Poland
Regular Season Round 22: Olesnica - AZS PP 74-77
Date: March 6, 2016
Everything could happen at the game between two tied teams. Both ninth ranked AZS PP and 8th ranked Olesnica had identical 7-14 record. But Olesnica was not able to use a home court advantage and was edged by the opponent from Poznan 77-74 on Sunday night. AZS PP made 27-of-29 free shots (93.1 percent) during the game. Olesnica was plagued by 26 personal fouls down the stretch. Center Szymon Budnikowski (200-84) fired a double-double by scoring 19 points and 11 rebounds for the winners. Albert Krawiec (188-94) chipped in 15 points and 7 rebounds. Four AZS PP players scored in double figures. Swingman Grzegorz Kaczmarek (193-83) produced 31 points and 7 rebounds and center Wojciech Suprun (203-82) added 10 points and 5 assists respectively for lost side. Both coaches used bench players in such tough game. AZS PP (8-14) moved-up to eighth place, which they share with 3 other teams. Newly promoted Olesnica keeps the eighth position with 15 games lost.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 22: Olesnica - AZS PP 74-77
Date: March 6, 2016
Everything could happen at the game between two tied teams. Both ninth ranked AZS PP and 8th ranked Olesnica had identical 7-14 record. But Olesnica was not able to use a home court advantage and was edged by the opponent from Poznan 77-74 on Sunday night. AZS PP made 27-of-29 free shots (93.1 percent) during the game. Olesnica was plagued by 26 personal fouls down the stretch. Center Szymon Budnikowski (200-84) fired a double-double by scoring 19 points and 11 rebounds for the winners. Albert Krawiec (188-94) chipped in 15 points and 7 rebounds. Four AZS PP players scored in double figures. Swingman Grzegorz Kaczmarek (193-83) produced 31 points and 7 rebounds and center Wojciech Suprun (203-82) added 10 points and 5 assists respectively for lost side. Both coaches used bench players in such tough game. AZS PP (8-14) moved-up to eighth place, which they share with 3 other teams. Newly promoted Olesnica keeps the eighth position with 15 games lost.
 AZS PP77 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 2 | euUVITsVa, biURusJ | 41 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4-4 (655%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 66 | 5 |
| 76 | mudjaVITsVa, AJFBIj | 44 | 9-65 (95%) | 5-5 (5%) | 0-0 (655%) | 9 | 3 | 66 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 67 | 45 | 5 |
| 84 | OiTRlZJFV, WInZaRZh | 87 | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-0 (25%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 65 | 66 | 5 |
| 64 | WaRlRZhITsVa, baZhil | 80 | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-8 (5%) | 1-9 (20.9%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 68 | 2 | 5 |
| 9 | KQiTaRZ, SlMRQU | 86 | 0-65 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 60 | 63 | 5 |
| 7 | KQJRBaRj, SdiB | 86 | 5-8 (5%) | 6-0 (85%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 5 |
| 65 | AJZJRpijsVa, ziVuM | 69 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-4 (655%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 65 | 5 |
| 85 | ApIndi, OiUQFV | 1 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | -0 | 5 |
| 61 | balRn, Plif | 0 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 0 | AIMZJiV, KIjQid | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| wIUil | 88-31 (39.2%) | 8-64 (60.3%) | 89-87 (74.6%) | 66 | 88 | 44 | 68 | 61 | 81 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 62 | 99 | 25 | |||
 OLESNICA (coach: Marcin Stach)74 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 86 | KiZJBiQRV, GQJRDIQJ | 48 | 66-62 (16.6%) | 8-0 (35%) | 4-4 (655%) | 0 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 46 | 46 | 5 |
| 68 | AupQuj, WInZaRZh | 45 | 3-3 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 62 | 5 |
| 4 | KQuV, GQJRDIQJ | 87 | 8-3 (05%) | 5-0 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 65 | 5 |
| 1 | biliVhiu, vuVi | 82 | 8-8 (655%) | 8-65 (85%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 2 | 5 |
| 66 | KuUi, KiZpRQ | 81 | 4-2 (49.0%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 1 | -8 | 5 |
| 3 | AUiZh, biQZaj | 60 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 4-0 (15%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 7 | OaisRZVa, giTad | 64 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | -3 | 5 |
| 2 | Kalaij, ziVuM | 65 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 60 | ziQBiVITaZJ, biZaRn | 2 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 0 | cuMRQ, SdQaij | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| 39 | ciVQJRTsVa, KinRUij | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 64 | KuZhiQsVa, AJFBIj | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 84-42 (15.0%) | 0-46 (61.6%) | 64-67 (12.3%) | 66 | 61 | 89 | 61 | 81 | 61 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 65 | 93 | 16 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
