Poland

Regular Season Round 4: Domino Inowr. - Suchy Las 95-73

Date: October 20, 2018
Everything could happen in Inowroclaw at the game between two tied teams. Both fifth ranked Domino Inowr. and 6th ranked Suchy Las had identical 1-1 record. This time Domino Inowr. used a home court advantage and outscored the opponent from Poznan 95-73 on Saturday night. Domino Inowr. dominated down low during the game scoring 58 of its points in the paint compared to Suchy Las' 32. Domino Inowr. forced 20 Suchy Las turnovers and outrebounded them 43-29 including 28 on the defensive glass. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 21 assists. Suchy Las were plagued by 24 personal fouls down the stretch. Krzysztof Kozlowski (198-92) fired a double-double by scoring 23 points and 10 rebounds for the winners. Swingman Juliusz Baranski (196-96) chipped in 16 points and 9 rebounds. Five Domino Inowr. players scored in double figures. Jaroslaw Gizynski (198-99) produced 16 points and 7 rebounds (made all of his seven free throws) and guard Aleksander Adamczak (192-0) added 21 points respectively for lost side. Domino Inowr. (2-1) moved-up to fourth place in Group A. Loser Suchy Las dropped to the eighth position with two games lost. Domino Inowr. will face AZS UMK Torun (#10) on the road in the next round where they are favorite. Suchy Las will play against Tarnovia and it may be a tough game between close rivals.

  DOMINO INOWR.95
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
2 KQiTaRZ, biURusJ 46 0-2 (18.0%) 6-1 (61.9%) 6-8 (05%) 8 8 3 8 6 3 4 5 4 5 63 63 61
7 KIQIlZJFV, gijaRl 46 5-8 (5%) 8-1 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 8 5 5 5 6 5 8 1 0 67
66 miQijsVa, zulausJ 45 0-9 (96.3%) 5-5 (5%) 1-2 (90%) 6 2 7 8 6 0 8 5 5 5 61 87 62
63 KIJlITsVa, KQJFsJUIf 82 7-66 (26.2%) 6-3 (80%) 8-8 (655%) 3 1 65 8 6 3 8 5 5 6 84 43 88
85 biZaRnRTsVa, KiBal 82 4-68 (80%) 6-8 (05%) 4-9 (38.7%) 3 4 9 2 4 1 5 5 8 4 68 66 84
0 binRQ, biQZaj 61 0-1 (24.4%) 5-5 (5%) 9-2 (29.0%) 8 4 0 5 4 3 5 5 5 3 69 69 1
9 WiQZhITsVa, baZhil 60 8-8 (655%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 0 4 6 8 5 5 4 9 2 9
65 XaniV, KiZpRQ 7 5-5 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 8 5 5 5 5 6 5 -4 5
69 zijF, OaIUQ 1 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 8 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 5 8 4
88 KIjaRZJVi, KiBal  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
64 zijVITsVa, HuMRQU  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   87-32 (15.3%) 1-86 (82.1%) 67-89 (95.3%) 60 82 34 86 63 83 7 6 0 61 70 669  


  SUCHY LAS73
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
61 GaJFjsVa, ziQIsliT 48 4-2 (49.0%) 6-4 (44.4%) 9-9 (655%) 5 9 9 4 8 4 6 4 5 4 61 86 -67
66 WasjaRTsVa, SlRVsijdRQ 87 8-9 (82.1%) 6-4 (44.4%) 8-8 (655%) 5 5 5 3 4 8 0 5 5 4 7 9 -2
63 KQinRTsVa, SjdQJRn 87 3-66 (41.3%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 7 1 60 5 0 3 5 5 6 0 2 7 -62
9 SdiBZJiV, SlRVsijdRQ 82 8-0 (35%) 0-7 (00.1%) 8-8 (655%) 5 6 6 6 4 6 5 6 5 6 86 63 -83
65 caIlRV, miQUIsJ 80 5-8 (5%) 8-0 (35%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 3 5 5 5 5 8 1 -3 -61
1 AIMaRZh, AJFBIj 84 4-3 (90%) 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5 4 4 3 3 3 8 5 5 8 7 64 5
7 KlRsJZJ, baVIlin 60 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 6 8 8 4 5 6 5 5 6 3 3 -3
2 bujFiBi, yalap 65 5-8 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 5 5 8 6 5 4 5 -6 -67
64 muQJFjsVa, oDIQ 0 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 -8
0 wIBisJRTsVa, WInZaRZh  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   61-34 (49.8%) 65-83 (36.9%) 66-66 (655.5%) 65 67 87 69 83 63 66 0 6 85 94 14  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)