China
Quarter-Finals Round 3: Beijing Ducks - Xinjiang FT 117-99
Date: February 19, 2016
Beijing stayed alive in the quarterfinal series. The Ducks outgunned Xinjiang to cut the deficit at 1-2. The game without a history. Beijing Ducks led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. They shot 60.8 percent from the field and made 16-of-19 free shots (84.2 percent) during the game. It was a great shooting night for Beijing Ducks especially from behind the arc, where they had solid 52.4 percentage. The best player for the winners was American guard Stephon Marbury (188-77, college: Georgia Tech) who scored 37 points (!!!) and 6 assists. His fellow American import power forward Randolph Morris (211-86, college: Kentucky) chipped in 28 points and 5 rebounds. At the other side the best for losing team was American-Filipino power forward Andray Blatche (211-86) who recorded 28 points, 8 rebounds and 7 assists and American guard Bryce Cotton (183-92, college: Providence) added 15 points and 5 rebounds respectively. Four Beijing Ducks and five Xinjiang Flying Tige players scored in double figures. Xinjiang Flying Tige's coach rotated ten players seeing no chance for a win.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Quarter-Finals Round 3: Beijing Ducks - Xinjiang FT 117-99
Date: February 19, 2016
Beijing stayed alive in the quarterfinal series. The Ducks outgunned Xinjiang to cut the deficit at 1-2. The game without a history. Beijing Ducks led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. They shot 60.8 percent from the field and made 16-of-19 free shots (84.2 percent) during the game. It was a great shooting night for Beijing Ducks especially from behind the arc, where they had solid 52.4 percentage. The best player for the winners was American guard Stephon Marbury (188-77, college: Georgia Tech) who scored 37 points (!!!) and 6 assists. His fellow American import power forward Randolph Morris (211-86, college: Kentucky) chipped in 28 points and 5 rebounds. At the other side the best for losing team was American-Filipino power forward Andray Blatche (211-86) who recorded 28 points, 8 rebounds and 7 assists and American guard Bryce Cotton (183-92, college: Providence) added 15 points and 5 rebounds respectively. Four Beijing Ducks and five Xinjiang Flying Tige players scored in double figures. Xinjiang Flying Tige's coach rotated ten players seeing no chance for a win.
 BEIJING DUCKS (coach: LiMin Xu)117 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 7 | Auj, YuR | 31 | 6-8 (05%) | 4-1 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 7 | 65 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 62 | 5 |
| 06 | za, chR | 30 | 4-4 (655%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 63 | 5 |
| 4 | biQMuQF, AURphIj | 40 | 66-62 (16.6%) | 4-1 (05%) | 1-9 (20.9%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 49 | 35 | 5 |
| 0 | chijD, rajDpRjD | 40 | 6-6 (655%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 4-4 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 64 | 5 |
| 40 | chijD, AIjDUiI | 63 | 3-3 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| 48 | bIQQas, eijdIlph | 44 | 66-85 (00%) | 5-5 (5%) | 1-9 (20.9%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 82 | 81 | 5 |
| 85 | chia, NaiIZhuij | 80 | 4-0 (15%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 68 | 2 | 5 |
| 44 | WijD, NaiIhua | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | yijD, AhuI | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| wIUil | 43-04 (13.8%) | 66-86 (08.3%) | 61-67 (23.8%) | 2 | 82 | 41 | 62 | 83 | 67 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 60 | 669 | 689 | |||
 XINJIANG FT99 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 5 | mliUZhR, SjdQiF | 47 | 9-63 (05%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 2-7 (22.7%) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 82 | 49 | 5 |
| 2 | vau, WRa | 41 | 4-1 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 65 | 60 | 5 |
| 85 | buhUiQ, NaQRlanaijD | 48 | 5-6 (5%) | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| 7 | chIu, ra | 87 | 0-64 (42.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-4 (655%) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 64 | 63 | 5 |
| 6 | va, GRj | 89 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 6-2 (68.0%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 64 | 3 | 5 |
| 46 | CIUUIj, mQFZR | 89 | 0-68 (36.9%) | 6-3 (80%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 60 | 64 | 5 |
| 9 | Yu, ChijDdIjD | 62 | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 64 | KIQiBMRV, biVhij | 62 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 1 | WijD, vRa | 0 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| 65 | Au, WRa | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| wIUil | 82-15 (31.9%) | 2-81 (45.2%) | 67-81 (94.6%) | 69 | 83 | 36 | 64 | 88 | 85 | 65 | 8 | 5 | 64 | 77 | 74 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
