Poland
Regular Season Round 16: Politechnika Gd. - Notec Inowr. 113-68
Date: January 12, 2019
The game between Top Four teams took place in Gdansk. Top-ranked host Politechnika Gd. (15-0) smashed 3rd ranked Notec Inowr. (11-4) 113-68. Politechnika Gd. dominated down low during the game scoring 80 of its points in the paint compared to Notec Inowr.'s 44 and made 18-of-20 free shots (90.0 percent) during the game. Politechnika Gd. forced 25 Notec Inowr. turnovers. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 34 assists comparing to just 20 passes made by Notec Inowr.'s players. Great defensive blocking was one of the keys in this match when Politechnika Gd. made 7 blocks. Przemyslaw Szymanski (198-84, agency: Promotex) fired 16 points, 8 rebounds and 4 assists for the winners. Power forward Piotr Karpacz (202-98) chipped in 16 points, 8 rebounds and 5 blocks. Four Politechnika Gd. players scored in double figures. Center Wojciech Zurawski (202-76) produced a double-double by scoring 15 points and 12 rebounds and Damian Szczepanik (198-97) added 10 points and 8 rebounds respectively for lost side. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. Politechnika Gd. have an impressive 13-game winning streak. They maintain first position in Group A with 15-0 record. Loser Notec Inowr. keeps the third place with four games lost. Politechnika Gd. will meet Arka II (#7) in the next round where they are favorite. Notec Inowr. will play against SMS PZKosz (#11) and hope to secure a win and be promoted back to the 1Liga just one year after relegation.
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 16: Politechnika Gd. - Notec Inowr. 113-68
Date: January 12, 2019
The game between Top Four teams took place in Gdansk. Top-ranked host Politechnika Gd. (15-0) smashed 3rd ranked Notec Inowr. (11-4) 113-68. Politechnika Gd. dominated down low during the game scoring 80 of its points in the paint compared to Notec Inowr.'s 44 and made 18-of-20 free shots (90.0 percent) during the game. Politechnika Gd. forced 25 Notec Inowr. turnovers. They looked well-organized offensively handing out 34 assists comparing to just 20 passes made by Notec Inowr.'s players. Great defensive blocking was one of the keys in this match when Politechnika Gd. made 7 blocks. Przemyslaw Szymanski (198-84, agency: Promotex) fired 16 points, 8 rebounds and 4 assists for the winners. Power forward Piotr Karpacz (202-98) chipped in 16 points, 8 rebounds and 5 blocks. Four Politechnika Gd. players scored in double figures. Center Wojciech Zurawski (202-76) produced a double-double by scoring 15 points and 12 rebounds and Damian Szczepanik (198-97) added 10 points and 8 rebounds respectively for lost side. The winner was already known earlier in the game, so both coaches allowed to play the bench players saving starting five for next games. Politechnika Gd. have an impressive 13-game winning streak. They maintain first position in Group A with 15-0 record. Loser Notec Inowr. keeps the third place with four games lost. Politechnika Gd. will meet Arka II (#7) in the next round where they are favorite. Notec Inowr. will play against SMS PZKosz (#11) and hope to secure a win and be promoted back to the 1Liga just one year after relegation.
NOTEC INOWR. (coach: Krzysztof Szubarga)68 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 84 | AJZJRpijaV, giBaij | 45 | 8-2 (80%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 65 | 65 | -40 |
| 63 | cuQiTsVa, WInZaRZh | 89 | 0-66 (30.0%) | 5-5 (5%) | 0-1 (24.4%) | 65 | 8 | 68 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 60 | 88 | -41 |
| 6 | miQsJZJFV, SdQaij | 81 | 0-9 (96.3%) | 5-3 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 68 | 1 | -85 |
| 80 | yalapaiV, SlRVsijdRQ | 80 | 3-65 (35%) | 5-6 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 7 | 9 | -46 |
| 9 | KITilRTsVa, biQZaj | 86 | 8-9 (82.1%) | 6-3 (80%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 0 | -82 |
| 64 | biQZajaiV, biURusJ | 86 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-0 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | -3 | -44 |
| 4 | GQJRsajsVa, ARMisUaij | 60 | 6-3 (80%) | 5-3 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | -0 | -60 |
| 1 | gudi, WInZaRZh | 7 | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-3 (80%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | -66 |
| 62 | eJIsajsVa, biQZaj | 9 | 8-8 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | -8 |
| 85 | WilZJiV, AJFBIj | 9 | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | -9 |
| 3 | KQRUVITsVa, wIBisJ | 3 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| 66 | KQIVITsVa, baVIlin | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | -2 |
| wIUil | 88-08 (38.4%) | 3-84 (69.3%) | 68-62 (11.9%) | 61 | 80 | 36 | 85 | 62 | 69 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 80 | 12 | 05 | |||
POLITECHNIKA GD. (coach: Marek Kielczewski)113 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 65 | AJFBijsVa, OQJRBFsliT | 89 | 9-65 (95%) | 5-3 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 61 | 88 | 47 |
| 2 | bilZJFV, biQZaj | 89 | 8-3 (05%) | 8-9 (82.1%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 65 | 61 | 47 |
| 7 | KiQpiZJ, OaIUQ | 86 | 9-68 (02.4%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 61 | 80 | 87 |
| 85 | wQRMITaZJ, biURusJ | 67 | 9-2 (29.0%) | 6-1 (61.9%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 67 | 84 | 60 |
| 60 | ciluZVa, SlRVsijdRQ | 62 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 8-2 (80%) | 3-3 (655%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 68 | 7 | 86 |
| 8 | OasJZJiUITsVa, OiUQFV | 63 | 3-1 (11.9%) | 5-6 (5%) | 0-9 (96.3%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 64 | 64 | 9 |
| 3 | AVaMi, SdiB | 63 | 3-3 (655%) | 5-8 (5%) | 6-6 (655%) | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 61 | 83 |
| 48 | biQZhlRTsVa, AURfij | 64 | 8-3 (05%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 69 |
| 97 | zisVaRTaZJ, vuVisJ | 68 | 4-0 (15%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 66 |
| 1 | vRTajsVa, vuVisJ | 66 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 66 |
| 33 | gRQVITsVa, ziVuM | 66 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| 5 | eRjVaRl, OaIUQ | 1 | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 66 | 2 |
| wIUil | 35-18 (13.0%) | 0-87 (69.8%) | 62-85 (75.5%) | 69 | 46 | 32 | 43 | 69 | 61 | 67 | 9 | 6 | 66 | 664 | 615 | |||
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)




