Finland
Regular Season Round 24: Espoo Team - Catz 62-81
Date: February 19, 2011
An exciting game between Top Four teams was played in Espoo. Second ranked Catz Lappeenranta faced 4th ranked Espoo Team. Guests from Lappeenranta (15-9) smashed host Espoo Team (13-9) 81-62. The game was mostly controlled by Catz Lappeenranta. Espoo Team was better in second period 19-16. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. Catz Lappeenranta forced 20 Espoo Team turnovers. It was a good game for American forward Lisa Lee (183-84, college: Charleston) who led her team to a victory with 19 points and 9 rebounds. Russian center Elizaveta Kityzina (195-80) contributed with 8 points and 9 rebounds for the winners. International power forward Niina Laaksonen (185-85) replied with 12 points and 9 rebounds and guard Venlakaisa Holtta (178-84) added 15 points in the effort for Espoo Team. Four Espoo Team players scored in double figures. Defending champion maintains second position with 15-9 record having just one points less than leader PeKa. Espoo Team at the other side keeps the fourth place with nine games lost. Catz Lappeenranta will play against bottom-ranked Kerava Energia Team (#8) at home in the next round where they are favorite. Espoo Team will play against Forssan Alku (#6) and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
Top scorers:
Espoo Team: V.Holtta 15+4reb+1ast, L.Wilson 12+5reb+1ast, N.Laaksonen 12+9reb+2ast, E.Iiskola 10+6reb, A.Holopainen 7+1ast, M.Lahde 2+5reb+2ast
Catz: L.Lee 19+9reb+2ast, R.Piipari 14+1reb+3ast, H.Vapamaa 14, E.Reshetko 13+5reb, V.Kesanen 9+2reb+3ast, E.Kityzina 8+9reb+2ast
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 24: Espoo Team - Catz 62-81
Date: February 19, 2011
An exciting game between Top Four teams was played in Espoo. Second ranked Catz Lappeenranta faced 4th ranked Espoo Team. Guests from Lappeenranta (15-9) smashed host Espoo Team (13-9) 81-62. The game was mostly controlled by Catz Lappeenranta. Espoo Team was better in second period 19-16. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. Catz Lappeenranta forced 20 Espoo Team turnovers. It was a good game for American forward Lisa Lee (183-84, college: Charleston) who led her team to a victory with 19 points and 9 rebounds. Russian center Elizaveta Kityzina (195-80) contributed with 8 points and 9 rebounds for the winners. International power forward Niina Laaksonen (185-85) replied with 12 points and 9 rebounds and guard Venlakaisa Holtta (178-84) added 15 points in the effort for Espoo Team. Four Espoo Team players scored in double figures. Defending champion maintains second position with 15-9 record having just one points less than leader PeKa. Espoo Team at the other side keeps the fourth place with nine games lost. Catz Lappeenranta will play against bottom-ranked Kerava Energia Team (#8) at home in the next round where they are favorite. Espoo Team will play against Forssan Alku (#6) and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
Top scorers:
Espoo Team: V.Holtta 15+4reb+1ast, L.Wilson 12+5reb+1ast, N.Laaksonen 12+9reb+2ast, E.Iiskola 10+6reb, A.Holopainen 7+1ast, M.Lahde 2+5reb+2ast
Catz: L.Lee 19+9reb+2ast, R.Piipari 14+1reb+3ast, H.Vapamaa 14, E.Reshetko 13+5reb, V.Kesanen 9+2reb+3ast, E.Kityzina 8+9reb+2ast
 CATZ81 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 9 | vRR, vasi | 41 | 9-64 (04.2%) | 5-4 (5%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 6 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 67 | 86 | 5 |
| 3 | OaapiQa, eRRUUi | 41 | 4-0 (15%) | 8-7 (88.8%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 63 | 68 | 5 |
| 7 | KRsijRj, kalBi | 44 | 5-3 (5%) | 4-1 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| 60 | KaUFJaji, qlaJiLRUi | 87 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 4 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 68 | 5 |
| 64 | eRshRUVI, qlRji | 86 | 3-3 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 64 | 62 | 5 |
| 68 | kipiBii, Hijji | 85 | 5-6 (5%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 68 | 5 |
| 2 | wuuQR, Kiasi | 65 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 85 | zillia, KRQUUu | 2 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 65 | kilUiViQa, Kiasi | 3 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 66 | KRsijRj, kalni | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 63 | KIsVajRj, Oaai | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 67-43 (00.7%) | 65-82 (40.9%) | 64-61 (26.4%) | 9 | 80 | 48 | 66 | 60 | 5 | 60 | 3 | 5 | 60 | 26 | 23 | |||
 ESPOO TEAM62 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 7 | HIlUUi, kRjliViasi | 35 | 4-9 (38.7%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 60 | 60 | 5 |
| 64 | viiVsIjRj, Xaaji | 41 | 3-66 (41.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-0 (25%) | 0 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 68 | 61 | 5 |
| 66 | WalsIj, viuQi | 40 | 4-2 (49.0%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 68 | 2 | 5 |
| 80 | oasVIli, qLaUi | 81 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 65 | 66 | 5 |
| 84 | vihdR, biani | 85 | 6-1 (61.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 83 | HIlIpiajRj, SjjaVi | 69 | 8-3 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 5 |
| 60 | biVaUilI, Sjja | 63 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 65 | kiQR, AiiQi | 7 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 68 | HiuVVILiiQi, eaUi | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 62-31 (47.6%) | 1-64 (31.8%) | 2-7 (22.7%) | 7 | 88 | 46 | 2 | 64 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 85 | 18 | 00 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
