Poland

Regular Season Round 24: Domino Inowr. - Suchy Las 89-64

Date: February 24, 2018
Not a big story in a game in Inowroclaw where 13th ranked Suchy Las (5-19) were outplayed by sixth ranked Domino Inowr. (15-10) 89-64 on Saturday. Domino Inowr. shot the lights out from three sinking 15 long-distance shots on high 53.6 percentage. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 26 assists comparing to just 12 passes made by Suchy Las' players. The best player for the winners was point guard Michal Warchowski (187-94) who had a double-double by scoring 13 points, 6 rebounds and 16 assists. Guard Krystian Rosinski (190-98) chipped in 21 points. Four Domino Inowr. players scored in double figures. At the other side the best for losing team was Jakub Simon (202-96) who recorded 12 points and 9 rebounds and guard Maksymilian Motel (187-0) added 13 points and 5 assists respectively. Since the result was very predictable, it gave the chance for the coaches to test many bench players and allowed the starting five to rest. Domino Inowr. moved-up to fifth place in Group A, which they share with Gniezno. Loser Suchy Las keep the thirteenth position with 19 games lost. Domino Inowr. will face Goleniow (#14) on the road in the next round and are hoping to win another game. Suchy Las will play against SMS PZKosz and hope to win that game.

  DOMINO INOWR.89
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
65 WiQZhITsVa, baZhil 40 3-9 (09.6%) 6-3 (80%) 8-3 (05%) 5 1 1 61 6 3 8 5 5 6 64 46 45
66 miQijsVa, zulausJ 43 1-65 (15%) 5-6 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 4 7 68 6 8 8 6 5 6 8 63 85 89
7 eIsajsVa, KQFsUaij 82 4-0 (15%) 0-9 (96.3%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 4 4 5 6 5 6 4 86 62 86
63 KIJlITsVa, KQJFsJUIf 81 5-4 (5%) 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 6 9 2 8 6 6 4 5 5 6 1 68 62
43 AIlUFsaiV, GQJRDIQJ 80 8-9 (82.1%) 5-5 (5%) 6-3 (80%) 6 6 8 6 4 8 6 5 5 6 0 -6 89
9 KIjaRZJVi, KiBal 67 5-5 (5%) 3-9 (09.6%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 6 3 5 5 6 5 5 68 65 3
0 binRQ, biQZaj 63 3-9 (09.6%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 6 3 0 6 6 4 6 5 5 4 7 66 4
44 KIQIlZJFV, gijaRl 66 5-6 (5%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 8
85 XaniV, KiZpRQ 6 5-5 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 8 4 5 -6
64 WilZJiV, AJFBIj 6 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 6 -6
88 KQIVITsVa, baVIlin  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
2 zijVITsVa, HuMRQU  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   67-35 (39.0%) 60-82 (04.1%) 1-68 (05.5%) 2 43 38 81 62 68 7 6 8 63 27 650  


  SUCHY LAS64
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
05 AaBIj, ziVuM 44 1-68 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 2 7 6 4 4 5 6 5 5 68 69 -88
61 GaJFjsVa, ziQIsliT 89 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 8 3 1 6 3 4 5 6 5 8 0 2 -63
62 vRTijdITsVa, SlRVsijdRQ 81 0-65 (05%) 5-4 (5%) 4-3 (90%) 6 4 3 4 6 8 6 5 5 3 64 7 -61
2 eiMR, mliJRn 81 3-7 (33.3%) 5-6 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 6 0 1 5 6 8 5 5 6 6 2 1 -88
6 bIURl, biVsFBalaij 83 3-65 (35%) 5-0 (5%) 0-9 (96.3%) 5 8 8 0 6 1 4 5 5 6 64 63 -63
5 WIQIjaRZVa, biQZaj 83 5-5 (5%) 6-1 (61.9%) 5-5 (5%) 6 8 4 6 5 6 5 5 5 8 4 6 -68
8 wIBisJRTsVa, WInZaRZh 64 5-3 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 5 8 5 5 5 5 4 4 -4 -66
63 KQinRTsVa, SjdQJRn 65 4-3 (90%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 3 5 3 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 9 66 -66
9 SdiBZJiV, SlRVsijdRQ 1 5-8 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 -8 5
4 caIlRV, miQUIsJ 0 5-6 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 -6 -4
wIUil   83-00 (34.1%) 8-62 (66.6%) 65-61 (18.0%) 65 82 42 68 68 62 0 8 6 64 13 15  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)