 27-16 advantage in defensive rebounds. It was a great shooting night for Rayos de Hermosillo especially from behind the arc, where they had solid 62.5 percentage. The game was dominated by American players. The best player for the winners was forward Emmanuel Little (196-85, college: N.Dakota) who had a double-double by scoring 34 points (!!!) and 12 rebounds (on 13-of-15 shooting from the field). Forward Patrick Sanders (198-85, college: Cal-Irvine) chipped in 29 points. Little is a former Eurobasket Summer League player, which is considered top international summer league in the market. Forward Jerome Habel (208-85, college: San Diego St.) produced 21 points and guard Haakim Johnson (201-87, college: Pikeville) added 16 points and 7 rebounds respectively for the guests. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. Ostioneros de Guaymas' coach rotated twelve players seeing no chance for a win.
Top scorers:
Hermosillo: E.Little 34+12reb+2ast, P.Sanders 29+3reb+3ast, A.Izaguirre 14+7reb, J.Camacho 12+5reb+1ast, B.Hamilton 7+5reb+8ast, J.Manuel Esteva 7+3reb+3ast
Guaymas: J.Habel 21+4reb, H.Johnson 16+7reb+1ast, A.Pedroza 14+4reb+1ast, M.Allen 13+1reb+9ast, R.Benitez 7, H.Nungaray 6+1reb+7ast
gschID: 177598

  GUAYMAS87
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
86 HiMRl, zRQIBR 43 7-68 (90%) 5-6 (5%) 4-4 (655%) 5 3 3 5 8 5 5 8 5 5 86 86 5
69 zIhjsIj, HiiVaB 87 0-66 (30.0%) 8-3 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 8 0 9 6 8 5 4 5 5 5 61 69 5
66 XujDiQiF, HRZUIQ 87 5-8 (5%) 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 9 4 5 5 5 5 6 1 0 5
65 SllRj, bFQIj 82 6-8 (05%) 8-0 (35%) 0-1 (24.4%) 5 6 6 7 6 5 8 5 5 3 64 60 5
4 ORdQIJi, SjUhIjF 84 6-3 (80%) 4-9 (38.7%) 4-1 (05%) 4 6 3 6 4 5 5 5 5 5 63 1 5
3 CiQQallI, HuDI 60 4-0 (15%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 5 0 5 5 5 5 3 1 -4 5
64 mRjaURJ, yRQjijdI 7 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 4 5 5 5 5 6 5 -4 5
21 AijZhRJ, zIsR 2 6-8 (05%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 -6 5
83 cujaDi, PQlijdI 9 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
60 bIQilRs, oLij 9 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 6 5 5 6 5 -8 5
9 mRjaURJ, eiBsRs 0 4-3 (90%) 5-5 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 9 0 5
6 eRFRs, zRsus 8 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 5
wIUil   83-34 (00.2%) 7-80 (41.5%) 68-61 (90.5%) 0 61 86 62 86 5 1 8 5 68 29 18  


  HERMOSILLO103
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
2 vaUUlR, qBBijuRl 41 68-63 (20.9%) 6-6 (655%) 9-63 (05%) 2 3 68 8 8 5 8 5 5 6 43 42 5
83 HiBalUIj, mQaij 44 8-3 (05%) 6-6 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 5 0 0 2 4 5 8 5 5 4 9 64 5
7 AijdRQs, OiUQaZV 46 3-7 (33.3%) 1-7 (11.9%) 4-0 (15%) 8 6 4 4 6 5 6 5 6 6 87 84 5
68 oJiDuaQQR, SlIjsI 46 1-68 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5 9 9 5 6 5 4 5 6 4 63 64 5
69 qsURLi, zuij bijuRl 89 6-4 (44.4%) 6-8 (05%) 8-8 (655%) 5 4 4 4 3 5 6 5 5 8 9 0 5
60 CiBiZhI, zIQDR 67 4-1 (05%) 6-6 (655%) 4-3 (90%) 8 4 0 6 3 5 5 5 5 8 68 2 5
66 OiliJuRlIs, gijaRl 65 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 5
9 guQiJI, zIsR 7 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 6 4 5 5 5 5 6 5 -8 5
wIUil   82-32 (02.4%) 65-61 (18.0%) 69-82 (15.9%) 68 89 47 62 67 5 65 5 8 64 654 77  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)