Brazil

Regular Season Round 11: UniFacisa - Pato Basquete 85-73

Date: April 6, 2019
The game with biggest result difference took place in . Local UniFacisa (6-5) beat 7th ranked Pato Basquete (3-7) 85-73. It was a quality performance for American guard Nick Okorie (185-88, college: Texas Tech) who led the winners and scored 23 points and 5 rebounds. His fellow American import point guard Nate Barnes (178-90, college: Alders.-Broad.) accounted for 24 points and 4 assists for the winning side. Guard Rafael Castellon (192-85) came up with 18 points, 8 rebounds and 4 assists and Eric Soares (205-86) added 14 points and 10 rebounds respectively for Pato Basquete in the defeat. Both coaches used bench players which allowed the starters a little rest for the next games. UniFacisa maintains fourth place with 6-5 record, which they share with Campo Mourao. Pato Basquete at the other side keeps the seventh position with seven games lost. UniFacisa's next round opponent will be Campo Mourao (#5) at home. Pato Basquete will play against Cerrado and hope to win that game.
Top scorers:
UniFacisa: N.Barnes 24+4ast, N.Okorie 23+5reb+1ast, A.Parisotto 15+9reb+2ast, P.Nery 7+1reb+1ast, L.Fernando Lima 5+7reb, R.Reis 5+3reb+2ast
Pato Basquete: R.Castellon 18+8reb+4ast, E.Soares 14+10reb+2ast, I.Thornton 9+3reb, L.Da Da Silva 8+3reb+2ast, S.Rafael 7+1reb, D.Phillips 5+3ast
gschID: 711350

  PATO BASQUETE (coach: Andre Soares)73
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
5 whIQjUIj, osiiZ 41 3-1 (11.9%) 5-8 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 6 8 4 5 4 6 5 5 5 6 7 3 -63
2 CisURllIj, eifiRl 43 6-8 (05%) 0-2 (18.0%) 6-8 (05%) 6 9 2 3 8 6 5 5 5 6 62 84 -64
1 gi-AalLi, vRijdQI-gi 83 6-6 (655%) 8-2 (80%) 5-5 (5%) 6 8 4 8 4 8 5 5 5 6 2 0 -9
65 eIMRQUsIj, SQVaB 69 6-0 (85%) 5-5 (5%) 8-8 (655%) 6 6 8 6 4 8 5 5 5 6 3 6 -0
4 Ohallaps, gIBajaZ 61 6-3 (80%) 5-6 (5%) 4-4 (655%) 5 5 5 4 6 4 6 5 5 4 0 3 -3
64 AIiQRs, qQaZ 88 6-0 (85%) 8-8 (655%) 1-1 (655%) 5 65 65 8 8 0 5 6 5 5 63 81 -63
69 OajhRaQI, SlRxijdQR 63 5-5 (5%) 6-1 (61.9%) 5-5 (5%) 5 8 8 5 4 6 5 5 5 4 4 -0 -8
62 gRQaZV biZhidI 64 8-8 (655%) 5-5 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 5 8 8 5 8 6 8 5 5 6 0 1 2
82 bIllRQ, mRQjiQdI 68 5-6 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 6 8 5 5 5 5 6 5 -3 -65
0 AijUIs, eifiRl 9 8-3 (05%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 9 0 6
68 PlaLRaQi, CiaI  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   64-45 (34.4%) 66-46 (40.0%) 63-69 (28.3%) 3 82 48 64 86 61 4 6 5 68 94 10  


  UNIFACISA85
  FIELD GOALS REBOUNDS   FOULS   BLOCKS  
#   NAME MIN 2PM-A 3PM-A FTM-A OFF DEF RB AS F RV ST FV AG TO PT RNK +/-
43 miQjRs, XiUR 40 1-7 (11.9%) 4-7 (44.4%) 4-3 (90%) 5 5 5 3 8 3 6 5 5 4 83 62 69
8 PVIQaR, XaZV 44 4-9 (38.7%) 3-9 (09.6%) 0-2 (18.0%) 6 3 0 6 8 1 6 5 5 5 84 83 2
83 viQQF, eRDDaR 87 8-1 (44.4%) 5-3 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 8 2 65 6 8 6 6 5 5 8 3 0 61
60 OiQasIUUI, SudQRa 82 3-3 (655%) 8-0 (35%) 6-8 (05%) 5 7 7 8 8 6 5 5 5 8 60 67 60
86 mIQDRs, WalBiQ 67 6-4 (44.4%) 5-5 (5%) 5-8 (5%) 6 8 4 8 3 6 5 6 5 5 8 6 6
66 vaBi, vuas-yRQjijdI 69 8-4 (11.9%) 5-5 (5%) 6-0 (85%) 3 4 9 5 6 4 6 5 5 5 0 65 -1
05 AijUIs, SUali 68 5-6 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 6 8 4 4 6 6 5 5 5 6 5 3 5
65 eRas, eIdQaDI 66 5-6 (5%) 6-8 (05%) 8-8 (655%) 6 8 4 8 5 6 6 6 5 8 0 7 65
69 XRQF, OiulI 0 8-8 (655%) 6-8 (05%) 5-5 (5%) 6 5 6 6 5 4 5 5 5 5 9 66 0
3 oUilI, eIdQaDI 0 5-8 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5-5 (5%) 5 5 5 6 8 5 5 5 5 5 5 -4 -1
61 AalLi, kilEuRZaI  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
77 AIusi, yQijZI  gXO - CIiZh's gRZasaIj
wIUil   85-42 (08.1%) 66-87 (49.7%) 68-84 (08.8%) 66 45 36 69 61 86 0 8 5 65 20 72  



Terms:
Field Goals :  2PM-A  (2 point Field Goal made-attempts)     3PM-A  (3 point Field Goal made-attempts)   FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive)  DEF (Defensive)   TOT  (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed)  RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor)  AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes)  AST (assists)  ST (steals)   TO (Turnovers)   PTS (points)  RNK (ranking)