Czech Republic
Semi-Finals Game 1: CEZ Nymburk - BK Opava 100-64
Date: May 2, 2017
CEZ Nymburk beat BK Opava to take 1-0 lead in the series. CEZ Nymburk dominated down low during the game scoring 66 of its points in the paint compared to BK Opava's 20. CEZ Nymburk forced 21 BK Opava turnovers and outrebounded them 43-31 including a 36-24 advantage in defensive rebounds. Their players were unselfish on offense dishing 32 assists comparing to just 17 passes made by BK Opava's players. American power forward Kenny Hall (206-90, college: Tennessee) nailed 18 points and 7 rebounds for the winning side and international forward Martin Kriz (200-93) accounted for 14 points and 8 rebounds. Four CEZ Nymburk players scored in double figures. CEZ Nymburk's coach Ronen Ginzburg felt very confident that he used 11 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Viktor Cvek (200-89) came up with 15 points and point guard Radovan Kouril (185-95) added 12 points and 5 assists respectively for BK Opava in the defeat.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Semi-Finals Game 1: CEZ Nymburk - BK Opava 100-64
Date: May 2, 2017
CEZ Nymburk beat BK Opava to take 1-0 lead in the series. CEZ Nymburk dominated down low during the game scoring 66 of its points in the paint compared to BK Opava's 20. CEZ Nymburk forced 21 BK Opava turnovers and outrebounded them 43-31 including a 36-24 advantage in defensive rebounds. Their players were unselfish on offense dishing 32 assists comparing to just 17 passes made by BK Opava's players. American power forward Kenny Hall (206-90, college: Tennessee) nailed 18 points and 7 rebounds for the winning side and international forward Martin Kriz (200-93) accounted for 14 points and 8 rebounds. Four CEZ Nymburk players scored in double figures. CEZ Nymburk's coach Ronen Ginzburg felt very confident that he used 11 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Viktor Cvek (200-89) came up with 15 points and point guard Radovan Kouril (185-95) added 12 points and 5 assists respectively for BK Opava in the defeat.
 BK OPAVA (coach: David Zach)64 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 83 | AaQaji, ziVuM | 89 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-7 (66.6%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| 60 | munjIZh, kiZliL | 81 | 6-0 (85%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| 1 | KlRZVi, eidaB | 83 | 6-1 (61.9%) | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 66 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | CLRV, kaVUIQ | 84 | 4-1 (05%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 68 | 5 |
| 86 | KIuQal, eidILij | 84 | 4-3 (90%) | 8-9 (82.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 68 | 7 | 5 |
| 3 | gQiDIuj, eIsUasliL | 86 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | -8 | 5 |
| 66 | mliJRV, ziVuM | 85 | 6-3 (80%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 68 | KLipal, baQIsliL | 69 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| 7 | cMQijRV, yalap | 61 | 5-8 (5%) | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | -0 | 5 |
| wIUil | 65-48 (46.4%) | 64-35 (48.0%) | 0-2 (18.0%) | 9 | 83 | 46 | 69 | 62 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 86 | 13 | 47 | |||
 CEZ NYMBURK (coach: Oren Amiel)100 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 46 | KQaJ, biQUaj | 83 | 1-2 (90%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 63 | 86 | 5 |
| 85 | Hill, KRjjF | 84 | 9-66 (14.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-0 (25%) | 5 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 62 | 80 | 5 |
| 9 | HQuMij, kInURZh | 84 | 4-4 (655%) | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 64 | 5 |
| 63 | HIlU, AURphRj | 88 | 6-0 (85%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 66 | 5 |
| 5 | SllRj, mQFIj | 86 | 8-3 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5-3 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 65 | 62 | 5 |
| 7 | WRlsZh, zaQa | 85 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 64 | 5 |
| 65 | viTQRjZR, quDRjR | 61 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 65 | 64 | 5 |
| 3 | mRjdi, ORUQ | 63 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 64 | 85 | 5 |
| 64 | ORURQVi, biQUaj | 63 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 65 | 5 |
| 84 | AijU-eIIs, HITiQd | 64 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 68 | 5 |
| 86 | bRaRQ, wIjF | 4 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| wIUil | 44-08 (14.0%) | 9-69 (36.8%) | 64-85 (10.5%) | 9 | 41 | 34 | 48 | 7 | 62 | 61 | 4 | 5 | 66 | 655 | 601 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
