Australia

Regular Season Round 9: NW Tasmania - Geelong S. 96-78

Date: May 5, 2018
We cannot really consider it an upset in the game between close teams in Ulverstone where 5th ranked Geelong Supercats (2-3) were defeated by sixth ranked NW Tasmania Thunder (3-3) 96-78 on Saturday. The hosts trailed by 6 points after first quarter, but they stormed back to get the 8-point lead at the halftime and eventually won the game 96-78. NW Tasmania Thunder made 16-of-21 free shots (76.2 percent) during the game. They also forced 19 Geelong Supercats turnovers. Strangely Geelong Supercats outrebounded NW Tasmania Thunder 43-24 including a 16-3 advantage in offensive rebounds. The best player for the winners was American forward Jeremiah Ingram (201-93, college: N.C.Central) who scored 25 points and 6 rebounds. Guard Lachlan Barker (179-96) chipped in 24 points. Four NW Tasmania Thunder players scored in double figures. At the other side the best for losing team was American guard Demarcus Gatlin (193, college: Sam Houston St.) who recorded a double-double by scoring 20 points and 12 rebounds and the other American import forward John Davis (196-94, college: Towson) added 18 points and 11 rebounds respectively. Geelong Supercats' coach let to play ten players seeing no chance for a win. NW Tasmania Thunder maintains sixth place in League with 3-3 record which they share with defeated Geelong Supercats. Loser Geelong Supercats dropped to the sixth position with three games lost. NW Tasmania Thunder will face higher ranked Dandenong Rangers (#4) on the road in the next round and it will be quite challenging to get another victory.

  GEELONG S.78
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
0 GiUlaj, gRBiQZus 46 2-60 (04.4%) 5-5 (5%) 3-7 (33.3%) 9 0 68 6 8 5 5 5 5 6 85 62 5
65 giLas, zIhj 46 2-69 (39.6%) 5-6 (5%) 8-4 (11.9%) 0 1 66 4 3 5 6 5 5 0 62 64 5
66 HRQMRQU, XiUhij 45 3-66 (41.3%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 3 0 6 3 5 5 5 5 6 2 8 5
60 HaZVs, biSlI 89 8-4 (11.9%) 6-8 (05%) 8-8 (655%) 6 1 9 4 8 5 8 5 5 4 7 63 5
2 mlaZiLs, KQas 86 4-3 (90%) 6-6 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 4 5 6 6 5 8 7 1 5
63 baZhiRl vuxfIQd 86 6-4 (44.4%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 8 5 5 6 5 5 0 8 -6 5
86 eIZZa, KQasUaij 60 5-8 (5%) 8-3 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 8 5 5 5 5 8 1 5 5
83 bZojRQjRF, vaiB 64 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 5
08 bRdLRd, ziBaR 1 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 -6 5
69 yQRajd, XiUhij 8 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 8 8 5
wIUil   87-14 (31.5%) 3-65 (35.5%) 2-63 (09.6%) 61 89 34 66 69 5 0 6 5 67 92 01  


  NW TASMANIA96
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
3 ojDQiB, zRQRBaih 49 2-60 (04.4%) 8-1 (44.4%) 4-3 (90%) 5 1 1 8 8 5 3 5 5 4 80 85 5
2 miQVRQ, viZhlij 46 0-9 (96.3%) 4-2 (49.0%) 0-0 (655%) 5 6 6 4 6 5 8 5 5 5 83 88 5
1 mQiDD, bisIj 45 0-7 (00.1%) 6-8 (05%) 0-9 (96.3%) 5 6 6 0 4 5 5 5 5 8 62 68 5
7 ChalZIUU, zIR 87 5-8 (5%) 3-0 (25%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 5 5 6 5 5 6 68 65 5
86 Oiul CiBpMRll 81 3-1 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 4 0 2 6 3 5 4 3 5 6 7 61 5
88 bilIjR, giQZF 60 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 5 3 5 5 5 5 4 5 -0 5
63 SQBsUQIjD, mQidF 63 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5 3 3 5 8 5 5 5 5 6 8 8 5
8 WIIllRF, mRj 7 5-5 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 9 5
6 ziZVsIj, KIMR 0 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 8 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 6 5
wIUil   88-47 (01.3%) 68-80 (32.5%) 61-86 (91.8%) 4 86 83 63 61 5 65 3 5 68 71 20  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)