Lithuania
Semi-Finals Game 5: Lietuvos rytas - Neptunas 72-73
Date: May 22, 2016
Neptunas shocked Lietuvos Rytas in Vilnius to advance into LKL Finals. The guests were tied at the half but managed to speed up in last two quarters eventually winning the game. 24 personal fouls committed by Lietuvos rytas helped opponents get some easy free throw opportunities. American Daniel Ewing (191-83, college: Duke) saved the victory by scoring 24 points and 4 assists. Guard Martynas Mazeika (192-85, agency: Interperformances) contributed with 10 points for the winners. The former international center Antanas Kavaliauskas (208-84, college: Texas A&M, agency: Interperformances) answered with 16 points, 6 rebounds and 5 assists and international power forward Arturas Gudaitis (211-93) added 12 points and 7 rebounds in the effort for Lietuvos rytas. Both coaches used bench players in such tough game.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Semi-Finals Game 5: Lietuvos rytas - Neptunas 72-73
Date: May 22, 2016
Neptunas shocked Lietuvos Rytas in Vilnius to advance into LKL Finals. The guests were tied at the half but managed to speed up in last two quarters eventually winning the game. 24 personal fouls committed by Lietuvos rytas helped opponents get some easy free throw opportunities. American Daniel Ewing (191-83, college: Duke) saved the victory by scoring 24 points and 4 assists. Guard Martynas Mazeika (192-85, agency: Interperformances) contributed with 10 points for the winners. The former international center Antanas Kavaliauskas (208-84, college: Texas A&M, agency: Interperformances) answered with 16 points, 6 rebounds and 5 assists and international power forward Arturas Gudaitis (211-93) added 12 points and 7 rebounds in the effort for Lietuvos rytas. Both coaches used bench players in such tough game.
 LIETUVOS RYTAS (coach: Giedrius Zibenas)72 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 86 | KiLilaiusVis, SjUijis | 81 | 3-0 (25%) | 5-8 (5%) | 2-7 (22.7%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 61 | 81 | 5 |
| 64 | Gialaus, gRaLadis | 60 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | -6 | 5 |
| 69 | vuVishIL, gRjFs | 60 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| 61 | vipRUi, SdiB | 68 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| 88 | eujViusVis, biQaus | 68 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| 63 | PQRlaV, GRdaBajis | 81 | 8-8 (655%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 65 | 5 |
| 2 | vuViusVas, bajdiuDis | 83 | 5-5 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 5 |
| 44 | GudiaUas, SQUuQis | 84 | 4-1 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 1-65 (15%) | 6 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 69 | 5 |
| 9 | zusVRLaZaus, Sdis | 84 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | -8 | 5 |
| 8 | mQITj, KRj | 60 | 1-9 (20.9%) | 5-8 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 61 | 64 | 5 |
| 68 | viLQajILaZ, KsasUIf | 4 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 |
| 45 | zIBijUis, SQUuQis | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 67-89 (95.3%) | 4-64 (84.6%) | 80-44 (90.2%) | 4 | 62 | 86 | 61 | 83 | 80 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 63 | 98 | 97 | |||
 NEPTUNAS (coach: Gediminas Petrauskas)73 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 9 | biJRaVi, biQUFjis | 81 | 5-4 (5%) | 4-0 (15%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 65 | 9 | 5 |
| 30 | GQijU, zRQia | 81 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 5 |
| 1 | AaVsjaus, SQLFdis | 83 | 5-5 (5%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
| 2 | GaQdJaujis, bajdiuDis | 88 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 5 |
| 60 | AiQiViusVis, kFUiuUis | 60 | 5-4 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 4 | qTajD, gijaRl | 80 | 0-2 (18.0%) | 4-1 (05%) | 0-2 (18.0%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 83 | 84 | 5 |
| 68 | mQijdU, SjDus | 67 | 3-0 (25%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 65 | 5 |
| 64 | midRQ, wQiLas | 61 | 6-8 (05%) | 6-3 (80%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| 06 | muUVRLaZaus, SQjis | 63 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -8 | 5 |
| 33 | OliasURd, wQRjU | 7 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 36 | ciLiZVis, gIjiUis | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 45 | mRlaiusVis, viuQFjis | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 60-87 (06.9%) | 65-83 (36.9%) | 64-67 (12.3%) | 1 | 64 | 67 | 63 | 80 | 83 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 64 | 94 | 18 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
