Spain

Semi-Finals Game 4: Penas Huesca - Burgos 83-72

Date: May 15, 2016
Penas Huesca overcame visiting Burgos and sealed their Leb Gold Finals appearance. The hosts trailed by 1 point at the halftime before their 48-36 charge in the second half, which allowed them to win the game. Lobe Huesca looked well-organized offensively handing out 23 assists. Worth to mention a great performance of Brazilian power forward Daniel Bordignon (206-96) who helped to win the game recording 15 points and 7 rebounds. Lithuanian forward Gabas Maldunas (206-93, college: Dartmouth) contributed with 14 points and 6 rebounds for the winners. Lobe Huesca's coach Quim Costa used a ten-player rotation which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Croatian power forward Filip Toncinic (212-84, college: Texas A&M-CC) replied with 15 points and 9 rebounds and Lithuanian guard Augustas Peciukevicius (192-91) added 11 points and 6 rebounds in the effort for Burgos. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures.

  BURGOS (coach: Bruno Savignani)72
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
2 biQRsZh, SjUIj 46 5-4 (5%) 6-0 (85%) 0-2 (18.0%) 8 4 0 8 8 0 5 5 5 8 2 1 5
7 kRDi, ziLaRQ 45 8-1 (44.4%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 4 5 8 6 5 5 4 3 0 5
68 ORZauVRLaZaus, SuDusUis 89 3-0 (25%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 4 4 1 6 3 8 5 5 6 3 66 7 5
60 biQUajRJ, qduiQdI 89 5-5 (5%) 8-3 (05%) 4-3 (90%) 5 4 4 8 4 8 5 5 5 5 7 65 5
64 wIjZajaZ, yalap 80 1-66 (03.0%) 5-6 (5%) 4-4 (655%) 0 3 7 5 3 3 5 6 6 6 60 69 5
67 yIQjis, eIDRQ 84 4-0 (15%) 8-3 (05%) 6-8 (05%) 5 4 4 5 4 4 6 5 5 8 64 65 5
65 AajaZi, zusUis 62 4-3 (90%) 6-4 (44.4%) 4-4 (655%) 5 8 8 6 3 4 6 5 5 8 68 65 5
9 kalijILi, eIDRQ 63 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 4 6 6 6 5 6 6 5 8 5
wIUil   62-41 (05.5%) 9-85 (40.5%) 60-85 (90.5%) 65 84 44 68 86 88 3 6 4 60 98 17  


  PENAS HUESCA (coach: Rafael Sanz)83
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
65 mIQdaDjIj, gijaRl 87 4-2 (49.0%) 8-3 (05%) 4-3 (90%) 4 3 9 6 8 3 5 5 5 5 60 69 5
68 HusVaZ, GIQij 81 8-0 (35%) 8-0 (35%) 5-8 (5%) 5 5 5 3 4 8 6 5 5 6 65 0 5
66 OiQdaji, zIij 84 5-4 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 4-3 (90%) 6 6 8 3 0 3 5 6 5 5 1 1 5
9 vifuRjUR, zIQDR 88 6-8 (05%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 8 6 4 3 8 8 5 5 5 5 0 65 5
4 AURajiQssIj, SRDaQ 86 3-0 (25%) 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 3 4 8 6 5 5 6 2 7 5
60 bildujis, GiMis 85 1-2 (90%) 5-5 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 3 8 1 6 8 6 4 8 6 5 63 88 5
63 gaiJ, CQasUaij 67 6-1 (61.9%) 8-8 (655%) 8-8 (655%) 5 6 6 4 6 0 5 5 5 6 65 68 5
0 CIlIB, GuallRB 69 8-4 (11.9%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 8 8 5 8 5 5 5 9 2 5
3 giLas, KQas 63 6-6 (655%) 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 5 8 6 6 5 5 6 2 1 5
7 OIQUilRJ, biQZIs 4 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
wIUil   85-36 (32.2%) 66-89 (35.9%) 65-63 (96.3%) 66 63 80 84 88 86 2 4 6 3 24 70  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)