Australia
Regular Season Round 3: Forestville E. - Sturt S. 82-95
Date: March 24, 2018
But Forestville Eagles were not able to use a home court advantage and lost to the opponent from Pasadena 95-82 on Saturday night. Sturt Sabres looked well-organized offensively handing out 26 assists comparing to just 13 passes made by Forestville Eagles' players. The best player for the winners was Ben Carter (-99) who had a double-double by scoring 23 points and 10 rebounds. American point guard Nate Garth (188-89, college: UCSB) chipped in a double-double by scoring 12 points, 11 rebounds and 8 assists. Five Sturt Sabres players scored in double figures. At the other side the best for losing team was American guard Jalen Richard (193-94, college: CS East Bay) who recorded 28 points, 6 rebounds and 6 assists and forward Akol Deng (201, college: Lamar St.CC) added 6 points and 18 rebounds respectively. Both coaches allowed to play bench players saving starting five for next games. Both teams do not play next round, which will be an opportunity for some rest.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 3: Forestville E. - Sturt S. 82-95
Date: March 24, 2018
But Forestville Eagles were not able to use a home court advantage and lost to the opponent from Pasadena 95-82 on Saturday night. Sturt Sabres looked well-organized offensively handing out 26 assists comparing to just 13 passes made by Forestville Eagles' players. The best player for the winners was Ben Carter (-99) who had a double-double by scoring 23 points and 10 rebounds. American point guard Nate Garth (188-89, college: UCSB) chipped in a double-double by scoring 12 points, 11 rebounds and 8 assists. Five Sturt Sabres players scored in double figures. At the other side the best for losing team was American guard Jalen Richard (193-94, college: CS East Bay) who recorded 28 points, 6 rebounds and 6 assists and forward Akol Deng (201, college: Lamar St.CC) added 6 points and 18 rebounds respectively. Both coaches allowed to play bench players saving starting five for next games. Both teams do not play next round, which will be an opportunity for some rest.
 FORESTVILLE E.82 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| eaZhiQd, zilRj | 42 | 9-62 (42.7%) | 3-63 (82.1%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 82 | 64 | 5 | |
| 45 | HiQQas, baZhiRl | 87 | 3-2 (05%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4-4 (655%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 66 | 2 | 5 |
| gRjD, SVIl | 87 | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 1 | 68 | 62 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 61 | 5 | |
| vuVR Ohallaps | 83 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 3 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | |
| WQaDhU, AURfij | 88 | 3-65 (35%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 | |
| 85 | bIQphRUU, baZhiRl | 86 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 65 | 5 |
| Walls, KRjjRUh | 69 | 3-65 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
| WajURQ, wIdd | 7 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | |
| bIQaiQUF, gijaRl | 9 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 5 | |
| 2 | mRll, CiBRQIj | 0 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 35 | CQIxUIj, zilRj | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| CiBRQlRjDI, ciZhRQF | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | |||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 45-12 (33.6%) | 3-85 (85.5%) | 65-62 (00.1%) | 85 | 45 | 05 | 64 | 60 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 28 | 17 | |||
 STURT S.95 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 9 | KliIsRj, waB | 41 | 0-2 (18.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 3-0 (25%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 63 | 88 | 5 |
| GiQUh, XiUR | 40 | 0-63 (40.9%) | 5-7 (5%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6 | 65 | 66 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 68 | 2 | 5 | |
| 7 | CiQURQ, mRj | 87 | 7-64 (17.8%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8-0 (35%) | 8 | 2 | 65 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 84 | 82 | 5 |
| 2 | biUUhRTs, CilR | 81 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-3 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -6 | 5 |
| 62 | Xish, gijaRl | 84 | 6-3 (80%) | 4-7 (44.4%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 6 | 5 |
| 65 | AhIQUU, baZhiRl | 86 | 5-6 (5%) | 3-3 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 68 | 63 | 5 |
| GIIdill, whIBis | 61 | 1-9 (20.9%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 86 | 5 | |
| 1 | WiQMIuU, zij | 66 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| 3 | miuRQ, biQV | 8 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| WRllajDUIj, baUZh | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| eulR, biUU | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | |||||||||||||||||
| HujU, wIMF | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | |||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 82-05 (01.5%) | 65-45 (44.4%) | 7-69 (08.7%) | 65 | 46 | 36 | 81 | 60 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 70 | 72 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
