Poland

Quarter-Finals Round 3: Pogon Prudnik - Sokol Lancut 59-73

Date: April 22, 2017
Sokol Lancut advanced into the semifinal stage following a comfortable road win over Pogon Prudnik. Sokol Lancut dominated down low during the game scoring 58 of its points in the paint compared to Pogon Prudnik's 26. They outrebounded Pogon Prudnik 48-28 including a 40-22 advantage in defensive rebounds. The best player for the winners was power forward Rafal Kulikowski (205-85, agency: Promotex) who had a double-double by scoring 19 points and 12 rebounds (on 9-of-11 shooting from the field). Guard Sebastian Szymanski (183-91, agency: Promotex) chipped in 16 points and 6 rebounds. At the other side the best for losing team was Tomasz Prostak (188-88, agency: Octagon Europe) who recorded 18 points and 8 rebounds and center Tomasz Nowakowski (207-90) added 10 points and 7 rebounds respectively.

  POGON PRUDNIK (coach: Marcin Radomski)59
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
63 XITiVITsVa, wIBisJ 43 3-9 (09.6%) 5-4 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 3 4 9 8 6 6 3 8 5 3 65 60 -61
7 mIDdijITaZJ, OiTRl 44 5-3 (5%) 6-9 (63.4%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 4 8 5 6 5 5 6 4 -8 -9
68 bQIZJRV-wQusVITsVa, SdQaij 48 4-9 (38.7%) 4-9 (38.7%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 8 1 6 5 5 6 60 64 -60
83 OQIsUiV, wIBisJ 89 4-0 (15%) 3-2 (05%) 5-6 (5%) 6 9 2 8 3 4 5 6 6 5 62 85 -0
40 KQiTaRZ, baZhil 81 6-4 (44.4%) 6-3 (80%) 6-8 (05%) 5 4 4 5 6 8 6 5 6 8 1 8 -0
66 bIQdJiV, GQJRDIQJ 85 8-0 (35%) 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 4 0 6 5 5 5 6 3 -8 -68
69 miQUVITaiV, ziQIsliT 68 5-4 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -6 -0
62 KunIj, XIQMRQU 66 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 4 -9
9 mQisJVi, giTad  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
1 bIQiTaRZ, giTad  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   64-43 (42.8%) 65-40 (82.1%) 4-0 (15.5%) 1 88 82 68 61 63 9 4 8 7 07 32  


  SOKOL LANCUT (coach: Dariusz Kaszowski)73
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
4 AJFBijsVa, ARMisUaij 49 1-63 (38.7%) 6-1 (61.9%) 6-6 (655%) 6 0 1 4 6 3 6 6 8 8 61 64 66
64 AQIVi, biQZaj 46 3-1 (11.9%) 5-4 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 1 1 8 8 8 6 5 5 6 7 66 6
65 KIsJuUi, zRQJF 87 8-9 (82.1%) 5-5 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5 3 3 6 6 4 8 5 5 8 0 0 1
1 KulaVITsVa, eifil 82 7-65 (75%) 5-6 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 1 1 68 8 4 4 8 5 5 8 67 45 7
66 CJunVITsVa, Slij 80 6-8 (05%) 6-3 (80%) 8-8 (655%) 5 0 0 4 8 6 6 6 5 3 9 2 9
7 KQinjaRTsVa, KQJFsJUIf 85 4-4 (655%) 5-0 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 6 1 9 5 8 8 5 5 6 6 2 2 6
44 miliTRjdRQ, ziZRV 60 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 3 8 5 5 5 5 6 5 8 69
60 KlaBi, biZaRn 2 4-4 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 65 69
76 CJRQTIjVi, miQUIsJ 8 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5 8 8 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 4 0 4
83 musJUi, OiUQFV  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   87-39 (16.9%) 8-67 (65.0%) 7-64 (17.8%) 2 35 32 60 63 61 9 8 4 64 94 78  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)