Ukraine

Semi-Finals Game 2: Khimik - Cherkasy 87-72

Date: April 15, 2016
Khimik prevailed against Cherkasy at home court to secure 2-0 lead in the series. It looked good early as Cherkasy took a 3-point small lead at the end of first quarter. But then Khimik had a 28-13 second period charge getting the lead and Cherkasy was not able to take back game control losing it eventually 72-87. Khimik made 23-of-28 charity shots (82.1 percent) during the game. They outrebounded Cherkasy 41-28 including 27 on the defensive glass. Cherkasy was plagued by 28 personal fouls down the stretch. American point guard Branden Frazier (190-92, college: Fordham) notched 15 points and 7 assists to lead the effort and Viacheslav Petrov (203-94) supported him with 12 points and 8 rebounds. Four Khimik players scored in double figures. Even 22 points, 9 rebounds and 5 assists by swingman Denis Noskov (202-90) did not help to save the game for Cherkasy. International forward Alexander Sizov (199-88) added 10 points and 7 rebounds for the guests. Both coaches used bench players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games.

  CHERKASY (coach: Dmytro Nagornyi)72
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
7 AaJIL, SlRxijdRQ 46 6-8 (05%) 8-0 (35%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5 9 9 8 3 5 5 5 5 4 65 9 5
68 XIsVIL, gRjas 45 8-8 (655%) 0-2 (18.0%) 4-1 (05%) 4 1 7 0 8 5 6 5 5 8 88 89 5
66 ciLidsVF, AUijasliL 81 4-1 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 4-3 (90%) 5 4 4 5 0 5 6 6 5 6 7 3 5
45 SjUIjRUs, gBaUQI 83 4-4 (655%) 6-3 (80%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 7 8 5
3 SQUiBIjIL, KlFB 83 5-4 (5%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 4 5 5 6 5 5 8 1 0 5
86 KIMRUs, PlRVsijdQ 84 8-1 (44.4%) 6-4 (44.4%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5 4 4 4 8 5 6 5 5 8 7 0 5
1 Hill, viQQF 64 8-4 (11.9%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 6 0 5 5 5 5 5 3 -6 5
9 AhiliBIL, SjdQaa 68 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8-3 (05%) 6 8 4 5 0 5 5 5 5 6 8 -3 5
84 giLFdauV, SjUIj 7 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
63 AVipajUsRL, gBFUQI 6 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5
64 miliMij, YRLDRj 6 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -6 5
60 baQIshjFZhRjVI, biVsFB 6 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
wIUil   64-81 (05.5%) 66-80 (33.5%) 64-88 (07.6%) 0 84 82 63 82 5 3 6 5 66 98 33  


  KHIMIK87
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
66 yQiJaRQ, mQijdRj 89 4-3 (90%) 4-0 (15%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 9 5 5 8 5 5 5 60 84 5
83 KIjRL, klidaBaQ 84 8-0 (35%) 5-0 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 8 1 2 3 8 5 5 5 5 6 1 9 5
38 SjUFpIL, PlRVsijdQ 62 8-65 (85%) 6-6 (655%) 0-2 (18.0%) 8 4 0 5 3 5 6 5 5 8 68 6 5
64 mRlaVIL, PlRxijdQ 61 8-3 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 6 4 5 6 5 5 5 3 0 5
2 AhiT, biUUhRT 64 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 8 4 0 5 3 5 5 5 5 8 3 4 5
88 ORUQIL, kaiZhRsliL 86 3-68 (44.4%) 5-6 (5%) 3-0 (25%) 8 1 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 68 65 5
00 AadIQIL, ollFi 85 3-9 (09.6%) 5-4 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 8 5 8 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 7 4 5
86 OQIVIpRjVI, PlRVsijdQ 62 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 8 5 5 8 5 5 5 4 9 5
67 eFiMZhuV, PlRVsijdQ 69 6-6 (655%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 2 2 5
4 bilZhRLsVaF, kaUila 61 6-8 (05%) 6-6 (655%) 7-7 (655%) 4 8 0 5 6 5 5 6 5 6 63 69 5
3 OIpIL, ARQDRa 1 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5
84 OiLlIL, ARQDaF 5 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -6 5
wIUil   85-31 (34.0%) 2-86 (42.6%) 84-82 (28.6%) 63 89 36 85 88 5 9 6 5 9 29 24  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)