Australia

Regular Season Round 21: Hume City - Whittlesea City 96-67

Date: July 22, 2017
There was no surprise in Tullamarine where 12th ranked Whittlesea City (2-19) was crushed by tenth ranked Hume City Broncos (7-14) 96-67 on Saturday. Hume City Broncos outrebounded Whittlesea City 53-33 including a 34-22 advantage in defensive rebounds. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 26 assists comparing to just 10 passes made by Whittlesea City's players. The best player for the winners was naturalized British guard Lee Jeka (193-83) who had a double-double by scoring 39 points (!!!), 10 rebounds and 4 assists. American guard Mike Rose (193-87, college: E.Kentucky) chipped in 24 points, 7 rebounds and 6 assists. At the other side the best for losing team was Dominic Bruno who recorded 23 points and Emmerson Potts-Broughton added 9 points and 11 rebounds respectively. Whittlesea City's coach gave up on the game allowing to play ten players seeing no chance for a win. Hume City Broncos moved-up to ninth place in League. Loser Whittlesea City keeps the twelfth position with 19 games lost. Hume City Broncos will face higher ranked Diamond Valley Eagles (#8) in Greensborough in the next round and it will be quite challenging to get another victory. Whittlesea City will play at home against Stingrays (#11) and it may be a tough game between close rivals.

  HUME CITY96
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
66 zRVi, vRR 47 1-9 (20.9%) 2-69 (39.6%) 4-3 (90%) 9 4 65 3 8 5 4 5 5 4 47 35 5
11 eIsR, baVR 49 7-60 (15%) 8-65 (85%) 5-5 (5%) 6 1 9 1 8 5 4 8 5 4 83 84 5
68 CliFUIj, wQRLIj 49 8-8 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-3 (5%) 2 7 69 9 8 5 5 8 5 5 3 83 5
88 qDij, vuVR 40 4-9 (38.7%) 6-9 (63.4%) 8-8 (655%) 6 7 65 4 6 5 6 6 5 8 66 64 5
2 OQRjdRQDisU, Ahiuj 83 5-4 (5%) 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 6 0 1 0 6 5 6 5 5 5 1 66 5
65 AZhifRQ, zusUaj 7 5-5 (5%) 6-3 (80%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 4 -8 5
04 eRjURQai, Ohall 9 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 6 8 6 5
45 PeaRlRF, z 0 6-6 (655%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 8 5 5 5 5 8 0 8 5
  vTil gaajD 8 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 4 5
wIUil   84-49 (18.8%) 60-30 (44.4%) 0-65 (05.5%) 67 43 04 81 64 5 2 0 5 66 71 660  


  WHITTLESEA CITY67
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
61 biFMijV, zIjiUhij 41 3-68 (44.4%) 6-3 (80%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 8 4 5 4 5 5 8 66 3 5
68 cRLRQIji, Sadij 41 4-1 (05%) 5-9 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 6 0 1 3 8 5 8 5 5 8 2 1 5
45 mQujI, gIBajaZ 43 4-7 (44.4%) 3-7 (33.3%) 0-9 (96.3%) 8 5 8 8 5 5 6 5 5 8 84 64 5
2 OIUUs-mQIuDhUIj, qBBRQsIj 46 4-0 (15%) 5-4 (5%) 4-1 (05%) 3 9 66 5 6 5 5 5 5 4 7 2 5
81 kij-vujRjMuQD, gRij 46 3-1 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 6 8 4 6 8 5 5 5 5 8 2 3 5
0 WiUsIj, whIBis 64 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 8 1 5
7 SjdRQsRj, w 9 6-8 (05%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 8 5 5
  ABaUh, eIQF 9 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 8 3 5
85 KilasUu, ARQhij 4 6-4 (44.4%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 8 5 5
  yQRRBij, XiUhij 4 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 -6 5
wIUil   86-39 (33.9%) 0-80 (85.5%) 65-69 (02.2%) 66 88 44 65 66 5 7 5 5 66 19 33  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)