Finland
Semi-Finals Game 3: Tapiolan Honka - Namika Lr 96-59
Date: March 22, 2016
The game without a history. Tapiolan Honka led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. Tapiolan Honka outrebounded Namika Lr 59-32 including a 20-5 advantage in offensive rebounds. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 21 assists comparing to just 4 passes made by Namika Lr's players. It was a great evening for guard Topi Halme (195-96) who led his team to a victory scoring 19 points, 7 rebounds and 4 assists. Forward Ilkka Sirola (198-86) helped adding 10 points, 10 rebounds and 4 assists. Tapiolan Honka's coach Ville Neva felt very confident that he used 11 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. The best for the losing side was forward Visa Tarjanne (194-93) with 23 points and 5 rebounds and Russian forward Daniil Karvanen (198-98) scored 10 points and 6 rebounds. Five Tapiolan Honka and four Namika Lr players scored in double figures.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Semi-Finals Game 3: Tapiolan Honka - Namika Lr 96-59
Date: March 22, 2016
The game without a history. Tapiolan Honka led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. Tapiolan Honka outrebounded Namika Lr 59-32 including a 20-5 advantage in offensive rebounds. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 21 assists comparing to just 4 passes made by Namika Lr's players. It was a great evening for guard Topi Halme (195-96) who led his team to a victory scoring 19 points, 7 rebounds and 4 assists. Forward Ilkka Sirola (198-86) helped adding 10 points, 10 rebounds and 4 assists. Tapiolan Honka's coach Ville Neva felt very confident that he used 11 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. The best for the losing side was forward Visa Tarjanne (194-93) with 23 points and 5 rebounds and Russian forward Daniil Karvanen (198-98) scored 10 points and 6 rebounds. Five Tapiolan Honka and four Namika Lr players scored in double figures.
 NAMIKA LR (coach: Aubrey Conerly)59 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 6 | wiQnijjR, kasi | 49 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 3-68 (44.4%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 84 | 86 | 5 |
| 4 | OuaUUajRj, waBa | 89 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 1 | 5 |
| 88 | SiLiBiVa, vissR | 89 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| 1 | biQVVijRj, PUUI | 81 | 6-0 (85%) | 8-3 (05%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 66 | 5 |
| 63 | KiQLijRj, gijaal | 80 | 6-1 (61.9%) | 5-4 (5%) | 2-7 (22.7%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 65 | 60 | 5 |
| 86 | bijUFjRj, AijURQa | 85 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-0 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | -7 | 5 |
| 2 | OuaUUajRj, KiQI | 67 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | -9 | 5 |
| 06 | AIVIlIL, GlRM | 61 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | -4 | 5 |
| wIUil | 66-43 (48.3%) | 2-46 (80.2%) | 64-62 (98.8%) | 0 | 89 | 48 | 3 | 62 | 67 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 63 | 07 | 42 | |||
 TAPIOLAN HONKA (coach: Aapo Heinonen)96 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 64 | HilBR, wIpa | 87 | 8-3 (05%) | 0-9 (96.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 67 | 89 | 5 |
| 43 | GuBBRQus, vissR | 89 | 6-0 (85%) | 3-68 (44.4%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 60 | 65 | 5 |
| 84 | kijnIVa, SjsRlBa | 81 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 0 | 9 | 68 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 68 | 5 |
| 65 | AaQIli, olVVi | 84 | 0-66 (30.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3 | 1 | 65 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 65 | 62 | 5 |
| 2 | ALiQd, wIja | 86 | 8-0 (35%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 65 | 64 | 5 |
| 63 | ziQLajRj, zIuVI | 69 | 6-1 (61.9%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| 7 | kRQUaI, Oiju | 60 | 3-0 (25%) | 4-1 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 69 | 64 | 5 |
| 9 | OilURBii, viuQa | 64 | 8-8 (655%) | 8-0 (35%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 66 | 2 | 5 |
| 05 | GuBBRQus, zuhI | 66 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 4 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 44 | viaUajRj, wRQI | 9 | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | -8 | 5 |
| 48 | qMRlajD, wuIBis | 0 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 5 |
| 0 | kijnIVa, kalniBa | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 85-06 (47.8%) | 69-49 (31.5%) | 0-65 (05.5%) | 85 | 47 | 07 | 86 | 67 | 62 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 60 | 71 | 668 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
