Australia

Regular Season Round 5: Rockingham F. - Lakeside L. 113-85

Date: April 9, 2016
There was no surprise in Rockingham where 8th ranked Lightning (2-3) was outplayed by fourth ranked Flames (4-2) 113-85 on Saturday. Flames outrebounded Lightning 57-41 including a 38-24 advantage in defensive rebounds. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 28 assists comparing to just 11 passes made by Lightning's players. Great defensive blocking was one of the keys in this match when Flames made 8 blocks. American power forward Cooper Land (205-88, college: Wright St.) stepped up with a double-double by scoring 30 points, 14 rebounds and 4 assists for the winners and power forward Chudier Pal (205-91, college: NC-Asheville) chipped in 27 points, 16 rebounds and 6 blocks. Four Flames players scored in double figures. American forward T.J. Hallice (206-92, college: Mercer) responded with 20 points and 8 rebounds and guard Seva Chan (187-94) scored 20 points and 4 assists. Since the result was very predictable, it gave the chance for the coaches to test many bench players and allowed the starting five to rest. Flames moved-up to third place in League. Loser Lightning dropped to the tenth position with three games lost. Flames will face Buccaneers (#9) in Wonthella in the next round which should be theoretically another easy game. Lightning will play at home against Eagles and it may be a tough game between close rivals.

  LAKESIDE L.85
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
80 HillaZR, w.z. 35 0-60 (44.4%) 8-3 (05%) 3-2 (05%) 8 1 2 5 0 2 6 5 5 3 85 68 5
3 Chij, ARLi 82 9-2 (29.0%) 8-3 (05%) 5-4 (5%) 5 8 8 3 0 8 5 5 5 5 85 69 5
63 GQadi, g 81 8-2 (80%) 5-6 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 0 6 1 6 6 1 6 5 3 8 0 3 5
86 SlRxijdRQ, gijaRl 84 9-65 (95%) 5-5 (5%) 8-4 (11.9%) 8 4 0 6 8 0 5 6 5 4 61 67 5
2 mRll, HiFdRj 86 8-4 (11.9%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 9 1 5
60 AhRQLall, C 85 6-3 (80%) 6-4 (44.4%) 6-8 (05%) 8 4 0 5 6 0 6 6 6 5 1 65 5
7 biQUaj, CIQRF 85 6-0 (85%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 5 5 3 5 5 5 6 8 4 5
9 kajZa, biUUhRT 60 6-1 (61.9%) 5-6 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 5 5 8 6 5 6 5 5 8 4 -3 5
85 OiQVajsIj, wIB 60 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6-3 (80%) 6 4 3 5 8 3 5 5 5 8 6 6 5
64 ApiUZhRQ, z 65 6-8 (05%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 8 6 4 6 5 4 5 5 6 5 0 65 5
0 OillRsZha, XaZhIlis 65 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 6 5 8 5 6 5 6 5 0 5
1 biVuRa, guV 1 5-4 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 6 6 5 5 5 6 5 -3 5
wIUil   89-10 (36.0%) 9-85 (40.5%) 65-83 (36.9%) 69 83 36 66 67 36 3 4 1 61 20 97  


  ROCKINGHAM F.113
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
2 GIdfQRF, eFij 42 3-1 (11.9%) 8-9 (82.1%) 8-4 (11.9%) 6 4 3 3 3 3 6 5 5 6 61 61 5
63 vijd, CIIpRQ 45 9-68 (02.4%) 3-68 (44.4%) 3-3 (655%) 4 66 63 3 3 63 6 6 6 5 45 31 5
80 Oil, ChudaRQ 45 68-67 (14.8%) 5-5 (5%) 4-4 (655%) 9 7 61 6 4 61 6 1 5 4 89 03 5
1 eIMRQUs, vuVR 45 6-8 (05%) 5-8 (5%) 6-3 (80%) 4 5 4 3 8 4 4 5 5 0 4 4 5
7 vijd, wiFlIQ 87 3-65 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 5-3 (5%) 6 8 4 9 4 4 6 5 6 6 2 9 5
0 HIjRF, biUUhRT 83 5-6 (5%) 3-2 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 4 0 2 3 5 2 5 5 5 6 68 81 5
68 yQijaZh, XRMInshi 88 6-8 (05%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 8 5 3 6 5 5 6 8 7 5
65 mRiQd, zusUaj 63 8-4 (11.9%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 6 5 8 5 5 5 6 9 65 5
64 zRffQRF, eFij 9 5-5 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 0 5
9 AiBuRlsIj, giaj 0 5-6 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5-8 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 6 6 4 -4 5
60 mRiQd, KFlR 0 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 6 5 8 5 6 5 6 8 9 5
66 GQaffaj, ziQQFd 6 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
wIUil   48-09 (01.6%) 64-43 (42.8%) 65-85 (05.5%) 67 42 09 82 69 09 2 2 4 60 664 625  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)