China
Regular Season Round 28: Xinjiang FT - Shanghai S. 89-84
Date: February 1, 2012
There was a small surprise in Urumqi where tenth ranked Xinjiang Flying Tige (13-12) beat 7th ranked Shanghai Sharks (14-12) 89-84 on Wednesday. The hosts took control from the first minutes by winning first half. But Shanghai Sharks won fourth quarter 27-24. However it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. They outrebounded Shanghai Sharks 51-38 including 21 on the offensive glass. Shanghai Sharks were plagued by 28 personal fouls down the stretch. Americans were the main players on the court. Worth to mention a great performance of forward Gani Lawal (206-88, college: Georgia Tech) who helped to win the game recording a double-double by scoring 19 points and 15 rebounds and swingman Tim Pickett (193-81, college: Florida St.) who added 15 points and 12 rebounds during the contest. Four Xinjiang Flying Tige players scored in double figures. At the losing side forward Marcus Landry (201-85, college: Wisconsin) responded with a double-double by scoring 20 points and 10 rebounds and forward Mike Harris (198-83, college: Rice) scored 14 points, 6 rebounds and 4 assists. Shanghai Sharks' coach tried various players' combinations and tested in total eleven players in this game, but that didn't help. Xinjiang Flying Tige maintains tenth position with 13-12 record. Shanghai Sharks at the other side dropped to the eighth place with 12 games lost. Xinjiang Flying Tige will face higher ranked Zhejiang Guangsha Lions (#4) in Hangzhou in the next round and they do not belong to the favorites in that game.
Top scorers:
Xinjiang F.T.: L.Gani 19+15reb, C.Tal 17+2reb+2ast, P.Tim 15+12reb+1ast, M.Bateer 11+8reb+2ast, T.ZhengDong 9+5reb+1ast, P.Duo 7+3reb+1ast
Shanghai S.: L.Marcus 20+10reb+1ast, H.Mike 14+6reb+4ast, Z.ZhaoXu 10+7reb, W.Yong-Liang 9+3reb, L.Ziqui 9+2reb+1ast, T.Wen-Ting 7+4reb
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 28: Xinjiang FT - Shanghai S. 89-84
Date: February 1, 2012
There was a small surprise in Urumqi where tenth ranked Xinjiang Flying Tige (13-12) beat 7th ranked Shanghai Sharks (14-12) 89-84 on Wednesday. The hosts took control from the first minutes by winning first half. But Shanghai Sharks won fourth quarter 27-24. However it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. They outrebounded Shanghai Sharks 51-38 including 21 on the offensive glass. Shanghai Sharks were plagued by 28 personal fouls down the stretch. Americans were the main players on the court. Worth to mention a great performance of forward Gani Lawal (206-88, college: Georgia Tech) who helped to win the game recording a double-double by scoring 19 points and 15 rebounds and swingman Tim Pickett (193-81, college: Florida St.) who added 15 points and 12 rebounds during the contest. Four Xinjiang Flying Tige players scored in double figures. At the losing side forward Marcus Landry (201-85, college: Wisconsin) responded with a double-double by scoring 20 points and 10 rebounds and forward Mike Harris (198-83, college: Rice) scored 14 points, 6 rebounds and 4 assists. Shanghai Sharks' coach tried various players' combinations and tested in total eleven players in this game, but that didn't help. Xinjiang Flying Tige maintains tenth position with 13-12 record. Shanghai Sharks at the other side dropped to the eighth place with 12 games lost. Xinjiang Flying Tige will face higher ranked Zhejiang Guangsha Lions (#4) in Hangzhou in the next round and they do not belong to the favorites in that game.
Top scorers:
Xinjiang F.T.: L.Gani 19+15reb, C.Tal 17+2reb+2ast, P.Tim 15+12reb+1ast, M.Bateer 11+8reb+2ast, T.ZhengDong 9+5reb+1ast, P.Duo 7+3reb+1ast
Shanghai S.: L.Marcus 20+10reb+1ast, H.Mike 14+6reb+4ast, Z.ZhaoXu 10+7reb, W.Yong-Liang 9+3reb, L.Ziqui 9+2reb+1ast, T.Wen-Ting 7+4reb
 SHANGHAI S.84 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 38 | vijdQF, biQZus | 40 | 0-65 (05%) | 8-2 (80%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 6 | 7 | 65 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 85 | 88 | 5 |
| 2 | vau, WRa | 48 | 6-0 (85%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 5 |
| 68 | WijD, YIjD-vaijD | 46 | 4-1 (05%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| 4 | vau, caEua | 89 | 3-2 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| 84 | chijD, chiINu | 61 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 3 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 65 | 65 | 5 |
| 44 | HiQQas, baVR | 88 | 9-66 (14.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 64 | 5 |
| 3 | wsRjD, WRj-wajD | 60 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 5 |
| 85 | yRjD, waij | 60 | 6-3 (80%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 48 | za, NaijD | 60 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 0 | bRjD, vajDFuij | 60 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| 9 | ORjD, yRa | 68 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| wIUil | 87-15 (32.4%) | 0-69 (87.3%) | 66-63 (92.1%) | 66 | 89 | 42 | 61 | 82 | 85 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 60 | 23 | 91 | |||
 XINJIANG FT89 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 5 | OaZVRUU, waB | 35 | 3-2 (05%) | 6-2 (68.0%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 4 | 7 | 68 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 60 | 80 | 5 |
| 4 | ORjD, guI | 83 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-4 (5%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 5 |
| 66 | wijD, chRjDgIjD | 88 | 4-65 (45%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| 60 | Yu, ChijDdIjD | 61 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 65 | Auj, WRamI | 66 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 85 | CI, wil | 41 | 6-8 (05%) | 0-2 (18.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 69 | 62 | 5 |
| 46 | viTil, Gija | 46 | 2-66 (98.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-1 (05%) | 7 | 1 | 60 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 67 | 45 | 5 |
| 00 | Nu, GuIChIjD | 46 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 7 | bRjDVR, miURRQ | 80 | 3-66 (41.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-0 (15%) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 66 | 60 | 5 |
| wIUil | 83-08 (31.8%) | 9-83 (87.8%) | 85-87 (17.5%) | 86 | 45 | 06 | 65 | 85 | 89 | 68 | 8 | 5 | 60 | 27 | 658 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
