Estonia
Regular Season Round 23: Tarvas - KK Hito 110-79
Date: March 7, 2014
The game with biggest result difference took place in Rakvere. Local BC Rakvere (19-6) outscored 9th ranked KK Hito (1-26) 110-79 on Friday night. The game was mostly controlled by BC Rakvere. KK Hito was better in third quarter 28-24. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. BC Rakvere forced 21 KK Hito turnovers. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 22 assists. KK Hito was plagued by 27 personal fouls down the stretch. The best player for the winners was Latvian forward Maris Laksa (207-81, college: Providence) who scored 24 points and 6 rebounds. Guard Mihkel Kurg (190-87) chipped in 21 points. Forward Janek Veedla (192-88) produced 20 points and 6 rebounds and point guard Siim Laur (189-87) added 11 points and 7 assists respectively for the guests. Five BC Rakvere and four KK Hito players scored in double figures. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. BC Rakvere have an impressive series of seven victories in a row. They maintain third place with 19-6 record having just one point less than leader TU/Rock. KK Hito lost twentieth fourth consecutive game. They stay dead last with 26 lost games. BC Rakvere will face Valga (#8) at home in the next round which should be theoretically another easy game. KK Hito will play against Rapla and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
Top scorers:
Tarvas: M.Laksa 24+6reb+3ast, M.Kurg 21+2reb+3ast, J.Umbrasko 14+5reb+3ast, K.Saage 13+2reb+3ast, S.Saare 11+2reb, G.Gustas 10+3reb+5ast
KK Hito: J.Veedla 20+6reb+1ast, J.Prophet 13+2reb+2ast, S.Laur 11+2reb+7ast, E.Trumm 10+6reb+1ast, S.Post 8+1ast, A.Lehismets 6+1reb
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 23: Tarvas - KK Hito 110-79
Date: March 7, 2014
The game with biggest result difference took place in Rakvere. Local BC Rakvere (19-6) outscored 9th ranked KK Hito (1-26) 110-79 on Friday night. The game was mostly controlled by BC Rakvere. KK Hito was better in third quarter 28-24. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. BC Rakvere forced 21 KK Hito turnovers. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 22 assists. KK Hito was plagued by 27 personal fouls down the stretch. The best player for the winners was Latvian forward Maris Laksa (207-81, college: Providence) who scored 24 points and 6 rebounds. Guard Mihkel Kurg (190-87) chipped in 21 points. Forward Janek Veedla (192-88) produced 20 points and 6 rebounds and point guard Siim Laur (189-87) added 11 points and 7 assists respectively for the guests. Five BC Rakvere and four KK Hito players scored in double figures. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. BC Rakvere have an impressive series of seven victories in a row. They maintain third place with 19-6 record having just one point less than leader TU/Rock. KK Hito lost twentieth fourth consecutive game. They stay dead last with 26 lost games. BC Rakvere will face Valga (#8) at home in the next round which should be theoretically another easy game. KK Hito will play against Rapla and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
Top scorers:
Tarvas: M.Laksa 24+6reb+3ast, M.Kurg 21+2reb+3ast, J.Umbrasko 14+5reb+3ast, K.Saage 13+2reb+3ast, S.Saare 11+2reb, G.Gustas 10+3reb+5ast
KK Hito: J.Veedla 20+6reb+1ast, J.Prophet 13+2reb+2ast, S.Laur 11+2reb+7ast, E.Trumm 10+6reb+1ast, S.Post 8+1ast, A.Lehismets 6+1reb
 KK HITO79 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 1 | viuQ, AaaB | 44 | 3-2 (05%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 66 | 7 | 5 |
| 60 | kRRdli, zijRV | 48 | 4-1 (05%) | 4-3 (90%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 85 | 67 | 5 |
| 3 | OQIphRU, zIR | 82 | 1-68 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 64 | 8 | 5 |
| 86 | tuRVuli, wIjas | 69 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | -6 | 5 |
| 85 | AiiQ, zilBiQ-zIIsRp | 68 | 5-8 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | -6 | 5 |
| 0 | OIsU, AaaB-biQVus | 85 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6-3 (80%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | -0 | 5 |
| 66 | wQuBB, qdLiQd | 62 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6-6 (655%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 65 | 68 | 5 |
| 68 | viijRBRUs, biQVus | 66 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | KIIl, ziQVI | 65 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 63 | vRhasBRUs, SjdQus | 2 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| 7 | eIIsaBiDa, tQBRU | 1 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 48 | KaQsaBii, biQaI | 0 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| wIUil | 85-38 (39.1%) | 9-85 (40.5%) | 62-84 (92.4%) | 3 | 85 | 83 | 64 | 89 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 86 | 97 | 41 | |||
 TARVAS110 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 7 | viVsi, biQas | 83 | 9-65 (95%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 3-2 (05%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 83 | 83 | 5 |
| 86 | tBMQisVI, zuQas | 83 | 1-2 (90%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 67 | 5 |
| 44 | AiiDR, KQasUI | 83 | 8-8 (655%) | 8-2 (80%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 64 | 9 | 5 |
| 60 | GusUis, GaRdQaus | 83 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-6 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 65 | 63 | 5 |
| 46 | vRppaV, AalLRQ | 86 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| 2 | KuQD, bahVRl | 83 | 4-3 (90%) | 0-7 (00.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 86 | 67 | 5 |
| 9 | AiiQR, AijdRQ | 85 | 8-8 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 9 | 5 |
| 68 | wQaMujUsIL, eiaBIjd | 66 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 |
| 64 | bRUsiQu, SjdQa | 65 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| 48 | AhuBijIL, bidas | 2 | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 5 |
| 3 | HujU, biUUais | 9 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 63 | kRRLI, wiiLa | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 82-35 (95.5%) | 66-87 (49.7%) | 86-87 (98.3%) | 9 | 81 | 44 | 88 | 83 | 5 | 68 | 4 | 5 | 64 | 665 | 650 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
