Poland
Regular Season Round 14: Domino Inowr. - Gniezno 78-95
Date: December 22, 2018
There was a minor upset in Inowroclaw where 6th ranked Domino Inowr. (6-7) was defeated by eighth ranked Gniezno (5-7) 95-78 on Saturday. Gniezno looked well-organized offensively handing out 23 assists. The best player for the winners was Michal Szydlowski (197-87) who had a double-double by scoring 21 points and 18 rebounds. Forward Dariusz Dobrzycki (193-84) chipped in 21 points and 5 assists. Rafal Komenda (200-98) produced a double-double by scoring 23 points and 10 rebounds and point guard Kamil Maciejewski (188-91) added 16 points, 6 rebounds and 10 assists respectively for the hosts. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. Gniezno maintains eighth position in Group A with 5-7 record. Loser Domino Inowr. dropped to the fifth place with seven games lost. Gniezno will face higher ranked Miedzychod (#4) on the road in the next round and it may be quite challenging game.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 14: Domino Inowr. - Gniezno 78-95
Date: December 22, 2018
There was a minor upset in Inowroclaw where 6th ranked Domino Inowr. (6-7) was defeated by eighth ranked Gniezno (5-7) 95-78 on Saturday. Gniezno looked well-organized offensively handing out 23 assists. The best player for the winners was Michal Szydlowski (197-87) who had a double-double by scoring 21 points and 18 rebounds. Forward Dariusz Dobrzycki (193-84) chipped in 21 points and 5 assists. Rafal Komenda (200-98) produced a double-double by scoring 23 points and 10 rebounds and point guard Kamil Maciejewski (188-91) added 16 points, 6 rebounds and 10 assists respectively for the hosts. Both teams had four players each who scored in double figures. Gniezno maintains eighth position in Group A with 5-7 record. Loser Domino Inowr. dropped to the fifth place with seven games lost. Gniezno will face higher ranked Miedzychod (#4) on the road in the next round and it may be quite challenging game.
 DOMINO INOWR.78 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 22 | KIBRjdi, eifil | 40 | 2-68 (11.9%) | 6-8 (05%) | 3-9 (09.6%) | 8 | 2 | 65 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 84 | 45 | -68 |
| 85 | biZaRnRTsVa, KiBal | 40 | 3-7 (33.3%) | 6-0 (85%) | 0-66 (30.0%) | 8 | 3 | 1 | 65 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 61 | 84 | -0 |
| 7 | KIQIlZJFV, gijaRl | 44 | 8-1 (44.4%) | 3-63 (82.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 61 | 2 | -0 |
| 9 | WiQZhITsVa, baZhil | 45 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | -1 |
| 63 | KIJlITsVa, KQJFsJUIf | 89 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6-0 (85%) | 0-2 (18.0%) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 68 | 60 | -65 |
| 66 | miQijsVa, zulausJ | 60 | 6-3 (80%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | -63 |
| 88 | KIjaRZJVi, KiBal | 65 | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 9 | -60 |
| 2 | KQiTaRZ, biURusJ | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-4 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -4 | -63 |
| 8 | vRTijdITaZJ, baVIlin | 0 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | -3 |
| 64 | zijVITsVa, HuMRQU | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 65 | XaniV, KiZpRQ | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| 69 | zijF, OaIUQ | gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj | ||||||||||||||||
| wIUil | 69-43 (05.5%) | 65-44 (45.4%) | 63-81 (04.7%) | 7 | 89 | 41 | 86 | 67 | 86 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 92 | 22 | |||
 GNIEZNO (coach: Arkadiusz Konowalski)95 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 88 | AIMVITaiV, biQRV | 49 | 9-7 (99.2%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 60 | 88 | 66 |
| 83 | WaRUQJFjsVa, giQausJ | 43 | 6-3 (80%) | 5-3 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | -8 | 65 |
| 8 | eiu, qBal | 48 | 3-65 (35%) | 4-3 (90%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 69 | 68 | 1 |
| 65 | AJFdlITsVa, baZhil | 46 | 3-2 (05%) | 4-0 (15%) | 3-1 (11.9%) | 3 | 63 | 62 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 86 | 43 | 6 |
| 89 | XIZRV, biQZaj | 80 | 6-6 (655%) | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 69 |
| 48 | gIMQJFZVa, giQausJ | 62 | 6-8 (05%) | 3-9 (09.6%) | 9-2 (29.0%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 86 | 83 | 85 |
| 30 | vRsjaZJiV, OaIUQ | 65 | 6-6 (655%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 63 | 88 |
| 64 | ChBaRlRTsVa, qQFV | 1 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -0 | -9 |
| 66 | biQIsJRV, gIBajaV | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 0 |
| wIUil | 67-40 (03.4%) | 60-46 (32.3%) | 68-62 (11.9%) | 9 | 45 | 49 | 84 | 86 | 67 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 66 | 70 | 650 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
