Finland

Regular Season Round 23: Huima - Espoo Utd 69-120

Date: February 18, 2017
The game with biggest result difference took place in Aanekoski. Local Aanekosken (7-15) was outscored by second ranked Espoo Utd (15-7) 120-69 on Saturday night. The game without a history. Espoo Utd led from the first minutes and controlled entire game increasing their lead in each quarter. Espoo Utd outrebounded Aanekosken 48-25 including a 30-13 advantage in defensive rebounds. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 21 assists. Worth to mention a quality performance of American forward Shenita Landry (188-87, college: Temple) who helped to win the game recording a double-double by scoring 24 points and 17 rebounds (on 10-of-13 shooting from the field). Her fellow American import forward Tabatha Richardson-Smith (183, college: Seton Hall) helped adding 25 points, 12 rebounds and 4 assists. Five Espoo Utd players scored in double figures. Ghanian forward Batabe Zempare (188-94, college: CSU Bakersfield, agency: LBM Management) responded with 22 points and 7 rebounds and American swingman Robin Murphy (185-88, college: S.Mississippi) scored 12 points, 5 rebounds and 4 assists. Newly promoted Espoo Utd maintains second place with 15-7 record having four points less than leader HyPo. Loser Aanekosken keeps the ninth position with 15 games lost. Espoo Utd will meet ViVe (#8) in the next round which should be theoretically another easy game. Aanekosken will play against ViVe and it may be a tough game between close rivals.

  ESPOO UTD120
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
60 AijdRll, AiiQi 82 8-4 (11.9%) 3-2 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 4 6 6 6 5 5 5 61 62 46
3 bajji bila 81 5-5 (5%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5 0 0 8 6 5 5 6 5 8 1 65 88
1 eaZhiQdsIj-ABaUh, wiMiUhi 80 0-1 (24.4%) 4-1 (05%) 1-9 (20.9%) 0 9 68 3 5 1 8 4 5 6 80 31 88
9 vijdQF, AhRjaUi 80 65-64 (91.7%) 5-5 (5%) 3-3 (655%) 2 7 69 6 8 3 6 5 5 8 83 35 84
65 XuQBa, qllRj 83 1-9 (20.9%) 5-3 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 8 4 0 3 8 6 8 5 5 6 64 61 36
63 OIujds, gaIjjR 84 8-3 (05%) 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8 8 3 1 8 8 6 5 5 6 3 7 87
36 KuasBi, Kiasi 67 8-3 (05%) 3-1 (11.9%) 6-6 (655%) 5 6 6 6 5 6 4 5 5 8 69 69 35
84 kiiliLaQUi, Kai 61 8-3 (05%) 6-4 (44.4%) 4-3 (90%) 5 5 5 5 3 4 5 5 6 6 65 8 43
83 SaQiVsajRj, zRBaji 7 6-8 (05%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 5 6 5 5 5 6 0 4 64
wIUil   45-34 (17.2%) 60-41 (36.9%) 60-62 (24.4%) 62 45 32 86 68 67 65 3 6 66 685 616  


  HUIMA69
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
7 eijdIlph, yiaUh 41 4-64 (84.6%) 4-3 (90%) 6-8 (05%) 5 6 6 4 8 3 8 5 5 3 61 2 -37
4 buQphF, eIMaj 44 1-68 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 6 3 0 3 8 8 6 5 5 6 68 64 -33
64 XuQBa, qBBa-zulai 46 5-3 (5%) 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 6 3 0 6 8 8 6 5 8 6 1 4 -49
9 eFUVIjRj, KiQIlaaji 46 4-9 (38.7%) 5-3 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 4 6 3 0 3 5 8 5 8 4 1 5 -40
33 cRBpiQR, miUiMR 45 7-68 (90%) 5-6 (5%) 3-3 (655%) 0 8 9 5 3 3 6 6 5 6 88 81 -40
68 OiinijRj, HRjji-eaaVVi 64 5-3 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8 6 4 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 -4 -86
66 KFBiliajRj, vIUUi 7 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 8 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 -64
84 KFFQIjRj, KQasUi 9 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -6 -65
44 AuIBa, kalBi 0 5-5 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 4 6 -66
88 vRpaVVI, zIhijji  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
86 vaaBiUiajRj, kRjli  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   84-02 (47.9%) 1-60 (35.5%) 0-2 (18.0%) 68 64 80 60 67 68 9 6 3 68 17 39  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)