Finland
Regular Season Round 14: Pyrinto - Namika Lahti 92-66
Date: November 30, 2012
Leader Tampereen Pyrinto delivered the eleventh victory. This time they crushed 9th ranked Namika Lahti (4-10) 92-66. Tampereen Pyrinto dominated down low during the game scoring 58 of its points in the paint compared to Namika Lahti's 34. Tampereen Pyrinto forced 20 Namika Lahti turnovers. Namika Lahti was plagued by 27 personal fouls down the stretch. American Lamonte Ulmer (198-86, college: Rhode Island) orchestrated the victory by scoring 23 points and 9 rebounds (on 9-of-11 shooting from the field). International forward Carl Lindbom (206-91) contributed with 22 points and 8 rebounds for the winners. American forward Jordan Hasquet (206-85, college: Montana, agency: Dynamics Global Management) replied with 22 points and his fellow American import power forward Louis Johnson (206-86, college: W.Illinois, agency: Pro Partner Sports Management) added 9 points and 10 rebounds in the effort for Namika Lahti. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. Tampereen Pyrinto maintains first position with 11-2 record. Namika Lahti at the other side keeps the ninth place with ten games lost. Both teams do not play next round, which will be an opportunity for some rest.
Top scorers:
Pyrinto: L.Ulmer 23+9reb+1ast, C.Lindbom 22+8reb, O.Ahvenniemi 10+8reb+2ast, A.Lehto 9+1reb+1ast, D.Williams 7+3reb+12ast, J.Niemi 7+4reb
Namika Lahti: J.Hasquet 22+3reb+1ast, C.Latimer 11+6reb+1ast, E.Holloway 10+3reb+5ast, L.Johnson 9+10reb+1ast, V.Heinonen 4+2reb, J.Vaino 4+3reb
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 14: Pyrinto - Namika Lahti 92-66
Date: November 30, 2012
Leader Tampereen Pyrinto delivered the eleventh victory. This time they crushed 9th ranked Namika Lahti (4-10) 92-66. Tampereen Pyrinto dominated down low during the game scoring 58 of its points in the paint compared to Namika Lahti's 34. Tampereen Pyrinto forced 20 Namika Lahti turnovers. Namika Lahti was plagued by 27 personal fouls down the stretch. American Lamonte Ulmer (198-86, college: Rhode Island) orchestrated the victory by scoring 23 points and 9 rebounds (on 9-of-11 shooting from the field). International forward Carl Lindbom (206-91) contributed with 22 points and 8 rebounds for the winners. American forward Jordan Hasquet (206-85, college: Montana, agency: Dynamics Global Management) replied with 22 points and his fellow American import power forward Louis Johnson (206-86, college: W.Illinois, agency: Pro Partner Sports Management) added 9 points and 10 rebounds in the effort for Namika Lahti. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. Tampereen Pyrinto maintains first position with 11-2 record. Namika Lahti at the other side keeps the ninth place with ten games lost. Both teams do not play next round, which will be an opportunity for some rest.
Top scorers:
Pyrinto: L.Ulmer 23+9reb+1ast, C.Lindbom 22+8reb, O.Ahvenniemi 10+8reb+2ast, A.Lehto 9+1reb+1ast, D.Williams 7+3reb+12ast, J.Niemi 7+4reb
Namika Lahti: J.Hasquet 22+3reb+1ast, C.Latimer 11+6reb+1ast, E.Holloway 10+3reb+5ast, L.Johnson 9+10reb+1ast, V.Heinonen 4+2reb, J.Vaino 4+3reb
 NAMIKA LAHTI66 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 2 | HIllITiF, qBBijuRl | 40 | 4-9 (38.7%) | 6-9 (63.4%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 65 | 0 | 5 |
| 83 | viUaBRQ, CRdQaZ | 87 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 66 | 1 | 5 |
| 7 | HisEuRU, zIQdij | 82 | 0-2 (18.0%) | 4-2 (49.0%) | 4-4 (655%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 88 | 60 | 5 |
| 86 | SlijRj, SlRVsa | 89 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-3 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| 60 | zIhjsIj, vIuas | 80 | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 0-9 (96.3%) | 4 | 9 | 65 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 61 | 5 |
| 63 | HRajIjRj, kRsi | 62 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| 68 | kiajI, zIIjis | 63 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| 9 | KIsVajRj, zaBa | 66 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | -7 | 5 |
| 44 | mIIVRQ, ARMisUaij | 3 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| 65 | AhiQRf, SViQ | 8 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 69-44 (06.0%) | 0-89 (62.0%) | 69-84 (94.7%) | 2 | 84 | 46 | 65 | 89 | 86 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 85 | 11 | 47 | |||
 PYRINTO (coach: Tero Hassinen)92 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 48 | WallaiBs, giBIj | 87 | 4-2 (49.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 68 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 61 | 5 |
| 66 | vajdMIB, CiQl | 89 | 0-7 (00.1%) | 8-3 (05%) | 1-68 (05%) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 88 | 85 | 5 |
| 60 | tlBRQ, viBIjUR | 84 | 7-66 (26.2%) | 5-5 (5%) | 0-9 (96.3%) | 4 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 84 | 40 | 5 |
| 3 | vRhUI, SjURQI | 86 | 4-1 (05%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| 2 | XaVVali, SjUUa | 85 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| 35 | ShLRjjaRBa, Plla | 67 | 3-3 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 84 | 5 |
| 63 | XaRBa, zRssR | 67 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
| 68 | ORVVIli, kallR | 62 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-6 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| 46 | OilBa, wIpais | 7 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| 65 | HRajIjRj, PsVu | 2 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 83 | eisajihI, KQasUaij | 4 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| wIUil | 87-39 (16.9%) | 0-63 (40.9%) | 67-44 (09.1%) | 65 | 45 | 35 | 85 | 84 | 80 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 68 | 78 | 661 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
