Finland

Semi-Finals Game 2: BC Nokia - Kouvot 86-82

Date: April 15, 2016
BC Nokia topped Kouvot to record the first win in the semifinal series. The hosts trailed by 4 points after three quarters before their 25-17 charge, which allowed them to win the game. BC Nokia outrebounded Kouvot 41-28 including a 17-6 advantage in offensive rebounds. The game was dominated by American players. The best player for the winners was guard Daniel Bailey (196-90, college: Queens, NC) who had a double-double by scoring 29 points and 15 rebounds. Forward David Kravish (208-92, college: California) chipped in 20 points and 9 rebounds. BC Nokia's coach Oliver Vidin used a ten-player rotation in such tough game. Guard David Gonzalvez (193-87, college: Richmond) produced 21 points and guard Kyle Shiloh (190-85, college: Nevada) added 12 points and 4 assists respectively for the guests. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures.

  BC NOKIA86
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
9 AViBI, qldiQ 40 6-0 (85%) 8-9 (82.1%) 6-8 (05%) 4 6 3 0 5 8 6 5 8 4 7 1 5
66 mialRF, gijaRl 48 2-63 (09.6%) 8-4 (11.9%) 9-65 (95%) 2 9 60 4 3 9 4 8 5 6 87 33 5
81 viMILaZ, gQiDij 87 8-1 (44.4%) 8-3 (05%) 6-8 (05%) 6 1 9 4 8 3 4 5 6 3 66 63 5
0 HaQLaVIsVa, HRjQa 81 6-8 (05%) 4-1 (05%) 8-8 (655%) 5 6 6 5 3 6 5 5 6 5 64 1 5
30 KQiLash, giLad 84 65-63 (96.3%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 4 1 7 5 4 5 6 4 5 8 85 83 5
65 biladJij, kuV 84 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 6 5 6 8 3 0 6 5 5 6 8 0 5
69 biUUali, XaVI 67 6-3 (80%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 6 6 5 5 6 6 6 8 -6 5
11 HRQQili, zIja 4 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 5 -8 5
1 eaahRli, waBI 4 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -6 5
2 HiQnuli, zIja 8 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 6 5 -3 5
60 XaVVali, SjUUa  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   84-39 (32.7%) 7-84 (47.6%) 64-62 (98.8%) 69 83 36 63 88 67 7 1 0 63 21 76  


  KOUVOT (coach: Tom Cooman)82
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
65 GIjJilLRJ, giLad 34 7-60 (15%) 5-6 (5%) 4-0 (15%) 6 4 3 4 4 3 5 5 6 8 86 69 5
83 bidsRj, SlRxijdRQ 44 4-3 (90%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 4 4 1 5 3 5 5 3 5 4 7 65 5
66 eaZhiQdsIj, g.z. 46 8-1 (44.4%) 4-1 (05%) 0-1 (24.4%) 5 6 6 5 8 0 6 5 6 5 62 63 5
1 AhalIh, KFlR 45 8-3 (05%) 6-3 (80%) 0-1 (24.4%) 5 3 3 3 4 1 4 5 5 6 68 67 5
64 KiujasUI, kallR 83 8-4 (11.9%) 6-4 (44.4%) 4-4 (655%) 6 0 1 5 6 8 5 6 5 5 65 60 5
38 GapsIj, whIBis 86 3-7 (33.3%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 0 1 8 4 4 5 5 6 4 2 9 5
9 ARppili, oliQa 63 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 4 5 6 5 8 8 5 -9 5
3 HaQLIjRj, wuIBis 65 5-8 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 6-8 (05%) 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 5 6 6 3 6 5
4 AiiQaniQLa, SQUUu  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
86 KjahUajRj, wRRBu  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
68 vuIsBii, baaVVi  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   88-30 (32.7%) 9-69 (36.8%) 69-88 (99.4%) 1 88 82 7 67 86 1 0 1 68 28 91  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)