Ukraine

Semi-Finals Game 1: Khimik - Cherkasy 86-75

Date: April 14, 2016
Khimik topped Cherkasy to take 1-0 lead in the series. The game was mostly controlled by Khimik. Cherkasy was better in second period 20-16. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. Khimik dominated down low during the game scoring 54 of its points in the paint compared to Cherkasy's 22. Their players were unselfish on offense dishing 21 assists. Viacheslav Petrov (203-94) nailed a double-double by scoring 18 points, 10 rebounds and 4 assists for the winning side and American power forward Matthew Shaw (203-88, college: UNLV) accounted for 16 points and 5 rebounds (on 7-of-9 shooting from the field). Khimik's coach Oleg Yushkin allowed to play the deep bench players saving starting five for next games. Oleksandr Kobets (194-96) came up with 20 points and naturalized Moldovan center Stanislav Zavadsky (213-87) added 19 points respectively for Cherkasy in the defeat. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures.

  CHERKASY (coach: Dmytro Nagornyi)75
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
7 AaJIL, SlRxijdRQ 41 6-8 (05%) 8-9 (82.1%) 8-8 (655%) 5 0 0 0 4 5 8 5 5 6 65 68 5
66 ciLidsVF, AUijasliL 89 0-2 (18.0%) 6-6 (655%) 1-9 (20.9%) 6 4 3 5 6 5 5 6 5 6 67 62 5
3 SQUiBIjIL, KlFB 89 5-8 (5%) 3-2 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 0 3 5 8 5 5 6 68 7 5
68 XIsVIL, gRjas 83 6-8 (05%) 8-1 (44.4%) 6-8 (05%) 6 0 1 8 3 5 5 5 5 6 7 1 5
45 SjUIjRUs, gBaUQI 2 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 6 6 5 5 5 5 8 5 -6 5
86 KIMRUs, PlRVsijdQ 46 4-4 (655%) 3-9 (09.6%) 8-8 (655%) 6 4 3 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 85 67 5
9 AhiliBIL, SjdQaa 61 6-1 (61.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 5 8 5 5 5 5 6 8 -4 5
1 Hill, viQQF 63 5-6 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 4-3 (90%) 6 5 6 8 6 5 5 5 5 8 4 5 5
84 giLFdauV, SjUIj 66 5-5 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5
60 baQIshjFZhRjVI, biVsFB  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
63 AVipajUsRL, gBFUQI  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
64 miliMij, YRLDRj  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   66-83 (30.2%) 64-44 (47.3%) 63-69 (28.3%) 0 83 87 60 62 5 3 6 5 7 90 16  


  KHIMIK86
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
83 KIjRL, klidaBaQ 46 3-2 (05%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 3 0 3 8 5 6 5 5 8 2 7 5
66 yQiJaRQ, mQijdRj 81 4-0 (15%) 6-0 (85%) 8-4 (11.9%) 6 5 6 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 66 9 5
2 AhiT, biUUhRT 88 9-9 (655%) 5-8 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 8 4 0 6 3 5 6 5 5 6 61 61 5
38 SjUFpIL, PlRVsijdQ 61 6-8 (05%) 5-6 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5 4 4 5 4 5 6 5 5 5 8 5 5
64 mRlaVIL, PlRxijdQ 68 6-6 (655%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 8 5 5
88 ORUQIL, kaiZhRsliL 84 9-65 (95%) 6-6 (655%) 6-8 (05%) 4 9 65 3 8 5 5 6 5 8 62 80 5
67 eFiMZhuV, PlRVsijdQ 88 5-4 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 6 0 1 8 4 5 8 5 5 5 4 1 5
4 bilZhRLsVaF, kaUila 69 6-6 (655%) 6-1 (61.9%) 1-1 (655%) 5 6 6 6 8 5 5 6 5 5 66 9 5
00 AadIQIL, ollFi 69 8-0 (35%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 0 4 5 5 5 5 5 65 66 5
86 OQIVIpRjVI, PlRVsijdQ 1 6-8 (05%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 1 5
3 OIpIL, ARQDRa 8 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
84 OiLlIL, ARQDaF  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   89-33 (16.3%) 9-83 (87.8%) 66-63 (92.1%) 65 89 49 86 85 5 0 8 5 9 21 29  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)