Sweden
Second Stage Round 2: IK Eos - Helsingborg 88-68
Date: January 18, 2017
Everything went according to plan in Lund where IK Eos (7-1) outscored Helsingborg (4-5) 88-68 on Wednesday. The game without a history. IK Eos led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. Guard Gustav Sundstrom (197-91) scored 23 points and 9 rebounds to lead the charge for the winners and point guard Adnan Karovic (188-88) chipped in 14 points and 4 assists during the contest. Forward Gustav Claesson (197-97) responded with 16 points and 8 rebounds and forward Patrik Andersson (191-94) scored 15 points. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. Both coaches allowed to play bench players saving starting five for next games. IK Eos will face Talje Knights (#5) at home in the next round. Helsingborg will play against Lobas in Lomma and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Second Stage Round 2: IK Eos - Helsingborg 88-68
Date: January 18, 2017
Everything went according to plan in Lund where IK Eos (7-1) outscored Helsingborg (4-5) 88-68 on Wednesday. The game without a history. IK Eos led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. Guard Gustav Sundstrom (197-91) scored 23 points and 9 rebounds to lead the charge for the winners and point guard Adnan Karovic (188-88) chipped in 14 points and 4 assists during the contest. Forward Gustav Claesson (197-97) responded with 16 points and 8 rebounds and forward Patrik Andersson (191-94) scored 15 points. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. Both coaches allowed to play bench players saving starting five for next games. IK Eos will face Talje Knights (#5) at home in the next round. Helsingborg will play against Lobas in Lomma and it may be a tough game between close rivals.
 HELSINGBORG68 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 66 | mQijdU, SjUIj | 87 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 9 | -61 |
| 65 | SjdRQssIj, OiUQaV | 82 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 8-9 (82.1%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 60 | 66 | -0 |
| 7 | ORQssIj, qQaV | 82 | 8-66 (62.8%) | 4-2 (49.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 0 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 64 | 0 | -88 |
| 2 | AalfLRQ, CispRQ | 81 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | -1 |
| 9 | zIRlssIj, qQaV | 83 | 8-7 (88.8%) | 5-8 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 4 | -64 |
| 3 | ORQssIj, SjUIj | 83 | 3-0 (25%) | 5-0 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 65 | 1 | -68 |
| 63 | CliRssIj, GusUiL | 85 | 2-64 (16.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 1 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 61 | 68 | -85 |
| 64 | mQajV, OiUQaV | 1 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | -4 |
| 68 | mRQjMIQD, bijfQRd | 0 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -3 |
| 1 | osBial, eiBa | 0 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -6 | 6 |
| wIUil | 84-04 (34.3%) | 0-83 (85.2%) | 9-68 (02.4%) | 61 | 69 | 44 | 60 | 64 | 5 | 68 | 5 | 5 | 61 | 12 | 30 | |||
 IK EOS88 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 1 | AujdsUQIB, GusUiL | 89 | 66-60 (94.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 84 | 46 | 65 |
| 9 | GnIQup, Xals | 86 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-3 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 0 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 64 |
| 0 | bIUFVi, gijaRl | 85 | 5-6 (5%) | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 64 |
| 64 | KilRj, HiBpus | 85 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 66 |
| 2 | KiQlssIj, PllR | 69 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | -8 | 9 |
| 3 | KiQILaZ, Sdjij | 83 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 6-8 (05%) | 4-4 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 63 | 60 | 65 |
| 63 | XdJaMi, qMRjRJRQ | 85 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 65 | bIQiZijaj, bixaB | 60 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 64 | 60 |
| 7 | SdijILuQ, KIfa | 60 | 3-0 (25%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 66 | 66 | 65 |
| 66 | PjRBi, CiQl-RQaZ | 7 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| 68 | AVIMiln, yalap | 2 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| 60 | cdQiLRLsVa, zILij | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 45-37 (16.8%) | 2-86 (42.6%) | 3-9 (09.6%) | 68 | 89 | 47 | 62 | 60 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 62 | 22 | 22 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
