Poland
Play-Offs Round 1: AZS PCz - Polonia Bytom 68-113
Date: March 12, 2016
Polonia Bytom made 26-of-27 free shots (96.3 percent) during the game, while AZS PCz only scored seven points from the stripe. They outrebounded AZS PCz 44-17 including a 31-13 advantage in defensive rebounds. Polonia Bytom looked well-organized offensively handing out 26 assists. Emil Podkowinski (194-88) nailed 25 points, 5 rebounds and 4 assists for the winning side and center Lukasz Bak (210-81, agency: Promotex) accounted for 16 points and 12 rebounds (on 6-of-7 shooting from the field). Five Polonia Bytom players scored in double figures. Swingman Mateusz Gazarkiewicz (193-91) came up with 17 points and 5 rebounds and forward Tomasz Nogalski (192-79) added 16 points respectively for AZS PCz in the defeat. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Play-Offs Round 1: AZS PCz - Polonia Bytom 68-113
Date: March 12, 2016
Polonia Bytom made 26-of-27 free shots (96.3 percent) during the game, while AZS PCz only scored seven points from the stripe. They outrebounded AZS PCz 44-17 including a 31-13 advantage in defensive rebounds. Polonia Bytom looked well-organized offensively handing out 26 assists. Emil Podkowinski (194-88) nailed 25 points, 5 rebounds and 4 assists for the winning side and center Lukasz Bak (210-81, agency: Promotex) accounted for 16 points and 12 rebounds (on 6-of-7 shooting from the field). Five Polonia Bytom players scored in double figures. Swingman Mateusz Gazarkiewicz (193-91) came up with 17 points and 5 rebounds and forward Tomasz Nogalski (192-79) added 16 points respectively for AZS PCz in the defeat. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games.
 AZS PCZ68 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 69 | GiJiQVaRTaZJ, biURusJ | 45 | 9-65 (95%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4-1 (05%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 69 | 60 | 5 |
| 7 | PQlaVITsVa, baZhil | 45 | 8-0 (35%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 65 | 5 |
| 60 | eFjVaRTaZJ, AJFBIj | 87 | 1-7 (11.9%) | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 65 | 5 |
| 65 | XIDilsVa, wIBisJ | 82 | 3-0 (25%) | 8-9 (82.1%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 61 | 60 | 5 |
| 63 | visJRTsVa, OQJRBFsliT | 89 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| 62 | eisJRTsVa, giTad | 64 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 2 | binZhRQRV, biQZaj | 64 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -3 | 5 |
| 0 | GuadIj, yQijZIas-NiLaRQ | 65 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | -8 | 5 |
| 1 | CRlU, KiZpRQ | 0 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 9 | Hindus, KiZpRQ | 0 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 66 | bFslRV, KQJFsJUIf | 3 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 84-47 (07.5%) | 0-86 (84.2%) | 9-64 (04.7%) | 3 | 64 | 69 | 63 | 83 | 62 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 69 | 12 | 32 | |||
 POLONIA BYTOM (coach: Mariusz Bacik)113 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 60 | OIdVITajsVa, qBal | 89 | 2-60 (04.4%) | 6-6 (655%) | 1-9 (20.9%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 80 | 87 | 5 |
| 63 | miV, vuVisJ | 83 | 1-9 (20.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 0 | 9 | 68 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 61 | 81 | 5 |
| 33 | ARMQili, eifil | 86 | 6-6 (655%) | 4-0 (15%) | 3-3 (655%) | 8 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 81 | 5 |
| 7 | bIQilRTaZJ, baZhil | 85 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 2 | zuQZJFjsVa, OiTRl | 69 | 6-8 (05%) | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 66 | 0 | 5 |
| 65 | GRBMus, wIBisJ | 61 | 4-3 (90%) | 6-6 (655%) | 1-1 (655%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 62 | 5 |
| 9 | WIlV-zijVITsVa, OiTRl | 60 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| 68 | cidRZVa, GQJRDIQJ | 68 | 4-3 (90%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| 1 | OIdDIQsVa, AJFBIj | 68 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| 64 | ChIQiJiV, ziVuM | 66 | 6-6 (655%) | 8-3 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 63 | 5 |
| 3 | AJpFQVi, WInZaRZh | 65 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 0 | AJBadU, ziVuM | 7 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| wIUil | 89-36 (10.7%) | 66-84 (39.2%) | 81-89 (71.4%) | 64 | 46 | 33 | 81 | 62 | 83 | 65 | 8 | 5 | 69 | 664 | 609 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
