Australia
Regular Season Round 9: Melbourne T. - Sandringham S. 83-78
Date: May 6, 2018
Not a big story in a game in Melbourne where 7th ranked Sabres (2-6) were defeated by fifth ranked Tigers (3-3) 83-78 on Sunday. Sabres trailed by 11 points after 3 quarters before a 19-13 run in the last quarter cut the deficit to 78-83 at the end of the game. The best player for the winners was guard Dexter Kernich-Drew (198-91, college: Washington St.) who scored 32 points and 5 rebounds. Guard Tom Wilson (195-97, college: SMU) chipped in a double-double by scoring 18 points and 11 rebounds. At the other side the best for losing team was the former international forward David Barlow (205-83, college: Metro St.) who recorded a double-double by scoring 13 points and 10 rebounds and guard Alister Macdonald (186-92) added 18 points respectively. Four Sabres players scored in double figures. Tigers maintains fifth place in League with 3-3 record. Loser Sabres keep the seventh position with six games lost. Tigers will face league's leader Bendigo Braves at home in the next round and it will be quite challenging to get another victory. Sabres will play against the league's second-placed Ballarat Miners (#2) in Wendouree and hope to win that game.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 9: Melbourne T. - Sandringham S. 83-78
Date: May 6, 2018
Not a big story in a game in Melbourne where 7th ranked Sabres (2-6) were defeated by fifth ranked Tigers (3-3) 83-78 on Sunday. Sabres trailed by 11 points after 3 quarters before a 19-13 run in the last quarter cut the deficit to 78-83 at the end of the game. The best player for the winners was guard Dexter Kernich-Drew (198-91, college: Washington St.) who scored 32 points and 5 rebounds. Guard Tom Wilson (195-97, college: SMU) chipped in a double-double by scoring 18 points and 11 rebounds. At the other side the best for losing team was the former international forward David Barlow (205-83, college: Metro St.) who recorded a double-double by scoring 13 points and 10 rebounds and guard Alister Macdonald (186-92) added 18 points respectively. Four Sabres players scored in double figures. Tigers maintains fifth place in League with 3-3 record. Loser Sabres keep the seventh position with six games lost. Tigers will face league's leader Bendigo Braves at home in the next round and it will be quite challenging to get another victory. Sabres will play against the league's second-placed Ballarat Miners (#2) in Wendouree and hope to win that game.
 MELBOURNE T.83 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 63 | WalsIj, wIB | 42 | 3-2 (05%) | 8-65 (85%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 5 | 66 | 66 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 62 | 67 | 5 |
| 7 | KRQjaZh-gQRT, gRxURQ | 49 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 1-68 (05%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 48 | 83 | 5 |
| 0 | majRs, ziZV | 46 | 4-2 (49.0%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | -8 | 5 |
| 60 | SZuIUh, gRjD | 89 | 3-3 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-3 (05%) | 4 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 65 | 68 | 5 |
| 3 | HuDhRs, mallF | 85 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-0 (85%) | 6-3 (80%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | -4 | 5 |
| 9 | gaxIj, mRj | 67 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 88 | KIsUuQ, gRnij | 68 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 4 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | -6 | 5 |
| 68 | wIdd, ziBRs | 2 | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 1 | kaaUili, bix | 3 | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -4 | 5 |
| wIUil | 88-36 (04.9%) | 7-45 (45.5%) | 68-83 (05.5%) | 64 | 83 | 49 | 60 | 88 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 68 | 24 | 00 | |||
 SANDRINGHAM S.78 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 85 | miQlIT, giLad | 40 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 4-9 (38.7%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6 | 7 | 65 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 64 | 63 | 5 |
| 9 | biZdIjild, SlasURQ | 89 | 8-2 (80%) | 4-1 (05%) | 0-0 (655%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 62 | 0 | 5 |
| 64 | HidJaIBRQILaZ, oDIQ | 80 | 0-7 (00.1%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 65 | 65 | 5 |
| 68 | miUash, ziBaR | 80 | 5-6 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 5 |
| 60 | PjTuViBuZhR, eRDDas | 83 | 8-9 (82.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 4 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| 1 | Pdujsa, SjUhIjF | 62 | 4-3 (90%) | 6-3 (80%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 63 | 9 | 5 |
| 65 | CQIssTRll, XiUhij | 62 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
| 86 | OuIjdiV, biVuRa | 68 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | -4 | 5 |
| 66 | KRjjF, yajj | 66 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| 63 | CaDIDjaja, ziBRs | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 61-47 (36.5%) | 65-88 (30.0%) | 61-86 (91.8%) | 2 | 83 | 48 | 7 | 86 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 69 | 92 | 08 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
