Bahamas

Regular Season Round 3: Pros - Bahamas Univ. 69-96

Date: November 19, 2018
Another exciting game was a derby match between two teams from Nassau: Mingoes (#1) and Pros (#8). Pros were crushed at home by 27 points 69-96 and even the advantage of their own court did not help. Mingoes dominated down low during the game scoring 62 of its points in the paint compared to Pros' 28. Mingoes forced 22 Pros turnovers. Their players were unselfish on offense dishing 25 assists. The best player for the winners was guard Ramon Dames (-93, college: Carl Albert JC) who scored 15 points and 5 assists. Forward Antwan Bevans (198, college: Casper CC) chipped in 13 points and 8 rebounds. At the other side the best for losing team was Colton Albury who recorded 15 points and 8 rebounds and Judino Wilson added 15 points respectively. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. Mingoes' supporters look forward to another derby game next round, where their team will travel locally in Nassau to the arena Shockers.

  BAHAMAS UNIV.96
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
66 giBRs, eiBIj 81 4-0 (15%) 8-8 (655%) 4-4 (655%) 5 8 8 0 5 8 8 5 5 6 60 84 83
65 ABaUh, zusUaj 80 5-6 (5%) 6-1 (61.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5 3 3 1 8 6 8 5 5 6 4 9 2
6 mRLijs, SjUTij 85 0-7 (00.1%) 5-5 (5%) 4-3 (90%) 6 9 2 6 4 4 6 6 5 8 64 69 61
84 AFlLRsURQ, KRBsF 85 3-9 (09.6%) 5-8 (5%) 8-3 (05%) 6 6 8 1 4 4 4 6 5 4 65 68 61
4 AUuQQup, eishid 69 8-9 (82.1%) 5-5 (5%) 5-4 (5%) 0 4 2 5 4 8 5 5 5 8 3 6 68
45 Aijds-zQ, wFQIjR 64 3-1 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 4 3 6 6 5 6 6 5 6 2 66 80
46 gRij, gIjILij 68 0-0 (655%) 6-0 (85%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 6 5 6 64 65 61
68 XaZhIlis, wQiLiuDhj 68 6-4 (44.4%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 6 0 1 5 8 5 6 6 5 5 2 66 -6
83 bZKRjJaR, ChQasUIff 68 6-8 (05%) 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 8 6 4 8 4 5 5 5 5 6 2 9 60
60 mQITj, WallaiB 66 8-4 (11.9%) 5-8 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 8 6 4 8 6 6 5 6 5 4 0 0 2
86 bZojUIsh, ziLiQRs 7 5-6 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 -4 4
48 CIQjash, eIBRQI 9 8-8 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 8 5 6 5 5 8 3 6 -3
88 zRjjajDs, mQaij 0 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 4 3 8 -6
8 zIhjsIj, tniBii 4 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 5 5 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 5 -8
44 ORjjRQBij, ciZhiQF  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   46-03 (09.3%) 2-80 (48.5%) 65-69 (02.2%) 61 87 30 80 83 64 66 1 6 85 71 653  


PROS69
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
34 SlMuQF, CIlUIj 89 9-63 (05%) 5-8 (5%) 6-6 (655%) 8 1 2 5 8 6 5 5 6 8 60 65 -7
84 yRQDusIj, gRQQaZV 89 5-6 (5%) 0-63 (40.9%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 6 6 6 8 5 5 8 60 9 -88
2 WalsIj, zudajI 80 8-1 (44.4%) 5-8 (5%) 66-63 (92.1%) 6 5 6 4 6 2 4 5 5 0 60 60 -83
1 biQshill, eIj 84 6-0 (85%) 5-6 (5%) 3-1 (11.9%) 6 8 4 8 8 3 8 5 8 4 1 4 -60
3 CiQURQ, XiUhijail 84 5-4 (5%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 8 5 -3 -68
88 muQQITs, AURphij 86 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 4 4 1 9 5 5 4 5 5 4 8 64 -4
05 AUQiZhij, wQRssijU 62 6-9 (63.4%) 5-5 (5%) 6-4 (44.4%) 4 0 2 8 3 4 5 6 6 4 4 6 -69
66 Aijds, wFQIjR 61 6-0 (85%) 5-5 (5%) 7-65 (75%) 6 4 3 5 8 0 5 5 8 5 66 66 -9
43 eIllR, OiUQaZV 7 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 6 6 8 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 -8 -64
0 SlZadIjas, qjsI 2 6-6 (655%) 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 6 5 6 5 5 8 8 5 -64
83 wiFlIQ, KQiBRQ  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
64 ballRQ, AURLR  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   63-39 (87.2%) 0-86 (84.2%) 81-41 (98.8%) 64 88 40 61 63 84 66 6 1 88 17 03  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)