Poland
Regular Season Round 21: Notec Inowr. - Ogniwo Szczecin 121-68
Date: February 9, 2019
Not a big story in a game in Inowroclaw where 10th ranked Ogniwo Szczecin (6-14) was outplayed by third ranked Notec Inowr. (15-5) 121-68 on Saturday. Notec Inowr. shot 64.8 percent from the field. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 35 assists comparing to just 15 passes made by Ogniwo Szczecin's players. The best player for the winners was center Wojciech Zurawski (202-76) who scored 28 points and 8 rebounds (on 12-of-14 shooting from the field). Guard Adrian Barszczyk (190-92) chipped in 16 points and 6 assists. Four Notec Inowr. players scored in double figures. Notec Inowr.'s coach felt very confident that he used 11 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. At the other side the best for losing team was guard Marcin Zarzeczny (195-87) who recorded 20 points, 9 rebounds, 4 assists and 4 steals and center Karol Pytys (202-85) added 21 points and 11 rebounds respectively. Notec Inowr. moved-up to second place, which they share with Tur Bielsk Pdl. Newly promoted Ogniwo Szczecin keeps the tenth position with 14 games lost. Notec Inowr.'s supporters look forward to an exciting derby game next round, where their team will travel locally in Inowroclaw to the arena Domino Inowr..
Top scorers:
Notec Inowr.: W.Zurawski 28+8reb+3ast, M.Marciniak 21+3ast, A.Barszczyk 16+2reb+6ast, P.Robak 13+3reb, M.Kowalewski 12+7reb+4ast, S.Grzesinski 12+1reb+3ast
Ogniwo Szczecin: K.Pytys 21+11reb, M.Zarzeczny 20+9reb+4ast, P.Knowa 13+5reb+2ast, M.Ostrowski 9+2reb+7ast, R.Szatkowski 5+2reb+1ast, K.Piotr 0+1reb+1ast
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 21: Notec Inowr. - Ogniwo Szczecin 121-68
Date: February 9, 2019
Not a big story in a game in Inowroclaw where 10th ranked Ogniwo Szczecin (6-14) was outplayed by third ranked Notec Inowr. (15-5) 121-68 on Saturday. Notec Inowr. shot 64.8 percent from the field. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 35 assists comparing to just 15 passes made by Ogniwo Szczecin's players. The best player for the winners was center Wojciech Zurawski (202-76) who scored 28 points and 8 rebounds (on 12-of-14 shooting from the field). Guard Adrian Barszczyk (190-92) chipped in 16 points and 6 assists. Four Notec Inowr. players scored in double figures. Notec Inowr.'s coach felt very confident that he used 11 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. At the other side the best for losing team was guard Marcin Zarzeczny (195-87) who recorded 20 points, 9 rebounds, 4 assists and 4 steals and center Karol Pytys (202-85) added 21 points and 11 rebounds respectively. Notec Inowr. moved-up to second place, which they share with Tur Bielsk Pdl. Newly promoted Ogniwo Szczecin keeps the tenth position with 14 games lost. Notec Inowr.'s supporters look forward to an exciting derby game next round, where their team will travel locally in Inowroclaw to the arena Domino Inowr..
Top scorers:
Notec Inowr.: W.Zurawski 28+8reb+3ast, M.Marciniak 21+3ast, A.Barszczyk 16+2reb+6ast, P.Robak 13+3reb, M.Kowalewski 12+7reb+4ast, S.Grzesinski 12+1reb+3ast
Ogniwo Szczecin: K.Pytys 21+11reb, M.Zarzeczny 20+9reb+4ast, P.Knowa 13+5reb+2ast, M.Ostrowski 9+2reb+7ast, R.Szatkowski 5+2reb+1ast, K.Piotr 0+1reb+1ast
 NOTEC INOWR. (coach: Krzysztof Szubarga)121 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 63 | cuQiTsVa, WInZaRZh | 89 | 68-63 (20.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-9 (09.6%) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 82 | 47 | 36 |
| 6 | maRQTiDRj, biURusJ | 81 | 6-6 (655%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 66 | 49 |
| 9 | KITilRTsVa, biQZaj | 80 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8-0 (35%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 67 | 35 |
| 64 | biQZajaiV, biURusJ | 88 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 0-65 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 86 | 67 | 44 |
| 80 | yalapaiV, SlRVsijdRQ | 86 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 86 | 62 |
| 0 | miQsJZJFV, SdQaij | 85 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 8-3 (05%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 61 | 61 | 47 |
| 85 | eIMiV, OiTRl | 60 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 4-4 (655%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 64 | 69 | 61 |
| 4 | GQJRsajsVa, ARMisUaij | 60 | 4-3 (90%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 68 | 68 | 84 |
| 3 | KQRUVITsVa, wIBisJ | 2 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 1 | gudi, WInZaRZh | 2 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 3 |
| 66 | XilRTin, biZaRn | 2 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| wIUil | 45-47 (91.7%) | 61-48 (05.5%) | 64-85 (10.5%) | 7 | 81 | 40 | 40 | 85 | 69 | 61 | 3 | 6 | 64 | 686 | 618 | |||
 OGNIWO SZCZECIN68 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 82 | PsUQITsVa, baZhil | 49 | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-4 (5%) | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 | -37 |
| 44 | KjITi, OaIUQ | 44 | 3-65 (35%) | 6-0 (85%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 4 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 64 | 7 | -00 |
| 63 | OFUFs, KiQIl | 46 | 65-61 (18.0%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 0 | 1 | 66 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 86 | 85 | -47 |
| 0 | AJiUVITsVa, eIMRQU | 82 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-3 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 6 | -40 |
| 60 | ciQJRZJjF, biQZaj | 89 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 5-8 (5%) | 65-63 (96.3%) | 3 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 85 | 82 | -87 |
| 9 | euVs, OiUQFV | 62 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | -8 | -88 |
| 7 | ORQRaQi, HuMRQU | 68 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -67 |
| 37 | KITilsVa, OaIUQ | 7 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -69 |
| wIUil | 83-39 (06.6%) | 6-69 (0.7%) | 69-45 (01.9%) | 63 | 86 | 40 | 60 | 69 | 85 | 66 | 6 | 3 | 69 | 12 | 15 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
