Poland
Regular Season Round 8: Sokol Lancut - AZS AWF Mick. 100-49
Date: November 7, 2015
The game with biggest result difference took place in Lancut. Local Sokol Lancut (6-2) outscored 16th ranked AZS AWF Mick. (1-7) 100-49. Sokol Lancut dominated down low during the game scoring 60 of its points in the paint compared to AZS AWF Mick.'s 32 and made 22-of-25 charity shots (88.0 percent) during the game. They outrebounded AZS AWF Mick. 50-31 including a 38-24 advantage in defensive rebounds. Sokol Lancut players were unselfish on offense dishing 27 assists comparing to just 11 passes made by AZS AWF Mick.'s players. 25 personal fouls committed by AZS AWF Mick. helped opponents get some easy free throw opportunities. The winners were led by power forward Tomasz Pisarczyk (202-85) who had that evening a double-double by scoring 19 points and 12 rebounds and swingman Jerzy Koszuta (192-82, agency: Promotex) supported him with 14 points and 5 rebounds. Four Sokol Lancut players scored in double figures. Even 4 points, 5 rebounds and 5 assists by guard Lukasz Szczypka (185-80) did not help to save the game for AZS AWF Mick.. Guard Karol Leszczynski (190-87) added 7 points for the guests. Since the result was very predictable, it gave the chance for the coaches to test many bench players and allowed the starting five to rest. Sokol Lancut maintains third position with 6-2 record having just two points less than leader Krosno. AZS AWF Mick. lost sixth consecutive game. Newly promoted team stay at the bottom place with seven games lost. Sokol Lancut's next round opponent will be GKS Tychy (#6) on the road. AZS AWF Mick. will play against Notec Inowr. (#13) and hope to win that game.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 8: Sokol Lancut - AZS AWF Mick. 100-49
Date: November 7, 2015
The game with biggest result difference took place in Lancut. Local Sokol Lancut (6-2) outscored 16th ranked AZS AWF Mick. (1-7) 100-49. Sokol Lancut dominated down low during the game scoring 60 of its points in the paint compared to AZS AWF Mick.'s 32 and made 22-of-25 charity shots (88.0 percent) during the game. They outrebounded AZS AWF Mick. 50-31 including a 38-24 advantage in defensive rebounds. Sokol Lancut players were unselfish on offense dishing 27 assists comparing to just 11 passes made by AZS AWF Mick.'s players. 25 personal fouls committed by AZS AWF Mick. helped opponents get some easy free throw opportunities. The winners were led by power forward Tomasz Pisarczyk (202-85) who had that evening a double-double by scoring 19 points and 12 rebounds and swingman Jerzy Koszuta (192-82, agency: Promotex) supported him with 14 points and 5 rebounds. Four Sokol Lancut players scored in double figures. Even 4 points, 5 rebounds and 5 assists by guard Lukasz Szczypka (185-80) did not help to save the game for AZS AWF Mick.. Guard Karol Leszczynski (190-87) added 7 points for the guests. Since the result was very predictable, it gave the chance for the coaches to test many bench players and allowed the starting five to rest. Sokol Lancut maintains third position with 6-2 record having just two points less than leader Krosno. AZS AWF Mick. lost sixth consecutive game. Newly promoted team stay at the bottom place with seven games lost. Sokol Lancut's next round opponent will be GKS Tychy (#6) on the road. AZS AWF Mick. will play against Notec Inowr. (#13) and hope to win that game.
 AZS AWF MICK. (coach: Lukasz Szczypka)49 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 68 | vRsJZJFjsVa, KiQIl | 89 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-9 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 5 |
| 9 | AJZJFpVi, vuVisJ | 89 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 66 | OaIUQVITsVa, biQausJ | 84 | 8-9 (82.1%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| 63 | KuQduMsVa, KQJFsJUIf | 85 | 4-1 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-2 (49.0%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| 1 | GIspIdiQRV, OiUQFV | 85 | 6-3 (80%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| 64 | KIJiV, baZhil | 67 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 9 | 5 |
| 60 | XITiV, KiBal | 63 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | baDili, biURusJ | 64 | 6-2 (68.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-1 (05%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | -3 | 5 |
| 3 | GQJRDIQJRTsVa, vuVisJ | 68 | 5-8 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | -8 | 5 |
| 0 | KIlRjdi, ziQIsliT | 68 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 65 | XITRQsVa, OiUQFV | 2 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -1 | 5 |
| wIUil | 61-37 (48.9%) | 4-69 (69.9%) | 2-62 (33.3%) | 9 | 83 | 46 | 66 | 80 | 62 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64 | 37 | 61 | |||
 SOKOL LANCUT (coach: Dariusz Kaszowski)100 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 60 | KlaBi, biZaRn | 83 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-4 (655%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 67 | 5 |
| 85 | ziVIMZJFV, KQJFsJUIf | 84 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 5 |
| 65 | KIsJuUi, zRQJF | 67 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 85 | 5 |
| 1 | KulaVITsVa, eifil | 67 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 5-6 (5%) | 3-0 (25%) | 4 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 68 | 67 | 5 |
| 3 | yIQUuji, wIBisJ | 62 | 6-6 (655%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 66 | 62 | 5 |
| 0 | OliTuZVa, biQZaj | 62 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 66 | 63 | 5 |
| 61 | CJRQTIjVi, miQUIsJ | 69 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 45 | OasiQZJFV, wIBisJ | 61 | 4-0 (15%) | 6-3 (80%) | 65-66 (75.7%) | 3 | 2 | 68 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 67 | 44 | 5 |
| 69 | WQIji, OQJRBFsliT | 61 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 6 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 2 | miliTRjdRQ, ziZRV | 68 | 4-4 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 9 | 5 |
| 83 | musJUi, OiUQFV | 9 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | -8 | 5 |
| 9 | ojDlIU, SdQaij | 3 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 45-37 (16.8%) | 1-86 (82.1%) | 88-80 (22.5%) | 68 | 42 | 05 | 89 | 62 | 80 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 66 | 655 | 632 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
