Sweden

Second Stage Round 4: IK Eos - Eagles 84-72

Date: February 1, 2014
There was a minor upset in Lund where 3rd ranked White Eagles (2-2) were defeated by fifth ranked IK Eos (1-4) 84-72 on Saturday. White Eagles were tied after three quarters but could not keep up in the last quarter eventually losing the game. Guard Gustav Nystrom (190-89, college: Hope) fired 29 points, 6 rebounds and 4 assists for the winners. Center David Hult (204-89) chipped in a double-double by scoring 14 points and 11 rebounds. IK Eos' coach Axel Wallin used an eleven-player rotation and allowed the starting five to rest. Forward Jon Jonsson (201-87, college: Oklah.Christian) produced 21 points and 8 rebounds and American swingman Montelle Williams (193-83) added 17 points and 9 rebounds respectively for lost side. Four White Eagles players scored in double figures. Despite that victory IK Eos went down to eighth position due to points difference, which they share with Trelleborg. Loser White Eagles dropped to the fourth place with two games lost. Both teams do not play next round, which will be an opportunity for some rest.
Top scorers:
Eagles: J.Jonsson 21+8reb+1ast, M.Williams 17+9reb+2ast, S.Guy Mbemba 15+2reb+5ast, D.Toskovic 14+3reb+1ast, D.Sosa 4+12reb+1ast, M.Trikic 1+2reb
IK Eos: G.Nystrom 29+6reb+4ast, D.Hult 14+11reb+2ast, J.Zdravevski 8+3reb+1ast, A.Karovic 7+5reb+1ast, K.Adanovur 6+8reb+3ast, E.Friman 6
gschID: 307698

  EAGLES72
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
1 WallaiBs, bIjURllR 35 8-8 (655%) 4-3 (90%) 3-3 (655%) 4 1 7 8 5 5 6 5 5 6 69 89 5
65 zIjssIj, zIj 41 8-9 (82.1%) 3-9 (09.6%) 0-7 (00.1%) 4 0 2 6 5 5 6 6 5 3 86 61 5
64 wIsVILaZ, gijalI 43 1-65 (15%) 5-6 (5%) 8-0 (35%) 8 6 4 6 4 5 5 6 5 8 63 1 5
68 bMRBMi, AhiTj GuF 45 0-68 (36.9%) 6-65 (65%) 8-0 (35%) 5 8 8 0 3 5 8 5 5 1 60 -0 5
63 AIsi, gnIQdR 81 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8 65 68 6 4 5 6 6 5 4 3 65 5
2 banijILaZ, SjdQani 63 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 5 6 5 6 6 5 5 5 4 5
60 wQaVaZ, balIs 65 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 8 8 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 6 -8 5
9 miUsIs, qpiBRajIjdis 0 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -6 5
wIUil   69-49 (31.5%) 2-88 (41.3%) 63-80 (01.5%) 65 87 47 65 61 5 1 3 5 61 98 03  


  IK EOS84
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
7 KiQILaZ, Sdjij 81 6-2 (68.0%) 6-8 (05%) 8-8 (655%) 8 4 0 6 6 5 6 5 5 6 9 3 5
60 HulU, giLad 83 0-66 (30.0%) 5-6 (5%) 3-0 (25%) 3 9 66 8 3 5 6 4 5 5 63 67 5
1 HRjQaVs, ChQasUIffRQ 88 6-0 (85%) 5-8 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 8 0 9 6 3 5 4 5 5 4 3 8 5
68 mRjdJ, wiajI 66 5-6 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 6 5 6 5 5 6 5 -8 5
9 viaVR, GusUif 2 5-6 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 -6 5
64 XFsUQIB, GusUiL 89 2-60 (04.4%) 3-1 (11.9%) 6-8 (05%) 6 0 1 3 6 5 8 6 5 6 87 45 5
63 SdijILuQ, KIfa 67 4-3 (90%) 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 4 0 2 4 3 5 6 5 5 5 1 68 5
3 GnIQup, Xals 62 6-8 (05%) 6-8 (05%) 6-8 (05%) 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 4 1 -8 5
65 cdQiLRLsVa, zILij 63 4-3 (90%) 5-4 (5%) 8-4 (11.9%) 6 8 4 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 2 0 5
2 yQaBij, qQaV 63 6-8 (05%) 6-4 (44.4%) 6-8 (05%) 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 5
66 bRdnRdIuM, SMdIu 66 8-3 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 3 6 5
0 bIUFVi, gijaRl  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   80-09 (34.7%) 9-88 (46.2%) 64-67 (12.3%) 61 82 33 68 88 5 65 3 5 66 23 12  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)