Turkey
Quarter-Finals Round 2: Usak - Fener.Ulker 64-81
Date: May 20, 2016
Fenerbahce cruised past Usak on the road to complete the sweep. The game was mostly controlled by Fenerbahce Ulker. Usak Sportlif was better in second period 17-16. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. FYR Macedonian-Bulgarian power forward Pero Antic (211-82, agency: Beo Basket) orchestrated the victory by scoring 18 points and 9 rebounds. Italian forward Luigi Datome (203-87) contributed with 15 points and 7 rebounds for the winners. American swingman Paul Harris (193-86, college: Syracuse) replied with 14 points and 9 rebounds and Canadian center Khem Birch (208-92, college: UNLV) added 10 points and 9 rebounds in the effort for Usak Sportlif. Four Usak Sportlif players scored in double figures. Both coaches used bench players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Quarter-Finals Round 2: Usak - Fener.Ulker 64-81
Date: May 20, 2016
Fenerbahce cruised past Usak on the road to complete the sweep. The game was mostly controlled by Fenerbahce Ulker. Usak Sportlif was better in second period 17-16. But it was not enough to take a lead and get a victory that evening. FYR Macedonian-Bulgarian power forward Pero Antic (211-82, agency: Beo Basket) orchestrated the victory by scoring 18 points and 9 rebounds. Italian forward Luigi Datome (203-87) contributed with 15 points and 7 rebounds for the winners. American swingman Paul Harris (193-86, college: Syracuse) replied with 14 points and 9 rebounds and Canadian center Khem Birch (208-92, college: UNLV) added 10 points and 9 rebounds in the effort for Usak Sportlif. Four Usak Sportlif players scored in double figures. Both coaches used bench players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games.
 FENER.ULKER (coach: Sarunas Jasikevicius)81 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 68 | SjUaZ, ORQI | 87 | 4-1 (05%) | 3-0 (25%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 62 | 86 | 5 |
| 95 | giUIBR, vuaDa | 89 | 3-65 (35%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6-6 (655%) | 3 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 68 | 5 |
| 83 | kRsRlF, zij | 80 | 0-7 (00.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6 | 65 | 66 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 64 | 5 |
| 44 | KilajaZ, XaVIli | 83 | 4-3 (90%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 65 | 5 |
| 64 | mIDdijILaZ, mIDdij | 84 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| 40 | gaxIj, mIMMF | 84 | 6-8 (05%) | 8-9 (82.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 61 | AlIuVis, KIjsUijUajIs | 67 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 5 |
| 65 | bihBuUIDlu, bRlah | 63 | 8-8 (655%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 0 | 5 |
| 0 | HRQsRV, miQas | 7 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 62 | SQji, qDRhij | 8 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| 84 | tDuQlu, mRQV | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 88 | miFQiV, qQZij | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 67-49 (06.3%) | 64-89 (32.8%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 7 | 80 | 43 | 85 | 82 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 26 | 96 | |||
 USAK64 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 66 | HiQQas, Oiul | 41 | 4-0 (15%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 0-9 (96.3%) | 8 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 63 | 64 | 5 |
| 8 | HiQQas, SjdQR | 48 | 4-0 (15%) | 6-0 (85%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 0 | 5 |
| 1 | maQZh, KhRB | 48 | 3-65 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 3 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 66 | 5 |
| 3 | WiUsIj, GaIQdij | 45 | 6-1 (61.9%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 7 | -3 | 5 |
| 83 | KiaQFs, qLildis | 84 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-2 (68.0%) | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | -4 | 5 |
| 86 | HiQQasIj, g'SjDRlI | 86 | 6-8 (05%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 1-9 (20.9%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 65 | 5 |
| 2 | KIQVBiJ, Cij | 7 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 65 | SVZiF, Yujus | 7 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| 80 | qVBRj, Aihaj | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| 15 | YalBiJ, bRhBRU | 6 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 7 | AuQuZu, PJZij | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 4 | SdRBIDlu, bRsuU | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 64-45 (34.4%) | 1-85 (45.5%) | 85-44 (15.1%) | 7 | 88 | 46 | 9 | 67 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 68 | 13 | 46 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
