Poland

1/8 Finals Round 3: Slask 2 Wroclaw - Domino Inowr. 78-55

Date: April 18, 2018
Slask 2 Wroclaw dominated down low during the game scoring 44 of its points in the paint compared to Domino Inowr.'s 24. Slask 2 Wroclaw forced 19 Domino Inowr. turnovers and outrebounded them 46-33 including 34 on the defensive glass. Worth to mention a quality performance of forward Mateusz Stawiak (203-96) who helped to win the game recording 14 points and 8 rebounds. Forward Tomasz Zelezniak (198-98) helped adding 9 points and 12 rebounds. Slask 2 Wroclaw's coach felt very confident that he used 10 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. The best for the losing side was swingman Juliusz Baranski (196-96) with a double-double by scoring 10 points and 11 rebounds and point guard Michal Warchowski (187-94) scored 7 points, 6 rebounds and 7 assists.

  DOMINO INOWR.55
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
65 WiQZhITsVa, baZhil 35 6-4 (44.4%) 5-6 (5%) 0-1 (24.4%) 5 1 1 9 8 9 8 5 6 1 9 61 -84
44 KIQIlZJFV, gijaRl 40 4-1 (05%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 5 6 8 5 5 5 4 7 1 -81
66 miQijsVa, zulausJ 44 8-2 (80%) 8-0 (35%) 5-3 (5%) 6 65 66 5 6 4 4 5 6 8 65 65 -62
63 KIJlITsVa, KQJFsJUIf 48 6-6 (655%) 8-0 (35%) 6-8 (05%) 5 3 3 6 3 6 5 5 5 6 7 1 -84
43 AIlUFsaiV, GQJRDIQJ 80 4-64 (84.6%) 5-5 (5%) 3-1 (11.9%) 8 4 0 5 8 3 6 5 6 4 65 8 -87
7 eIsajsVa, KQFsUaij 61 5-8 (5%) 5-4 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5 5 5 6 6 8 5 5 5 6 8 -8 -8
0 binRQ, biQZaj 2 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 8 8 5 0 6 5 5 5 4 4 -0 8
2 zijVITsVa, HuMRQU 3 6-6 (655%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 9 4
85 XaniV, KiZpRQ 4 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6
9 KIjaRZJVi, KiBal  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   68-49 (48.3%) 1-69 (40.4%) 64-88 (07.6%) 4 45 44 7 61 85 1 5 4 67 00 35  


  SLASK 2 WROCLAW (coach: Jacek Krzykala)78
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
84 bilRsi, zij 82 4-2 (49.0%) 5-8 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 8 8 9 6 3 5 5 5 8 9 7 81
67 WalZJRV, gIBajaV 89 4-4 (655%) 4-1 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 6 8 6 6 5 5 8 60 68 46
86 ciDIQsVa, biVsFBalaij 81 0-65 (05%) 6-6 (655%) 6-8 (05%) 8 1 2 8 6 6 8 5 5 8 63 62 81
1 AUiTaiV, biURusJ 80 0-2 (18.0%) 5-3 (5%) 3-0 (25%) 6 9 2 8 6 0 6 6 5 8 63 85 86
4 cRlRJjaiV, wIBisJ 80 5-3 (5%) 4-1 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 4 7 68 4 8 8 4 6 5 8 7 67 65
83 mIJRjVI, ARMisUaij 62 6-2 (68.0%) 5-8 (5%) 4-3 (90%) 5 6 6 6 3 8 8 5 5 8 0 -0 8
3 KIJlITsVa, oDIQ 62 8-4 (11.9%) 5-4 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 8 4 0 8 4 6 5 5 5 8 0 3 8
60 AisaV, baZhil 63 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 6 4 5 5 6 5 6 8 3 0
0 CJRBpaRl, biURusJ 7 5-5 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 8 -3
62 wIBZJiV, AJFBIj 1 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 4 6 3 6 4 5 6 5 5 6 3 0 -3
wIUil   88-32 (30.2%) 2-89 (87.1%) 65-63 (96.3%) 68 43 31 85 85 61 65 4 5 61 92 22  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)