Australia

Regular Season Round 21: C.District L. - Norwood F. 77-97

Date: July 22, 2017
Very predictable result in Gawler where third ranked Norwood Flames (12-6) outscored 9th ranked Central District Lions (3-15) 97-77 on Saturday. Norwood Flames shot 33 for 44 from the free-throw line, while Central District Lions only scored four points from the stripe. They outrebounded Central District Lions 58-44 including a 42-26 advantage in defensive rebounds. Norwood Flames looked well-organized offensively handing out 21 assists. Central District Lions were plagued by 30 personal fouls down the stretch. The best player for the winners was guard Matthew Lycett (194-90) who had a double-double by scoring 25 points, 13 rebounds and 5 assists. American guard Kellen Smith (185-93, college: Saginaw Valley) chipped in 22 points, 5 rebounds and 6 assists. Five Norwood Flames players scored in double figures. At the other side the best for losing team was guard David Humphries (193-91, college: Loyola Mary) who recorded 8 points and 8 rebounds and guard Nelson Larkins (180-96) added 11 points respectively. Both coaches used bench players and allowed the starting five to rest. Norwood Flames maintains third place in League with 12-6 record having just three point less than leader Mackay M. Loser Central District Lions keep the ninth position with 15 games lost. Both teams do not play next round, which will be an opportunity for some rest.

  C.DISTRICT L.77
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
0 viQVajs, XRlsIj 67 6-4 (44.4%) 4-0 (15%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 8 6 5 6 5 5 5 66 66 5
85 biVIa, bIjFniUh 67 0-1 (24.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 6 8 4 6 0 5 5 6 5 6 65 9 5
1 biQUaj, eaZiQdI 69 6-7 (66.6%) 6-4 (44.4%) 6-8 (05%) 8 8 3 5 3 5 6 5 5 3 1 -2 5
66 AVuZR, m 69 6-1 (61.9%) 6-3 (80%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 6 8 5 5 5 5 5 0 5 5
3 AipTRll, KIRj 69 6-0 (85%) 5-3 (5%) 5-4 (5%) 5 8 8 5 8 5 8 5 5 8 8 -7 5
30 HuBphQaRs, giLad 69 3-9 (09.6%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 3 3 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 2 65 5
63 XiUhij, mQIdaR 69 4-2 (49.0%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 1 8 5
5 qiQl, giLad 69 4-3 (90%) 5-5 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 4 3 9 5 8 5 6 6 5 5 1 65 5
  maLIjR, baZhiRl 69 8-3 (05%) 5-6 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 8 6 4 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 0 4 5
83 AUIjR, AiaruIj 61 8-0 (35%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8 6 4 4 6 5 5 6 5 8 3 3 5
64 CujjajDhiB, S 61 6-0 (85%) 5-5 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 8 4 0 6 8 5 6 6 5 8 3 3 5
9 HIffBijj, wFsIj 68 8-8 (655%) 8-1 (44.4%) 5-8 (5%) 6 5 6 6 0 5 5 5 5 6 65 5 5
wIUil   81-13 (35.1%) 9-89 (80.7%) 3-60 (81.9%) 62 81 33 60 45 5 1 3 5 64 99 43  


  NORWOOD F.97
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
3 ABaUh, KRllRj 48 3-9 (09.6%) 8-2 (80%) 2-66 (98.9%) 6 3 0 1 4 5 6 5 5 8 88 69 5
0 WuQB, XaZV 89 6-3 (80%) 6-0 (85%) 2-2 (655%) 6 4 3 8 4 5 8 5 5 3 64 9 5
63 vFZRUU, biUUhRT 81 1-65 (15%) 6-1 (61.9%) 65-63 (96.3%) 1 9 64 0 8 5 6 5 5 5 80 87 5
66 WRMMRQ, SjdQRT 80 8-8 (655%) 8-7 (88.8%) 6-8 (05%) 8 2 65 3 5 5 5 5 5 6 66 61 5
64 vIjD, biUUhRT 83 0-2 (18.0%) 5-5 (5%) 3-3 (655%) 3 65 63 8 8 5 5 5 5 5 63 80 5
88 ApuQQaUU, ziBRs 69 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 5 3 5 5 6 5 4 5 -4 5
2 CIUUIj, viZhlij 61 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 8-4 (11.9%) 6 8 4 5 8 5 5 6 5 5 1 1 5
65 zijssij, mRjniBaj 64 8-8 (655%) 5-4 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 6 4 3 8 6 5 8 5 5 6 3 0 5
9 muQfIQd, vuVR 64 6-8 (05%) 5-4 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 5 8 5 8 5 5 3 8 -3 5
  AURRlR, q 9 5-8 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 -3 5
wIUil   84-35 (09.0%) 1-41 (61.9%) 44-33 (90.5%) 61 38 02 86 67 5 2 8 5 60 79 73  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)