Ukraine
Finals Game 1: Khimik - Dynamo 77-79
Date: April 25, 2016
Dynamo escaped with a narrow road win over Khimik to victoriously start their SL Favorit Sport Finals campaign. Khimik was ahead by 10 points at the halftime before a 48-36 second half run of Dynamo. Naturalized Lithuanian center Michailis Anisimovas (215-84) nailed a double-double by scoring 20 points, 10 rebounds and 6 assists for the winning side and international guard Oleksandr Lypovyy (200-91) accounted for 22 points and 4 assists. American point guard Branden Frazier (190-92, college: Fordham) came up with 14 points and forward Oleksandr Antypov (202-95) added 16 points (on 7-of-8 shooting from the field) respectively for Khimik in the defeat. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. Khimik's coach Oleg Yushkin tried various players' combinations and tested in total eleven players in this game, but that didn't help.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Finals Game 1: Khimik - Dynamo 77-79
Date: April 25, 2016
Dynamo escaped with a narrow road win over Khimik to victoriously start their SL Favorit Sport Finals campaign. Khimik was ahead by 10 points at the halftime before a 48-36 second half run of Dynamo. Naturalized Lithuanian center Michailis Anisimovas (215-84) nailed a double-double by scoring 20 points, 10 rebounds and 6 assists for the winning side and international guard Oleksandr Lypovyy (200-91) accounted for 22 points and 4 assists. American point guard Branden Frazier (190-92, college: Fordham) came up with 14 points and forward Oleksandr Antypov (202-95) added 16 points (on 7-of-8 shooting from the field) respectively for Khimik in the defeat. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. Khimik's coach Oleg Yushkin tried various players' combinations and tested in total eleven players in this game, but that didn't help.
| DYNAMO79 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 6 | vFpILFF, PlRVsijdQ | 41 | 3-65 (35%) | 4-2 (49.0%) | 0-0 (655%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 88 | 69 | 5 |
| 80 | SjasaBILis, baZhialas | 40 | 2-68 (11.9%) | 5-6 (5%) | 3-0 (25%) | 3 | 1 | 65 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 85 | 83 | 5 |
| 2 | gQIJdIL, SQUuQ | 44 | 8-0 (35%) | 4-1 (05%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 64 | 9 | 5 |
| 84 | yujdRQMuQV, KRjjRF | 81 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 8 | ChaDQajIL, SlRxRF | 65 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 83 | AhujdRl, SjiUIlaF | 45 | 4-4 (655%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 8-8 (655%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 63 | 64 | 5 |
| 7 | ChRlILij, SjiUIlaa | 67 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6-6 (655%) | 6-8 (05%) | 4 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 64 | 5 |
| 60 | yuQs, PlRVsijdQ | 0 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 34 | gIDDRUU, ruajUIj | 8 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 64 | bislFuZhRjVI, qDIQ | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 85-41 (00.1%) | 7-89 (44.4%) | 68-61 (90.5%) | 65 | 67 | 87 | 67 | 61 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 97 | 94 | |||
 KHIMIK77 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 66 | yQiJaRQ, mQijdRj | 44 | 8-3 (05%) | 8-9 (82.1%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 64 | 5 |
| 83 | KIjRL, klidaBaQ | 46 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-8 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 66 | 5 |
| 2 | AhiT, biUUhRT | 83 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 5-0 (5%) | 1-1 (655%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 63 | 68 | 5 |
| 38 | SjUFpIL, PlRVsijdQ | 69 | 0-0 (655%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 61 | 63 | 5 |
| 64 | mRlaVIL, PlRxijdQ | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -3 | 5 |
| 4 | bilZhRLsVaF, kaUila | 86 | 4-4 (655%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 68 | 5 |
| 67 | eFiMZhuV, PlRVsijdQ | 67 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-0 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 88 | ORUQIL, kaiZhRsliL | 61 | 3-2 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 4-4 (655%) | 4 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 66 | 68 | 5 |
| 3 | OIpIL, ARQDRa | 63 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 5 |
| 00 | AadIQIL, ollFi | 2 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -3 | 5 |
| 86 | OQIVIpRjVI, PlRVsijdQ | 3 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 8 | GIjZhiQIL, PlRD | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 88-49 (07.0%) | 1-45 (85.5%) | 60-60 (655.5%) | 66 | 83 | 40 | 69 | 69 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 66 | 99 | 93 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
