Sweden
Second Stage Round 2: KFUM Uppsala - IK Eos 86-75
Date: January 16, 2016
Not a big story in a game when IK Eos (1-3) were defeated on the road by KFUM Uppsala (4-1) 86-75 on Saturday. The game was mostly controlled by KFUM Uppsala. IK Eos was better in third quarter 25-23. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. KFUM Uppsala forced 20 IK Eos turnovers. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 23 assists. Guard Lukas Friberg (190-95) scored 18 points and 8 assists to lead the charge for the winners and guard Samuel Eliasson Godonou (185-93) chipped in 15 points and 9 rebounds (on 7-of-9 shooting from the field) during the contest. Four KFUM Uppsala players scored in double figures. KFUM Uppsala's coach used a ten-player rotation and allowed the starting five to get some rest. Point guard Adnan Karovic (188-88) responded with 19 points and 5 assists and David Terins (192-95) scored 23 points and 5 rebounds. KFUM Uppsala will face Talje Knights (#7) on the road in the next round where they are favorite.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Second Stage Round 2: KFUM Uppsala - IK Eos 86-75
Date: January 16, 2016
Not a big story in a game when IK Eos (1-3) were defeated on the road by KFUM Uppsala (4-1) 86-75 on Saturday. The game was mostly controlled by KFUM Uppsala. IK Eos was better in third quarter 25-23. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. KFUM Uppsala forced 20 IK Eos turnovers. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 23 assists. Guard Lukas Friberg (190-95) scored 18 points and 8 assists to lead the charge for the winners and guard Samuel Eliasson Godonou (185-93) chipped in 15 points and 9 rebounds (on 7-of-9 shooting from the field) during the contest. Four KFUM Uppsala players scored in double figures. KFUM Uppsala's coach used a ten-player rotation and allowed the starting five to get some rest. Point guard Adnan Karovic (188-88) responded with 19 points and 5 assists and David Terins (192-95) scored 23 points and 5 rebounds. KFUM Uppsala will face Talje Knights (#7) on the road in the next round where they are favorite.
 IK EOS75 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 0 | wRQajs, giLad | 49 | 7-63 (13.4%) | 6-0 (85%) | 8-0 (35%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 84 | 7 | 5 |
| 3 | GnIQup, Xals | 89 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 66 | 5 |
| 9 | KiQlssIj, PllR | 66 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 2 | bIUFVi, gijaRl | 7 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -8 | 5 |
| 1 | KilRj, HiBpus | 5 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| 63 | SdijILuQ, KIfa | 48 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 65 | KuMQIB, yalBIj | 84 | 5-6 (5%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 3-0 (25%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 67 | 69 | 5 |
| 68 | KiQILaZ, Sdjij | 67 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 4-1 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 67 | 60 | 5 |
| 7 | yQaBij, qQaV | 2 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 66 | PjRBi, CiQl-RQaZ | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 67-40 (03.4%) | 7-85 (30.5%) | 65-61 (18.0%) | 66 | 67 | 89 | 61 | 84 | 5 | 7 | -6 | 5 | 85 | 90 | 05 | |||
 KFUM UPPSALA (coach: Sergi Brugue)86 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 2 | AVFUURLill, wIMais | 87 | 9-65 (95%) | 6-0 (85%) | 4-0 (15%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 85 | 63 | 5 |
| 7 | qnRjsUiB, Ohalap | 81 | 4-0 (15%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 68 | 68 | 5 |
| 0 | qVBij, PsViQ | 61 | 4-4 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 3 | ORQsIj, SlRxijdRQ | 60 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| 1 | cRVILaZ, Slij | 7 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| 64 | yQaMRQD, vuVis | 45 | 0-2 (18.0%) | 6-1 (61.9%) | 0-2 (18.0%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 62 | 61 | 5 |
| 66 | GIdIjIu, AiBuRl qlaissIj | 82 | 9-7 (99.2%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-9 (63.4%) | 4 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 63 | 5 |
| 60 | mRjJRQaijR, yQRdQaV | 82 | 8-8 (655%) | 6-9 (63.4%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 60 | 5 |
| 63 | AUilMRQD, zIjiUhij | 2 | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 5 |
| 68 | qhQjLill, PlaLRQ | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| wIUil | 89-47 (17.8%) | 9-81 (81.7%) | 66-88 (05.5%) | 63 | 88 | 41 | 84 | 62 | 5 | 68 | 8 | 5 | 64 | 21 | 21 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
