Sweden
Regular Season Round 22: RIG Mark - Hogsbo 84-89
Date: March 12, 2022
Not a big story in a game in Kinna where 7th ranked RIG Mark (10-12) was defeated by third ranked Hogsbo (16-6) 89-84 on Saturday. Hogsbo dominated down low during the game scoring 56 of its points in the paint compared to RIG Mark's 36. Strangely RIG Mark outrebounded Hogsbo 52-35 including 19 on the offensive glass. Croatian power forward Tony Vitali (203-1991) fired a double-double by scoring 20 points and 14 rebounds for the winners. Forward Filip Sjostrom (200-1990) chipped in 19 points and 6 rebounds. Four Hogsbo players scored in double figures. Forward Oliver Cupan (194-2002) produced 33 points (!!!) and forward Felix Brostrom (201-2003) added 8 points and 13 rebounds respectively for lost side. Both coaches used bench players in such tough game. Hogsbo maintains third position with 16-6 record having six points less than leader KFUM Uppsala. Loser RIG Mark keeps the seventh place with 12 games lost.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 22: RIG Mark - Hogsbo 84-89
Date: March 12, 2022
Not a big story in a game in Kinna where 7th ranked RIG Mark (10-12) was defeated by third ranked Hogsbo (16-6) 89-84 on Saturday. Hogsbo dominated down low during the game scoring 56 of its points in the paint compared to RIG Mark's 36. Strangely RIG Mark outrebounded Hogsbo 52-35 including 19 on the offensive glass. Croatian power forward Tony Vitali (203-1991) fired a double-double by scoring 20 points and 14 rebounds for the winners. Forward Filip Sjostrom (200-1990) chipped in 19 points and 6 rebounds. Four Hogsbo players scored in double figures. Forward Oliver Cupan (194-2002) produced 33 points (!!!) and forward Felix Brostrom (201-2003) added 8 points and 13 rebounds respectively for lost side. Both coaches used bench players in such tough game. Hogsbo maintains third position with 16-6 record having six points less than leader KFUM Uppsala. Loser RIG Mark keeps the seventh place with 12 games lost.
 HOGSBO89 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 88 | kaUila, wIjF | 43 | 2-68 (11.9%) | 5-8 (5%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 0 | 7 | 63 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 85 | 81 | 5 |
| 61 | AnIsUQIB, yalap | 48 | 2-68 (11.9%) | 5-3 (5%) | 4-0 (15%) | 3 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 67 | 63 | 5 |
| 4 | vujdsURdU, qBal | 45 | 8-3 (05%) | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 64 | 65 | 5 |
| 86 | KiQQis, SlRxijdRQ | 84 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 4-9 (38.7%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 67 | 68 | 5 |
| 2 | WadBiQV, vuVis | 62 | 8-0 (35%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 5 |
| 8 | SjdRQssIj, PllR | 62 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-0 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 65 | KahlBij, HRQBij | 61 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 0 | HRllDQRj, yalap | 63 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | -6 | 5 |
| 3 | viQssIj, HiQQF | 66 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 63 | CQIIji, vITR | 7 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 68 | SpRll, giLad | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 82-33 (14.1%) | 2-40 (88.7%) | 7-60 (15.5%) | 68 | 84 | 40 | 63 | 69 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 66 | 27 | 95 | |||
 RIG MARK84 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 1 | Cupij, PlaLRQ | 49 | 3-2 (05%) | 9-66 (14.1%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 44 | 46 | 5 |
| 2 | gRlQFd, bRlVRQ | 43 | 1-65 (15%) | 5-1 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 9 | 5 |
| 88 | mQIsUQIB, yRlax | 48 | 8-9 (82.1%) | 5-0 (5%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 3 | 7 | 64 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 44 | CIllaRQ, zixIj | 84 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 6 | KlajUBij, baVia | 69 | 6-3 (80%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 4 | SjdRQssIj, bix | 69 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 7 | KiQQis, yalap | 61 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 5 |
| 65 | CildTRll, qllaIU | 68 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-0 (85%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | -1 | 5 |
| 69 | mIdajDh, kalhRlB | 68 | 5-8 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| 49 | biQURjsIj, KispiQ | 9 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 65 | 5 |
| 5 | bFQUhal, gijUR | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 60 | zIjssIj, waB | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 62-36 (34.7%) | 66-40 (46.3%) | 60-86 (96.3%) | 67 | 44 | 08 | 68 | 61 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 69 | 23 | 12 | |||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#22 TONY VITALI
|
COMPARE PLAYERS | #6 OLIVER CUPAN
|
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
