Holland
Regular Season Round 5: Windmills - Limburg 70-52
Date: November 4, 2018
Bottom-ranked Weert (0-6) tried to put together a comeback for its first victory of the season, but they fell short in the 70-52 loss to fifth ranked Dutch Windmills (4-1) in Dordrecht. American forward Shavon Coleman (196-92, college: LSU, agency: Court Side) nailed a double-double by scoring 21 points and 13 rebounds for the winning side and swingman Pim De-Vries (193-95) accounted for 14 points and 4 assists (on 6-of-7 shooting from the field). American center Tony Washington (208, college: La Salle) came up with a double-double by scoring 15 points and 13 rebounds and forward Wietze Nossek (201-98) added 10 points and 5 rebounds respectively for Weert in the defeat. Weert's coach Radenko Varagic tested ten players seeing no chance for a win. The victory was the fourth consecutive win for Dutch Windmills. They moved-up to fourth place. Weert lost their sixth game in a row. They still close the standings with six games lost. Dutch Windmills' next round opponent will be Leeuwarden (#6) at home. Weert will play against Rotterdam (#9) and hopes to get finally their first victory.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 5: Windmills - Limburg 70-52
Date: November 4, 2018
Bottom-ranked Weert (0-6) tried to put together a comeback for its first victory of the season, but they fell short in the 70-52 loss to fifth ranked Dutch Windmills (4-1) in Dordrecht. American forward Shavon Coleman (196-92, college: LSU, agency: Court Side) nailed a double-double by scoring 21 points and 13 rebounds for the winning side and swingman Pim De-Vries (193-95) accounted for 14 points and 4 assists (on 6-of-7 shooting from the field). American center Tony Washington (208, college: La Salle) came up with a double-double by scoring 15 points and 13 rebounds and forward Wietze Nossek (201-98) added 10 points and 5 rebounds respectively for Weert in the defeat. Weert's coach Radenko Varagic tested ten players seeing no chance for a win. The victory was the fourth consecutive win for Dutch Windmills. They moved-up to fourth place. Weert lost their sixth game in a row. They still close the standings with six games lost. Dutch Windmills' next round opponent will be Leeuwarden (#6) at home. Weert will play against Rotterdam (#9) and hopes to get finally their first victory.
 LIMBURG (coach: Radenko Varagic)52 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 88 | WishajDUIj, wIjF | 43 | 0-65 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 3 | 7 | 64 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 60 | 61 | 5 |
| 64 | eIsRjBullRQ, giij | 87 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | -4 | 5 |
| 0 | AaBaZ, oLij | 82 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8-2 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| 9 | AZhald, zulRs | 84 | 6-0 (85%) | 5-3 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -6 | 5 |
| 3 | GIQassRj, XajI | 86 | 5-6 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 5 |
| 66 | SdQaiijs, yQRdRQaV | 86 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 68 | XIssRV, WaRUJR | 85 | 8-3 (05%) | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 65 | 9 | 5 |
| 1 | kij-HRuVRlIB, eIMaj | 67 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | -6 | 5 |
| 2 | HIllijdRQs, AijdRQ | 3 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 7 | mijdi, SBRQ | 6 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 63-44 (38.3%) | 0-83 (85.2%) | 7-68 (90.5%) | 66 | 84 | 43 | 9 | 86 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 62 | 08 | 85 | |||
 WINDMILLS70 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 60 | CIlRBij, AhiLIj | 44 | 3-7 (33.3%) | 4-0 (15%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 8 | 66 | 64 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 86 | 83 | 5 |
| 3 | eaZhiQdsIj, eFij | 45 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 6-2 (68.0%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 64 | 1 | 5 |
| 0 | kij-PLRQMRRV, eIRl | 87 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-8 (5%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 9 | gR-kQaRs, OaB | 80 | 3-0 (25%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 63 | 83 | 5 |
| 65 | KIZh, mRjjRUU | 80 | 3-66 (41.3%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 5 |
| 64 | KIV, zaUI | 88 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| 7 | eIRssajV, HaddR | 64 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | -4 | 5 |
| 1 | HiBBajV, XaZV | 64 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | -6 | 5 |
| 4 | wIpilILaZ, AURfij | 65 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | -3 | 5 |
| 69 | HIIDsURdRj, AiVR | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 85-35 (05.5%) | 1-67 (46.1%) | 68-86 (09.6%) | 66 | 83 | 40 | 68 | 60 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 68 | 95 | 02 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
