Spain
Regular Season Round 32: Mataro Feimat - JAC Sants 98-64
Date: April 28, 2018
Everything could happen at the game between two tied teams. Both tenth ranked Mataro Feimat and 9th ranked JAC Sants had identical 10-15 record. This time Mataro Feimat used a home court advantage and outplayed the opponent from Barcelona 98-64 on Saturday night. Mataro Feimat dominated down low during the game scoring 56 of its points in the paint compared to JAC Sants' 28. Mataro Feimat had a 34-20 advantage in offensive rebounds. The best player for the winners was guard Jaume Sole (196-91) who scored 27 points. David Romero (-90) chipped in 21 points and 8 rebounds. Four Mataro Feimat players scored in double figures. Mataro Feimat's coach felt very confident that he used 11 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Javier Balastegui (187-97) produced 13 points and forward Gerard Rodriguez (190-98) added 13 points respectively for the guests. Mataro Feimat (11-15) moved-up to ninth place in Group C-B. Loser JAC Sants dropped to the bottom position with 16 games lost.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 32: Mataro Feimat - JAC Sants 98-64
Date: April 28, 2018
Everything could happen at the game between two tied teams. Both tenth ranked Mataro Feimat and 9th ranked JAC Sants had identical 10-15 record. This time Mataro Feimat used a home court advantage and outplayed the opponent from Barcelona 98-64 on Saturday night. Mataro Feimat dominated down low during the game scoring 56 of its points in the paint compared to JAC Sants' 28. Mataro Feimat had a 34-20 advantage in offensive rebounds. The best player for the winners was guard Jaume Sole (196-91) who scored 27 points. David Romero (-90) chipped in 21 points and 8 rebounds. Four Mataro Feimat players scored in double figures. Mataro Feimat's coach felt very confident that he used 11 players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. Javier Balastegui (187-97) produced 13 points and forward Gerard Rodriguez (190-98) added 13 points respectively for the guests. Mataro Feimat (11-15) moved-up to ninth place in Group C-B. Loser JAC Sants dropped to the bottom position with 16 games lost.
 JAC SANTS64 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 88 | milisURDua, ziLaRQ | 40 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 4-2 (49.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 64 | 64 | 5 |
| 65 | eIdQaDuRJ, GRQiQd | 46 | 4-1 (05%) | 6-3 (80%) | 3-0 (25%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 64 | 64 | 5 |
| 85 | eRjiu, eIDRQ | 87 | 5-8 (5%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 5 |
| 7 | yRQjijdRJ, giLad | 84 | 6-1 (61.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 8 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| 0 | euf, biQZ | 86 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 6-1 (61.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 66 | 4 | 5 |
| 64 | biQZI, ARQDa | 85 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 65 | 5 |
| 68 | AaBIj, SlMRQU | 67 | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 |
| 9 | GIjJilRJ, PsZiQ | 62 | 8-0 (35%) | 6-3 (80%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 5 |
| wIUil | 63-35 (40.5%) | 2-45 (81.9%) | 68-69 (95.1%) | 66 | 85 | 46 | 65 | 64 | 67 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 13 | 03 | |||
 MATARO FEIMAT98 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 68 | eIBRQI, giLad | 89 | 2-64 (16.0%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 86 | 82 | 5 |
| 9 | ARQDa, kRjUuQi | 84 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 8 | AIlR, ziuBR | 88 | 1-1 (655%) | 0-66 (30.0%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 89 | 82 | 5 |
| 0 | CiMQRQi, zIsR | 86 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 65 | 5 |
| 63 | qspaDi, NiLaRQ | 85 | 6-3 (80%) | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 4 | 5 |
| 60 | wiQdaI, yRQQij | 85 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| 3 | ARQQiUiZI, AijUaiDI | 67 | 9-2 (29.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 63 | 69 | 5 |
| 4 | GuilliQ, yQRdRQaZ | 62 | 8-3 (05%) | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 65 | 65 | 5 |
| 2 | kajillIjDi, SlMRQU | 64 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 84 | zuijIli, zIQda | 2 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 5 |
| 86 | AIli, zIij | 3 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| wIUil | 82-36 (12.4%) | 68-83 (05.5%) | 1-7 (11.9%) | 8 | 43 | 41 | 62 | 67 | 64 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 66 | 72 | 660 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
