Poland
Regular Season Round 30: Notec Inowr. - Sokol Lancut 56-70
Date: April 3, 2016
Very expected game when 12th ranked Notec Inowr. (10-20) lost to second ranked Sokol Lancut (25-5) in Inowroclaw 56-70 on Sunday. Sokol Lancut forced 19 Notec Inowr. turnovers. It was a good game for guard Krzysztof Jakobczyk (183-86, agency: Promotex) who led his team to a victory with 17 points. Power forward Tomasz Pisarczyk (202-85) contributed with 15 points and 7 rebounds for the winners. Dawid Adamczewski (190-91) replied with 12 points and 5 rebounds and center Karol Michalek (208-87, agency: Promotex) added 11 points and 5 rebounds in the effort for Notec Inowr.Four Notec Inowr. players scored in double figures. Both coaches used bench players saving starting five for next games. Sokol Lancut have a solid three-game winning streak. They maintain second position with 25-5 record having four points less than leader Krosno. Notec Inowr. lost sixth consecutive game. Newly promoted team keeps the twelfth place with 20 games lost.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 30: Notec Inowr. - Sokol Lancut 56-70
Date: April 3, 2016
Very expected game when 12th ranked Notec Inowr. (10-20) lost to second ranked Sokol Lancut (25-5) in Inowroclaw 56-70 on Sunday. Sokol Lancut forced 19 Notec Inowr. turnovers. It was a good game for guard Krzysztof Jakobczyk (183-86, agency: Promotex) who led his team to a victory with 17 points. Power forward Tomasz Pisarczyk (202-85) contributed with 15 points and 7 rebounds for the winners. Dawid Adamczewski (190-91) replied with 12 points and 5 rebounds and center Karol Michalek (208-87, agency: Promotex) added 11 points and 5 rebounds in the effort for Notec Inowr.Four Notec Inowr. players scored in double figures. Both coaches used bench players saving starting five for next games. Sokol Lancut have a solid three-game winning streak. They maintain second position with 25-5 record having four points less than leader Krosno. Notec Inowr. lost sixth consecutive game. Newly promoted team keeps the twelfth place with 20 games lost.
 NOTEC INOWR. (coach: Krzysztof Szubarga)56 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 76 | SdiBZJRTsVa, giTad | 87 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 8-9 (82.1%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 68 | 2 | 5 |
| 63 | AQIZJFjsVa, ARTRQFj | 81 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-6 (5%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 66 | 66 | 5 |
| 3 | baZhilRV, KiQIl | 83 | 0-65 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 4 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 66 | 66 | 5 |
| 66 | yalapaiV, SlRVsijdRQ | 83 | 4-4 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 65 | 68 | 5 |
| 0 | WaRQJMaZVa, HuMRQU | 83 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 09 | eiUinZJiV, vuVisJ | 69 | 5-0 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 9 | OIZhIZVa, miQUIsJ | 60 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| 85 | biZaRnRTsVa, KiBal | 60 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| 78 | gusalI, ARMisUaij | 64 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 2 | KIJlITsVa, KQJFsJUIf | 7 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| wIUil | 61-35 (35.5%) | 8-60 (64.4%) | 62-83 (90.5%) | 68 | 86 | 44 | 66 | 88 | 84 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 67 | 01 | 32 | |||
 SOKOL LANCUT (coach: Dariusz Kaszowski)70 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 45 | OasiQZJFV, wIBisJ | 43 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 6-8 (05%) | 3-3 (655%) | 6 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 60 | 85 | 5 |
| 85 | ziVIMZJFV, KQJFsJUIf | 83 | 4-0 (15%) | 4-1 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 69 | 7 | 5 |
| 68 | bQIZJRV-wQusVITsVa, SdQaij | 83 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 65 | KIsJuUi, zRQJF | 86 | 8-3 (05%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 5 |
| 1 | KulaVITsVa, eifil | 85 | 8-9 (82.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 66 | 5 |
| 69 | WQIji, OQJRBFsliT | 67 | 4-3 (90%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 63 | 5 |
| 3 | yIQUuji, wIBisJ | 69 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| 61 | CJRQTIjVi, miQUIsJ | 69 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| 2 | miliTRjdRQ, ziZRV | 61 | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 5 |
| 60 | KlaBi, biZaRn | 3 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| wIUil | 63-45 (31.9%) | 7-83 (49.0%) | 60-62 (24.4%) | 9 | 83 | 46 | 60 | 84 | 88 | 65 | 5 | 8 | 60 | 95 | 93 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
