Poland
Regular Season Round 23: Legia W-wa - Notec Inowr. 116-68
Date: February 13, 2016
The game with biggest result difference took place in Warszawa. Local Legia W-wa (16-7) outscored 8th ranked Notec Inowr. (9-14) 116-68. Legia W-wa dominated down low during the game scoring 60 of its points in the paint compared to Notec Inowr.'s 30. Legia W-wa forced 24 Notec Inowr. turnovers. Their players were unselfish on offense dishing 28 assists comparing to just 14 passes made by Notec Inowr.'s players. Notec Inowr. was plagued by 24 personal fouls down the stretch. Michal Aleksandrowicz (192-89) orchestrated the victory by scoring 20 points and 5 rebounds (on 7-of-9 shooting from the field). The former international swingman Grzegorz Kukielka (191-83) contributed with 19 points (on 8-of-10 shooting from the field) for the winners. Four Legia W-wa players scored in double figures. Legia W-wa's coach Piotr Bakun felt very confident that he used 10 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Dawid Adamczewski (190-91) answered with 11 points and 5 rebounds and point guard Kamil Maciejewski (188-91) added 5 points, 8 rebounds and 4 assists in the effort for Notec Inowr.Legia W-wa maintains third place with 16-7 record having six points less than leader Krosno. Newly promoted Notec Inowr. dropped to the ninth position with 14 games lost. They share it with 3 other teams. Legia W-wa will play against bottom-ranked GTK Gliwice (#16) at home in the next round which should be another easy win for them. Notec Inowr. will play against AZS AWF Mick. (#15) and hopes to get back on the winning track.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 23: Legia W-wa - Notec Inowr. 116-68
Date: February 13, 2016
The game with biggest result difference took place in Warszawa. Local Legia W-wa (16-7) outscored 8th ranked Notec Inowr. (9-14) 116-68. Legia W-wa dominated down low during the game scoring 60 of its points in the paint compared to Notec Inowr.'s 30. Legia W-wa forced 24 Notec Inowr. turnovers. Their players were unselfish on offense dishing 28 assists comparing to just 14 passes made by Notec Inowr.'s players. Notec Inowr. was plagued by 24 personal fouls down the stretch. Michal Aleksandrowicz (192-89) orchestrated the victory by scoring 20 points and 5 rebounds (on 7-of-9 shooting from the field). The former international swingman Grzegorz Kukielka (191-83) contributed with 19 points (on 8-of-10 shooting from the field) for the winners. Four Legia W-wa players scored in double figures. Legia W-wa's coach Piotr Bakun felt very confident that he used 10 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Dawid Adamczewski (190-91) answered with 11 points and 5 rebounds and point guard Kamil Maciejewski (188-91) added 5 points, 8 rebounds and 4 assists in the effort for Notec Inowr.Legia W-wa maintains third place with 16-7 record having six points less than leader Krosno. Newly promoted Notec Inowr. dropped to the ninth position with 14 games lost. They share it with 3 other teams. Legia W-wa will play against bottom-ranked GTK Gliwice (#16) at home in the next round which should be another easy win for them. Notec Inowr. will play against AZS AWF Mick. (#15) and hopes to get back on the winning track.
 LEGIA W-WA (coach: Heiko Rannula)116 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 45 | SjdQJRnRTsVa, wIBisJ | 82 | 0-7 (00.1%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 3 | 1 | 65 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 69 | 5 |
| 0 | SlRVsijdQITaZJ, baZhil | 89 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 8-8 (655%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 85 | 81 | 5 |
| 44 | KuVaRlVi, GQJRDIQJ | 88 | 0-1 (24.4%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 67 | 80 | 5 |
| 33 | OiQJFZh, SdiB | 88 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 8-3 (05%) | 4-4 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 64 | 67 | 5 |
| 2 | bilRTsVa, GQJRDIQJ | 85 | 4-3 (90%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 60 | 64 | 5 |
| 80 | vajITsVa, SdiB | 85 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 60 | 5 |
| 66 | WalZJRV, vuVisJ | 67 | 4-0 (15%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 61 | 5 |
| 86 | OisJVaRTaZJ, SjdQJRn | 60 | 8-8 (655%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 63 | PQjIZh, miQUlIBaRn | 68 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| 69 | WalZJRV, biQZRl | 65 | 4-1 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 64 | 7 | 5 |
| wIUil | 45-30 (11.9%) | 64-89 (32.8%) | 69-83 (95.2%) | 68 | 89 | 47 | 82 | 80 | 83 | 64 | 6 | 4 | 66 | 661 | 631 | |||
 NOTEC INOWR. (coach: Krzysztof Szubarga)68 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 63 | AQIZJFjsVa, ARTRQFj | 87 | 3-0 (25%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 65 | 2 | 5 |
| 85 | biZaRnRTsVa, KiBal | 89 | 8-7 (88.8%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 1 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 3 | baZhilRV, KiQIl | 81 | 8-9 (82.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 9-2 (29.0%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 66 | 5 |
| 76 | SdiBZJRTsVa, giTad | 81 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 66 | 68 | 5 |
| 0 | WaRQJMaZVa, HuMRQU | 86 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | KIJlITsVa, KQJFsJUIf | 85 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-3 (80%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| 78 | gusalI, ARMisUaij | 67 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-6 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 5 |
| 66 | yalapaiV, SlRVsijdRQ | 60 | 5-3 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| 09 | eiUinZJiV, vuVisJ | 64 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 5 |
| wIUil | 60-42 (47.0%) | 1-67 (46.1%) | 85-45 (11.9%) | 64 | 62 | 46 | 63 | 83 | 80 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 83 | 12 | 08 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
