Australia

Regular Season Round 18: Sandringham S. - Hobart C. 80-85

Date: July 17, 2016
The game between closely ranked teams ended with sixth ranked Hobart Chargers' (6-10) road victory over 7th ranked Sabres (4-13) 85-80 on Sunday. Hobart Chargers made 26-of-34 free shots (76.5 percent) during the game, while Sabres only scored five points from the stripe. Great defensive blocking was one of the keys in this match when Hobart Chargers made 7 blocks. The best player for the winners was American swingman Kathleen Scheer (187-89, college: Duke) who had a double-double by scoring 19 points, 12 rebounds and 4 blocks. Guard Eliza Chilcott (-90) chipped in 22 points and 9 rebounds. Four Hobart Chargers players scored in double figures. At the other side the best for losing team was American guard Brittany Smart (175-85, college: Cedarville) who recorded 26 points, 5 rebounds and 5 assists and her fellow American import guard Amy Patton (178-91, college: N.Arizona) added 20 points and 6 rebounds respectively. Sabres' coach tried various players' combinations and tested in total eleven players, but that didn't help to avoid defeat in this game. Hobart Chargers moved-up to fifth place in League. Loser Sabres keep the seventh position with 13 games lost. Hobart Chargers will face league's leader Spectres in East Burwood in the next round and it may be quite challenging game.

  HOBART C.85
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
7 ChalZIUU, qlaJi 41 1-63 (38.7%) 8-8 (655%) 3-2 (05%) 0 3 7 8 6 5 4 6 5 4 88 86 5
65 AZhTRRQs, ChRlsaR 41 1-63 (38.7%) 6-4 (44.4%) 1-1 (655%) 5 4 4 4 3 5 4 5 5 3 86 68 5
60 AZhRRQ, KiUhlRRj 41 2-61 (05%) 5-4 (5%) 4-4 (655%) 3 2 68 4 3 5 5 3 5 0 67 62 5
86 bZCiulRF, KFlaR 40 4-1 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 1-1 (655%) 8 0 9 4 8 5 5 5 5 6 68 61 5
88 bIQDij, osiMRllR 82 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 9-66 (14.1%) 8 4 0 5 5 5 6 8 5 8 7 65 5
1 whIBpsIj, AhiQji 65 6-8 (05%) 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 8 -4 5
83 CIllajs, qllaR 7 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 8 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5
66 bIlR, wiFlIQ 1 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 5
wIUil   80-00 (30.0%) 4-68 (80.5%) 81-43 (91.0%) 63 89 36 64 64 5 2 9 5 60 20 97  


  SANDRINGHAM S.80
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
65 AaBpsIj, qaladh 42 6-6 (655%) 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 5 0 0 1 8 5 6 5 5 6 2 63 5
66 OiUUIj, SBF 49 9-63 (05%) 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 5 1 1 6 4 5 4 5 5 6 85 61 5
7 ABiQU, mQaUUijF 40 0-66 (30.0%) 0-7 (00.1%) 6-6 (655%) 4 8 0 0 4 5 6 6 5 0 81 85 5
60 bIVQJFZVa, eRjiR 88 3-1 (11.9%) 5-4 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 3 4 9 6 3 5 6 5 5 8 65 2 5
86 GlRjjaR, AhRQQF 62 8-2 (80%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 6 4 3 8 8 5 5 5 5 6 0 6 5
2 GidsMF, Sliji 69 5-6 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8 5 8 6 8 5 6 5 5 8 5 -4 5
85 miUash, qlli 66 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5
3 zIllaffR, gRijji 9 8-8 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 6 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 5
64 OQaIQ, bRlassi 1 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 8 5 5 5 5 5 8 6 5
63 ABaUh, SBRlai 3 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5
1 vFUh, bIjaEuR 6 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 -8 5
wIUil   83-05 (32.5%) 7-80 (41.5%) 0-9 (96.3%) 68 88 43 62 88 5 9 6 5 63 25 15  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)