Taiwan
Regular Season Round 4: Pure Youth - KKL 86-75
Date: January 7, 2012
Rather predictable result when second ranked Pure Youth (6-3) won against 6th ranked KKL (3-5) 86-75 on Saturday. Pure Youth trailed by 1 point at the halftime before their 54-42 charge in the second half, which allowed them to win the game. Pure Youth had a 33-22 advantage in offensive rebounds. Worth to mention a great performance of American power forward Quincy Davis (206-83, college: Tulane) who helped to win the game recording a double-double by scoring 22 points, 13 rebounds and 5 blocks. The former international swingman Hsin-An Chen (196-80) contributed with 18 points and 4 assists for the winners. Four Pure Youth players scored in double figures. Pure Youth's coach Chin-Tse Hsu used an eleven-player rotation which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. The former international center Wei-Fang Shang (196-78) replied with 24 points and American power forward Tim Parham (206-83, college: Md-E Shore) added 17 points and 10 rebounds in the effort for KKL. Pure Youth have a solid four-game winning streak. They maintain second position with 6-3 record behind leader Dacin Tigers. KKL lost fourth consecutive game. They dropped to the fifth place with five games lost. Pure Youth will face Taiwan Mobile (#6) in the next round. KKL will play against the league's leader Dacin Tigers.
Top scorers:
Pure Youth: Q.Davis 22+13reb+1ast, H.Chen 18+4reb+4ast, D.Creighton 14+3reb+3ast, C.Ke 12+6reb+2ast, T.Lin 6+4reb+2ast, S.Chen 4+1reb+1ast
KKL: W.Shang 24+4reb+3ast, C.Liu 19+2reb, T.Parham 17+10reb+2ast, C.Lee 8+6reb+1ast, C.Hung 5+5reb+1ast, O.Week 2+4reb+4ast
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 4: Pure Youth - KKL 86-75
Date: January 7, 2012
Rather predictable result when second ranked Pure Youth (6-3) won against 6th ranked KKL (3-5) 86-75 on Saturday. Pure Youth trailed by 1 point at the halftime before their 54-42 charge in the second half, which allowed them to win the game. Pure Youth had a 33-22 advantage in offensive rebounds. Worth to mention a great performance of American power forward Quincy Davis (206-83, college: Tulane) who helped to win the game recording a double-double by scoring 22 points, 13 rebounds and 5 blocks. The former international swingman Hsin-An Chen (196-80) contributed with 18 points and 4 assists for the winners. Four Pure Youth players scored in double figures. Pure Youth's coach Chin-Tse Hsu used an eleven-player rotation which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. The former international center Wei-Fang Shang (196-78) replied with 24 points and American power forward Tim Parham (206-83, college: Md-E Shore) added 17 points and 10 rebounds in the effort for KKL. Pure Youth have a solid four-game winning streak. They maintain second position with 6-3 record behind leader Dacin Tigers. KKL lost fourth consecutive game. They dropped to the fifth place with five games lost. Pure Youth will face Taiwan Mobile (#6) in the next round. KKL will play against the league's leader Dacin Tigers.
Top scorers:
Pure Youth: Q.Davis 22+13reb+1ast, H.Chen 18+4reb+4ast, D.Creighton 14+3reb+3ast, C.Ke 12+6reb+2ast, T.Lin 6+4reb+2ast, S.Chen 4+1reb+1ast
KKL: W.Shang 24+4reb+3ast, C.Liu 19+2reb, T.Parham 17+10reb+2ast, C.Lee 8+6reb+1ast, C.Hung 5+5reb+1ast, O.Week 2+4reb+4ast
 KKL75 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 44 | AhijD, WRa-yijD | 40 | 3-2 (05%) | 3-2 (05%) | 3-0 (25%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 83 | 67 | 5 |
| 0 | vau, ChRjD | 48 | 3-65 (35%) | 4-1 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 67 | 64 | 5 |
| 98 | OiQhiB, waB | 45 | 9-68 (02.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-9 (38.7%) | 4 | 9 | 65 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 69 | 62 | 5 |
| 46 | vRR, Chuj-WRa | 81 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 5-1 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 86 | ChijD, Ya-bajD | 63 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -0 | 5 |
| 68 | HujD, Cha-ChiI | 81 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-7 (66.6%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 0 | -8 | 5 |
| 7 | ChIu, wsR-hui | 83 | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| 1 | ChRj, ChajD-WRj | 2 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -3 | 5 |
| 82 | Hsu, WR-vuj | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 36 | vI, ChRjD-Kuj | 5 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 65 | vRR, zujFa | 5 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 66 | vij, zaj-zaR | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 86-39 (33.9%) | 2-44 (83.8%) | 7-63 (13.4%) | 7 | 88 | 46 | 68 | 85 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 65 | 90 | 33 | |||
 PURE YOUTH86 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 05 | giLas, ruajZF | 41 | 65-63 (96.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 1 | 9 | 64 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 88 | 45 | 5 |
| 66 | ChRj, Hsaj-Sj | 43 | 4-1 (05%) | 4-3 (90%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 62 | 85 | 5 |
| 3 | KR, Cha-HiI | 45 | 6-3 (80%) | 4-0 (15%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 68 | 9 | 5 |
| 86 | CQRaDhUIj, gIuDlis | 81 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 2 | 5 |
| 9 | vaj, wsuj-ChajD | 86 | 8-9 (82.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 8 | 5 |
| 7 | vaj, ChajD-OijD | 60 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| 69 | ChaRj, Chai-HujD | 63 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| 63 | wsia, WRj-ChRjD | 7 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 2 | ChRj, Ahah-ChaRh | 0 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 60 | cuI, wsuj-Kia | 3 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 4 | HuijD, Cha-yRjD | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| 65 | Chu, Ya-wsujD | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 83-39 (06.6%) | 2-61 (05.5%) | 63-86 (11.9%) | 2 | 44 | 36 | 61 | 62 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 61 | 21 | 26 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
