Poland
Regular Season Round 12: AZS PP - Domino Inowr. 58-80
Date: November 26, 2016
Very predictable result in Poznan where sixth ranked Domino Inowr. (6-4) smashed 11th ranked AZS PP (2-10) 80-58 on Saturday. They outrebounded AZS PP 45-31 including a 38-25 advantage in defensive rebounds. Worth to mention a great performance of guard Mateusz Marciniak (190-90) who helped to win the game recording 28 points and point guard Michal Warchowski (187-94) who added 3 points, 8 rebounds and 15 assists during the contest. The best for the losing side was Patryk Spojda (186-95) with 11 points and 6 rebounds and Filip Lorencki (191-96) scored 14 points. AZS PP's coach Waldemar Mendel gave up on the game allowing to play eleven players seeing no chance for a win. Domino Inowr. moved-up to fifth place, which they share with Sudety. AZS PP lost fourth consecutive game. They keep the eleventh position with ten games lost. Domino Inowr. will face Suchy Las (#13) in Poznan in the next round and are hoping to win another game.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 12: AZS PP - Domino Inowr. 58-80
Date: November 26, 2016
Very predictable result in Poznan where sixth ranked Domino Inowr. (6-4) smashed 11th ranked AZS PP (2-10) 80-58 on Saturday. They outrebounded AZS PP 45-31 including a 38-25 advantage in defensive rebounds. Worth to mention a great performance of guard Mateusz Marciniak (190-90) who helped to win the game recording 28 points and point guard Michal Warchowski (187-94) who added 3 points, 8 rebounds and 15 assists during the contest. The best for the losing side was Patryk Spojda (186-95) with 11 points and 6 rebounds and Filip Lorencki (191-96) scored 14 points. AZS PP's coach Waldemar Mendel gave up on the game allowing to play eleven players seeing no chance for a win. Domino Inowr. moved-up to fifth place, which they share with Sudety. AZS PP lost fourth consecutive game. They keep the eleventh position with ten games lost. Domino Inowr. will face Suchy Las (#13) in Poznan in the next round and are hoping to win another game.
AZS PP58 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 2 | euUVITsVa, biURusJ | 44 | 6-3 (80%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | -60 |
| 85 | ApIndi, OiUQFV | 81 | 6-8 (05%) | 4-7 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 66 | 7 | -7 |
| 76 | eIDulsVa, ziVuM | 84 | 8-3 (05%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 65 | -4 |
| 64 | vaUTaj, giBaij | 86 | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 3 | -0 |
| 84 | KQJFBajsVa, biZaRn | 67 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-0 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 6 | -69 |
| 00 | vIQRjZVa, yalap | 61 | 5-4 (5%) | 3-2 (05%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 63 | 65 | -3 |
| 65 | ChiMisajsVa, SdiB | 63 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 4 | -88 |
| 83 | bilRZVa, ziVuM | 63 | 6-0 (85%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 | -4 | -63 |
| 7 | AIMaRZh, zij | 63 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -4 | -63 |
| 4 | mIMRQ, ziVuM | 2 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | -9 |
| 61 | eudiTsVa, baVIlin | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| wIUil | 7-48 (82.6%) | 66-43 (48.3%) | 9-66 (14.1%) | 1 | 80 | 46 | 60 | 69 | 64 | 66 | 8 | 0 | 61 | 02 | 38 | |||
DOMINO INOWR.80 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 1 | KIQjanRZ, mIDdij | 41 | 8-2 (80%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 67 |
| 63 | KIJlITsVa, KQJFsJUIf | 43 | 3-2 (05%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8 | 2 | 65 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 67 | 85 |
| 65 | WiQZhITsVa, baZhil | 44 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 2 | 2 | 60 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 82 | 81 |
| 64 | biQZajaiV, biURusJ | 82 | 4-4 (655%) | 9-64 (04.2%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 82 | 84 | 69 |
| 0 | binRQ, biQZaj | 88 | 3-2 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 68 | 1 |
| 43 | AUijZJuV, biURusJ | 88 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 4 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 64 | 62 |
| 7 | vRTijdITaZJ, baVIlin | 63 | 5-6 (5%) | 4-0 (15%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 65 | 2 | 2 |
| 85 | yQRujd, KiZpRQ | 1 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | -0 | -3 |
| 83 | chiludIV, gijaRl | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 88 | OIBaRZajsVa, OaIUQ | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 69-42 (33.9%) | 63-82 (05.5%) | 3-9 (09.6%) | 9 | 42 | 30 | 85 | 64 | 69 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 86 | 25 | 658 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)




